UK Politics - BoJo and chums

Status
Not open for further replies.
That website gives me privacy alarms. Not read bill so cannot comment on text.

But I thought that the electoral commission was supposed to be about elections and
referendums and therefore be independent and non partisan, but it jumped into an
investigation of who paid for redecoration of the PM's flat at Keir Starmer's prompt.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56915307
 
It's almost as if something is still potentially illegal, no matter who refers the case.
 
I am not sure what your point is.

Everything is potentially illegal because a future regime may change the law and apply that change retrospectively.
 
That website gives me privacy alarms.
I know what you mean, but it should not. It is 68k.news, a no javascript, minimum cookie text based interface to google news. You can also set any location, to see what google is telling people in other countries. It avoids the tracking and PII popups of the news sites.
 
Tories and Russian money:

Centre for American Progress, a thinktank close to the Biden administration

The United Kingdom, in particular, has become a major hub for Russian oligarchs and their wealth, with London gaining the moniker “Londongrad.” Uprooting Kremlin-linked oligarchs will be a challenge given the close ties between Russian money and the United Kingdom’s ruling conservative party, the press, and its real estate and financial industry.
Layla Moran, Labour foreign affairs spokesperson

Boris Johnson should use the almost £2m of Russian-linked donations received by the Conservative Party [since BoJo took charge] to support the people of Ukraine. This would send a powerful signal to Putin that the Conservatives are serious about no longer allowing themselves to be bankrolled by Russian money. It would also provide vital support to Ukrainians on the ground facing the threat of invasion and a sustained campaign of Russian disinformation. (old link with details)
Liz Truss

All of those donations are properly declared.​
 
I'm eagerly awaiting somebody to blame Labour for the London situation just because Khan happens to be Mayor :D

EDIT
I know what you mean, but it should not. It is 68k.news, a no javascript, minimum cookie text based interface to google news. You can also set any location, to see what google is telling people in other countries. It avoids the tracking and PII popups of the news sites.
It's got an invalid SSL cert, which is causing Chrome (and probably other browsers) to prevent access (without confirmation).

ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID specifically.
 
I'm eagerly awaiting somebody to blame Labour for the London situation just because Khan happens to be Mayor :D

I suggest you try the Daily Mail.

You may have to wait a very long time on this forum.

Most people regard him as as no worse or better than his two predecessors, Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone.
 
At the very least, I can't imagine many people are sad Ken is gone :D

Maggie abolished the GLC, sold city hall for a pittance and even had the college of arms strike London's crest in an act of sheer spite. An awful lot of Londoners regarded him as Mayor-in-exile. In a way Maggie made a slightly weird newt guy more powerful and popular than he ever had been.

When he came back he did a hell of a lot. The hire bikes, the congestion charge, wildly lower TFL fares, setting up the ultra low emission zone.

All Boris ever did was to not cancel some of Livingstone's plans. Boris's solution to the illegal air quality? Cancel the ULEZ and hire diesel trucks to spray water on the roads around the testing stations.

Livingstone was leagues above BpJo.
 
It's got an invalid SSL cert, which is causing Chrome (and probably other browsers) to prevent access (without confirmation).

ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID specifically.

The certificate is valid, but it is for the wrong domain. That is a big red flag.
 
0_trussJPG.jpg

The wife of a former Russian minister who gave the Conservatives £1.8m, making her "the biggest female donor in recent British political history", with six female Cabinet members including the then PM. From Liz Truss's instagram from 2019.

The biggest single donor [who may be considered an oligarch] is the financier Lubov Chernukhin, who has donated £700,000. A British national since 2011, she is married to Vladimir Chernukhin, a former deputy finance minister under Putin. Documents published in the Pandora papers in October suggest he was allowed to leave Russia in 2004 with assets worth about $500m (£366m) and retain Russian business connections.

A Labour party calculation based on Electoral Commission information estimated that donors who had made money from Russia or Russians had given £1.93m to either the Tory party or constituency associations since Johnson became prime minister.

Others put the sum higher. Ian Blackford, the SNP's Westminster leader, to whom Johnson was replying in the Commons on Wednesday, said the Tories had raised £2.3m "from Russian oligarchs".

The industrialist Alexander Temerko, also a UK national, has donated £357,000 since Johnson took office. He is a minority shareholder and co-owner of a company called Aquind. Its majority investor is the Russian-born oil tycoon Viktor Fedotov.

Another big Tory donor in the Johnson era is the businessman Mohamed Amersi, who has given £258,000 over the period.

Amersi advised on a lucrative telecom deal in Russia in 2005 with a company that a Swiss tribunal subsequently found to be controlled by an associate of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. Amersi told the Financial Times in July he had made $7m in the country, but only prior to 2008. "Not a penny that I earned in Russia … has even remotely come close to being invested in the UK political system," he said.
 
Last edited:
Govt suggests Brits should hand passports to social media companies

The country's forthcoming Online Safety Bill will require citizens to hand over even more personal data to largely foreign-headquartered social media platforms, government minister Nadine Dorries has declared.

"When it comes to verifying identities," said DCMS in a statement, "some platforms may choose to provide users with an option to verify their profile picture to ensure it is a true likeness. Or they could use two-factor authentication where a platform sends a prompt to a user's mobile number for them to verify."
"Alternatively," continued the statement, "verification could include people using a government-issued ID such as a passport to create or update an account."

Two-factor authentication is a login technology to prevent account hijacking by malicious people, not a method of verifying a user's government-approved identity.

Today's statement had led to widespread concerns that DCMS will place UK residents at greater risk of online identity theft or of falling victim to a data breach.

The Online Safety Bill was renamed from the Online Harms Bill shortly before its formal introduction to Parliament. Widely accepted as a disaster in the making by the technically literate, critics have said the bill risks creating an "algorithm-driven censorship future" through new regulations that would make it legally risky for platforms not to proactively censor users' posts.

Parliamentary efforts at properly scrutinising the draft bill then led to the "scrutineers" instead publishing a manifesto asking for even more stronger legal weapons be included.​
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60558048

Posting this here as its only UK news and relates entirely to the incompetence of our foreign secretary.

I watched this on Sunday and thought Liz Truss saying she would absolutely support people from the UK to go and fight in Ukraine as completely irresponsible. The government should never encourage that, regardless of the cause. Because fighting under foreign colors means individuals leave themselves exposed to prosecution, capture, or death. And the UK state would be unable to protect them.

Liz Truss has been an embarrassment as foreign secretary. From turning up in Moscow in a fluffy hat in order to fit in, to this, she has come across as a complete lightweight who is completely unsuited to the role.
 
Liz Truss has been an embarrassment as foreign secretary. From turning up in Moscow in a fluffy hat in order to fit in, to this, she has come across as a complete lightweight who is completely unsuited to the role.

You mean that she suits Johnson's cabinet of incompetents perfectly, then.
 
You mean that she suits Johnson's cabinet of incompetents perfectly, then.

Yes. She is however arguably worse than Boris was as foreign secretary. And that was pretty damn awful. I sincerely hope if there is world war 3 we can at least have someone other than Boris in charge. If I'm about to be potentially vaporised along with the rest of humanity, having him as PM would depress me no end :lol:
 
Well what can I say; imo there is not much fruit picking in Wales in March, twitters is for twits.

Cabinet government not working so well, no considered policy; just ad hoc comments.
 
That's precisely the sort of Cabinet Johnson has cultivated, after all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom