What Book Are You Reading? Volume 9

Status
Not open for further replies.
madviking said:
It's a Flat World, After All by Thomas Friedman

Terrible in general. His writing is awful. And his argument is utterly divorced from reality.
 
Thomas Friedman is like a perfect case study on why I don't trust anything journalists say other than reporting of micro-events.
 
Democracy in America - Alexis De Tocqueville - But it's currently a ways away at my folks house, so I'm starting:

Fifty's favorite - The Brothers Karamazov - Fyodor Dostoevski

As an aside, Anna Karenina is arguably the greatest piece of literature ever written. Strong cases can certainly be made. It is only slow in sections to people who read lazily and with an untrained eye. By and large it's a superfluous masterpiece from start to finish. People who jeer at the social criticism really fail to understand the entire point of Tolstoy. He certainly wasn't writing for pure entertainment, and everything he ever wrote is layered and wrapped in deep political discourse.
 
BTW, I'm reading China: A History by John Keay. Exactly what it says on the tin. I'm halfway through it, just getting to the beginning of the Ming dynasty (The Rites of Ming, as the chapter is so entitled). I'm really enjoying it; it does what any good popular general history should do - lays out the major milestones of a big, long and complex stretch of time and space, and doing to so entertainingly.
 
My summer reading list for school next year. Tell if any of these are great.

The Lexus and the Olive Tree by Thomas Friedman
It's a Flat World, After All by Thomas Friedman
The End of Poverty by Jeffrey Sachs
The Post-American World by Fareed Zakaria
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
State of Fear by Michael Crichton

Who laid upon you this dreadful burden? I would rather read the entire Ayn Rand Collection.
 
Balance that list with some from this guy:

Ha Joon Chang

Thanks for the link. If I ever need to deliver a contrarian paper, I'll be sure to look there. :p

But this has reminded me another of another book I've read for leisure, Niall Ferguson's The Ascent of Money, which I would recommend for more historical, rather than financial, reasons. But, just keep in mind, I read the entire book on a plane fight from Frankfurt to DC. :lol:
 
madviking said:
But this has reminded me another of another book I've read for leisure, Niall Ferguson's The Ascent of Money, which I would recommend for more historical, rather than financial, reasons. But, just keep in mind, I read the entire book on a plane fight from Frankfurt to DC.

The Ascent of Money is a historian doing a hack-job of economic history with a strong partisan bent. I'd rather read Thomas Friedman..
 
The Ascent of Money is a historian doing a hack-job of economic history with a strong partisan bent. I'd rather read Thomas Friedman..

Hack-job? How so?

Compared to many other books, it thought it was rather firm on details. Covering the history of gold, banking, bonds, bubbles, insurance, risk etc I found it pretty interesting, and I learned a lot. (Though, this may be to due to the fact it was the only book within reach on my flight...)
 
I read Colossus, also by Ferguson. The facts are straight; it's the posturing he does with them that's the liability.
 
Memoirs of a Geisha by IDK the author.
 
I read Colossus, also by Ferguson. The facts are straight; it's the posturing he does with them that's the liability.

The Ascent of Money is a historian doing a hack-job of economic history with a strong partisan bent. I'd rather read Thomas Friedman..

I've read Empire and parts of Colossus. The former seemed okay, although there are probably better histories of the British Empire out there. Here's a good review of Colossus (and the End of Poverty):

You get the sense that it’s bad from the cover quotes. Gaddis: “No contemporary historian rivals … Ferguson for the range, productivity, and visibility of his scholarship.” Ernest May: “Every page of Colossus is provocative.” Paul Kennedy: “Amid the seemingly endless writings and decisions about ‘America as Empire,’ the most prominent recent voice is that of Niall Ferguson.” Even Max Boot: Colossus is sure to shake the assumptions of both fans and critics of American Empire.” Clever readers will note what’s missing from all of these; an actual endorsement of Ferguson’s work. He’s provocative, productive, visible, prominent, and assumption shaking, but none of the esteemed reviewers can actually bring themselves to say his argument is compelling, well reasoned, or sensible. Getting hit in the head with a 2×4 is “provocative”, after all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom