United States and Circumcision

la cosa nostra said:
Who cares, America is a stupid country, I'm just happy my penis wasnt cut a third way down like a jews at birth.
If your foreskin makes up 1/3 of your penis you may need a different kind of surgury. :mischief:
 
Narz said:
If your foreskin makes up 1/3 of your penis you may need a different kind of surgury. :mischief:

Oh, getting me on technicalities? You're a real smart one arent you? Yes the foreskin covers about the first third of the penis (unerected, give or take 10-30%), any more biology questions professor?
 
Narz said:
Wow, that's f***ed up!!!

I would never cut my penis for any woman. I'm already cut but if I wasn't I would leave a chick instantly who didn't have the proper respect (preferably worship) for my member.
thats what I thought too.

I am not cut and if any chick wanted me to get cut. I would dump her, and run Europe. At least their I wont have to put up with as many shallow women.
The worst part about it is, he is later dumped by her. CUtting his "boy" for a girl he isn't dateing anymore. I have a hard time thinking any guy would do that. EVER!!!

PS
About not cutting your sons, :goodjob:
 
la cosa nostra said:
Oh, getting me on technicalities? You're a real smart one arent you? Yes the foreskin covers about the first third of the penis (unerected, give or take 10-30%), any more biology questions professor?
Just playing around there killer. I see you know your ***** so no there will be no more questions. ;)
 
I am the Future said:
CUtting his "boy" for a girl he isn't dateing anymore. I have a hard time thinking any guy would do that. EVER!!!
Remember, it's a show for women. Women love to think that men would abuse themselves for their sakes.

I am the Future said:
PS
About not cutting your sons, :goodjob:

Thanks. :)
 
Narz said:
Wow, that's f***ed up!!!

I would never cut my penis for any woman. I'm already cut but if I wasn't I would leave a chick instantly who didn't have the proper respect (preferably worship) for my member.

I feel your pain brother. But hey, at least you weren't tramatized 3 days after birth by some pervert sculpting your wang with a sharp blade.

I would actually cut myself if she did the same, like if she asks for it due to "cleanliness" and "appearance" , she should be ready to get her labia cut off for the same reasons.

That would be fair actually.
 
Actually you've got it wrong about the TV show, in that episode it's Charlotte (The one usually most willing to please a man) who expresses disgust at having an uncircumsized penis, then she finds out he's having it snipped just for her, after which he decides his penis is now so magnificent he needs to show it to the world, and he dumps her. What a load of tosh.

Incidentally I think Samantha (The one who likes sex the most) might mention that uncircumsized penises are the best, but I think that's just there to show what a great big slut she is and how she'll enjoy sex with anything, even, god forbid, an unmutilated penis... heavens above!
 
El_Machinae said:
I wonder how you could quantify the difference in sensitivity. I'm sure that both samples will have an equal description of their impression of sex.

Well, we (not-circumsized men) know both feelings I guess. We are able to withdraw the foreskin so the head is 'naked'. Now I'll stop here, not sure if this already was too much information for some people. :p
 
No one cut my penis, however someone did cut one of my testicle. At the age of 14 i had a testicular torsion and let me tell you, it F****** hurts. To the point i passed out at the hospital when i arrived there.

I needed immediate treatment as the testicle can die in a few hours and must be removed! Thankfully, wasn't that bad and both are working fine to this day!
 
I never understood how people came up with the idea of circumcision in the first place? What was the person who invented this thinking?

“Hmm, here I have a baby boy. Let’s see what I can do with him? Maybe I should cut of the tip of his dick?
[Snip, snip]
Yeah, that was a great idea! I bet this will become very popular!” :groucho:
 
la cosa nostra said:
Oh, getting me on technicalities? You're a real smart one arent you? Yes the foreskin covers about the first third of the penis (unerected, give or take 10-30%), any more biology questions professor?

Well so you remove a covering,the covering of the head no less. It's not like any real part of your wee-wee is cut off, it's still the same length and all.


