thamis said:That's on purpose. I don't want fishing boats being mis-used for exploration... I knew that's what you wanted to do, cheater!
tssk tssk, i prefer merchant boat, it moves much faster. And well... we know the mapthamis said:I knew that's what you wanted to do, cheater!
Too bad this game does not really lend itself to multi-player because I would love play against you guys. It was tried in CIV III; but the results were less than satisfying. Would it not be great to exploit the tendencies of a human opponent like sticking a couple of fleets of triremes and transports loaded to bear up Carthages aft end as the focus is upon exploration to the north and west...."Pharoah rejoiced at the destruction of his hated rival to the west". All in the spirit of good fun.kwarriorpoet said:Hehe...I can almost see the huge map and the normal map with my eyes shut now...don't need no stinkin' exploration! But, yes, I send out my Carthaginian galleys ASAP
I echo comments concerning the civics, they do seem to come rather late, but there do seem to be plenty of buildings to ease the pain.
Perdant said:I just wanted to add my two cents here i find that TAM very playable multiplayer and have been playing this mod excluslvly with 2 friends for some months now we simply cannot go back to the original game. We are playing a huge map now in version 1.94 (still havent finished it yet) and all the modes of multi work no problem. The only issue that this mod has with multi player is some Civ are inhernatly stronger then others, Rome for example, as long as everyone playing is aware of it no problem.
But with version 1.94 anyways the multi player game improved dramitacly. because of the challange people have trading with the AI and lower cost for citie maintance. We are looking forward to finnishing this version 1.94 so we can finally move on to 1.95. Hopefully tonight they will capilulate to Carthage .
on a side note does anyone know if you can continue a game from a prior version with a new version. 1.94 to 1.95 in this case?
Ankenaton said:Too bad this game does not really lend itself to multi-player because I would love play against you guys. It was tried in CIV III; but the results were less than satisfying. Would it not be great to exploit the tendencies of a human opponent like sticking a couple of fleets of triremes and transports loaded to bear up Carthages aft end as the focus is upon exploration to the north and west...."Pharoah rejoiced at the destruction of his hated rival to the west". All in the spirit of good fun.
You may survive as my vassal...only if you give up all of that nasty child sacrifice thing of yours and come to pay homage to Pharoah so that he can enlighten you onto the worship of the one god...the Aten. With you and your Libyan barbarians...my Nubian vassals to the south...the worship of the Aten will spread to the frozen lands of the barbarians to the north. As for the Asiatics -Hittites, Persians, Babylonians etc...you know who you are...woe and destruction upon thee. No quarter shall be asked...and none shall be given. MUHAHAHA....MUHAHAHA....there stands Pharoah triumphant over his enemies.kwarriorpoet said:Sir, I'm sure you'd be as rutheless with Egypt as I am with the Hittites...who I would play by the way Carthage is just more challenging than Greece, Rome, the Hittites or Egypt, but you still have a chance I even conquered the world once with Phoenecia, lol, albeit on the normal map.
Carthage has allot to defend, many vulnerabilities, but thankfully, the AI doesn't know that yet Oh, and on the huge map, Tartessos doesn't exist.
I'd love to get into an MP game But Ank...if you're playing Egypt, then I can't let you live unless someone of similar capability and knowledge is playing...say Persia? Let Shqype play his blessed Illyrians, lol
Humans are so dastardly on this game.