The Official Perfection KOs Creationism Thread!

[nonconformist]

Okay, thanks to Carlos and TLC!

I read part of the naturist Desmond Morris's book "Manwatching" (a sorta objective view on the human race) that brought up these factors.

Have any of you read it? I recommend it.

And keep on fighting

 

[The Last Conformist]

I've not read it. I'll soon have to start a list of books to read after I retire.

 

[carlosMM]

me neither. As I said, i tend not to care for human evolution - by all probability, we should have ONE complete skeleton (or parts of more together making one complete) since CLA. We have some more stuff, but still, we know so little.

But I'll read it if you recommend it.

 

[nonconformist]

But I'll read it if you recommend it.

Keeping in midn I'm a 17 year old chemist with a short attention span

 

[carlosMM]

Keeping in midn I'm a 17 year old chemist with a short attention span

hehe, longer than civ2's

keep in mind I'm a paleontologist - I MUST be nuts anyways

 

[civ2]

Blasphemous
Reeeeally???
So you say photosynthesis can be done in human cells?
You just said the cells are similar.
The first cells were neither animal or plant.
Ani shachachti - ata ben-brit? Dati? Ani choshev she lo.
Lama ata medaber kaze?

 

[The Last Conformist]

Similarity is a relative concept. Compared to bacterial cells, human and plant cells are similar.

 

[carlosMM]

Blasphemous
Reeeeally???
So you say photosynthesis can be done in human cells?
You just said the cells are similar.
The first cells were neither animal or plant.
Ani shachachti - ata ben-brit? Dati? Ani choshev she lo.
Lama ata medaber kaze?

similar doesn't mean identical - will you THINK just once?

 

[Blasphemous]

Blasphemous
Reeeeally???
So you say photosynthesis can be done in human cells?
You just said the cells are similar.
The first cells were neither animal or plant.
Ani shachachti - ata ben-brit? Dati? Ani choshev she lo.
Lama ata medaber kaze?

([I apologize for following transliterated Hebrew, he started it, nothing new or even on-topic is said here anyways.] Ani isre'eli, ve'ba memischpacha yehudit [reformit], aval ischit ani ate'ist ve'hiloni. Me'od ate'ist ve'hiloni. )

No, I did not say human cells can do photosynthesis. (is that a verb as well? to photosynthesise?)
I was simply demonstrating the point that by definition living things cannot have anything new, only changes to the existing thing - at the most basic unit, the living cell.

 

[The Last Conformist]

"To photosynthesize" is a verb, yes.

(I had for years thought it was "photosynthetize" - for whatever reason, the Swedish form fotosyntetisera restores the 't' of the stem.)

 

[carlosMM]

perfection: check this edit:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=3153754&postcount=916

 

[Master Lexx]

I can only say, think about it! Prove it! That´s what ontogeny and phylogeny show.
All animals (including humans) have the same origins! They developed out of one basic thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontogeny_and_phylogeny

But anyways, this thread is stupid. Evolution Theory is only called theory to be
scientific correct but it is true because you can prove it and it´s logic.

Or let´s wait until we met the first alien race, what to believe then?...
... maybe god made a second race after humans and also decided to throw them out of paradise!

 

[Perfection]

But anyways, this thread is stupid.

Why is this thread stupid?

 

[RoboPig]

Why is this thread stupid?

because it's silly to even think that creationism can be supported
personally, i think creationism is silly because it is like nostradamus, even though it has no facts, people beleive in it for some weird reason

 

[Master Lexx]

Okay, it´s sensless, not stupid. But maybe it helps some people to believe that darwins evolution theory is right!

 

[Perfection]

because it's silly to even think that creationism can be supported
personally, i think creationism is silly because it is like nostradamus, even though it has no facts, people beleive in it for some weird reason

I've heard numerous people claim that creationism is scientifically supported, the purpose of this thread is to dispell that myth, I don't see how it is silly or senseless.

 

[RoboPig]

I've heard numerous people claim that creationism is scientifically supported, the purpose of this thread is to dispell that myth, I don't see how it is silly or senseless.

i dont think it's silly, i just figured that's why Lexx said it was stupid

 

[tR1cKy]

YAY!!!! This thread is back to life!!!

Lexx, if you are in doubt about the usefulness of this thread, read some of the creationist's posts... see the nonsense that they toss in and tell me if bashing creationism doesn't have some sense

 

[Swiss Bezerker]

I can only say, think about it! Prove it! That´s what ontogeny and phylogeny show.
All animals (including humans) have the same origins! They developed out of one basic thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontogeny_and_phylogeny

But anyways, this thread is stupid.

the why did you just ressurect it?

 

[blackheart]

Kill the thread!