And on the whole sensativity issue. So you can feel more? We can last longer. So if you can have sex for 10 minutes with double the pleasure as us, we can balance that with lasting 20 minutes with half the pleasure as you ;)
(though I'm sure those numbers are horribly skeewed. I highly doubt I lost half of my sensativity)


Would you rather eat a banana with the peel on or the peel off? :p
 
Yeeek said:
No one cut my penis, however someone did cut one of my testicle. At the age of 14 i had a testicular torsion and let me tell you, it F****** hurts. To the point i passed out at the hospital when i arrived there.

I needed immediate treatment as the testicle can die in a few hours and must be removed!
Did they remove one testicle?

Thankfully, wasn't that bad and both are working fine to this day!
You mean it grew back?
 
willemvanoranje said:
Yeeek... you have no idea how appropriate your screenname is at the moment...
:lol: Wrong but bravo.
 
Pikachu said:
I never understood how people came up with the idea of circumcision in the first place? What was the person who invented this thinking?

“Hmm, here I have a baby boy. Let’s see what I can do with him? Maybe I should cut of the tip of his dick?
[Snip, snip]
Yeah, that was a great idea! I bet this will become very popular!” :groucho:
I think he might have been thinking something along the lines of:

"Maan... This itch is killing me! Gotta do something radical here."
(Though prolly in ancient Egyptian or similar.)

It's said to be a practice that makes perfect sense in the desert; not a lot of water for washing yourself and that sand tends to get in everywhere.:)
 
Pikachu said:
I never understood how people came up with the idea of circumcision in the first place? What was the person who invented this thinking?

“Hmm, here I have a baby boy. Let’s see what I can do with him? Maybe I should cut of the tip of his dick?
[Snip, snip]
Yeah, that was a great idea! I bet this will become very popular!” :groucho:
I've heard it being related back to Ancient Egypt where they saw snakes loosing their skins and growing that way. The Ancient Egyptians mimmiced this in an effort to "beat death". At first it was only symbolic, not really cutting anything away, but making cuts into the foreskin at max. In the 2nd century this act was harshened by truly cutting away the skins, because there were men who allowed their foreskins to heal, so the foreskins were cut away since then.
In the USA it was introduced in the 1860's as a means to counter masturbation. When this reasoning was proved incorrect; health reasons were invented to justify it. %-ages of circumcised men in the USA: 1871: 1 %, 1920: 50 %. 1971: 90 %
 
I am one of those very few (now you can all die happy knowing that I'm intact), but the most common reason I hear is hygiene. Though I have no freakin idea what the hell that has to do with this form of "whacking" it off.

Due to a research project I have done on AIDS and HIV, I read that the part that is removed during circumcision is more susceptible to the HIV virus than the rest. And having it removed slightly lowers your chances of catching the virus. But even if your partner doesn't have this virus (or the latter disease), you should still use a condom unless you want to lose half your paycheck for the next 18 years.

I don't know why it should be a religious practice either, I don't think saying "cut your johnson off and you'll get to heaven" is a very good selling point for anything, much less a religion (yes I know it isn't all removed).
__________________

Finally someone mentions the HIV/AIDS risk of having non-circumcision. I read friggin 5 pages or so, and NOBODY even hinted at it. Come on people. That is probably the main reason most in US get it, at least round here.
 
Warman17 said:
Sure there is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreskin_restoration

The removal of foreskin isn't as perminent as people may think it is.

Also just to note, the stats at the end were taken of men already unsatisfied with being circumsized, it doesn't represent all of us curcs ;)

That is by far the most interesting thing I've read recently.

I mean, i just may have to get this.:mischief:

Circumcision is bullsh!t, i mean, cutting off part of a kids member when he can't even have any say in the matter.

lame.
 
you know, I really have to wonder somtimes why some people give a **** over what another guys penis looks like. If its part of a national culture to snip the tip, then why give a ****? Angry and depressed over such a surgery, or lack thier of? dumb. as. hell.

at best, I find the whole thread a shallow attempt to try to bash Amerika, and our evil foreskin cutting ways.
 
garric said:
It's a sad but true fact that nearly every white male born in the United States is circumsized at birth.

Not true, just another stereotype. Some Americans yes, some not. Reliable statistics for your claim?


Our family came here from Germany in the late 1700s so we are definitely American and none of the males in our entire extended family let anyone cut anything off.
 
Back
Top Bottom