jackelgull
An aberration of nature
It's just an instance where someone takes a moral principle, and then expands it to the point where it's not functional. Morality is too fuzzy for simple sentences. Governments are too.
Now, I have strong sympathies for many libertarian principles. There's a lot of good stuff in there. But the concept just cannot be expanded. The original property wasn't apportioned fairly. Access to the justice system isn't proportionate. Some things are massively more efficient when done together. Externalities cannot properly be tracked and assigned, etc. etc.
I lost a lot of respect for the suasion abilities of the libertarian philosophy during the Ebola crisis. There was an obvious libertarian solution. And nearly everyone I know who claims to be 'libertarian' didn't pursue it.
What was the obvious libertarian solution? I'm not seeing the obviousness here.