What I don't like about the Harry Potter Series

they are probably friends with each other though. anyway, you cant be a communist and a nazi

No they're not. Cuz theres only like one. And I can be both a commounist and nazi. I can espouse a combination of both beliefs. After all commounisim is socialisim and nazis were national-socialists.
 
I also don't quite understand why the Death Eaters showed such loyalty toward Voldemore. Voldemore appeared more like a lunatic than a great leader to me. What is the lofty idealogy that is binding them together?
 
Dida said:
I also don't quite understand why the Death Eaters showed such loyalty toward Voldemore. Voldemore appeared more like a lunatic than a great leader to me. What is the lofty idealogy that is binding them together?

They're all sadists. They enjoy inflicating pain and suffering on others. They revel in it. Its the same thing with my friends. Most of them are satnists and sadistic so I get along and agree with them well. Rascsim aginst non-magic also.
 
Bozo Erectus said:
I categorically refuse to ever read a Harry Potter book or see any of the movies, because I refuse to be a robot who likes whatever the media orders him to like.

Well said. You must be a republican... if not, there's hope for you yet!
 
silver 2039 said:
They're all sadists. They enjoy inflicating pain and suffering on others. They revel in it. Its the same thing with my friends. Most of them are satnists and sadistic so I get along and agree with them well. Rascsim aginst non-magic also.

I strongly disagree, most of them are either power mad or deluded. Lucius Malfoy for example used to be both. He thought Voldemort was truly a pure-blood fanatic (wrong, Voldemort is crafty but meritocratic, and the pure blood faction is just one that he's using in his push for domination of England).

More importantly Malfoy saw Voldemort as a rising star under whom he could shelter his own extant patronage network. Well that worked out real well - now Voldemort is a fugitive and Malfoy has no choice but to be on the run with him.

The motivations of the Death Eaters are a lot more complex than they appear superficially. That's why, while the books are for kids, they can interest adults. Just like in, say, Tolkein, there is a LOT going on behind the scenes that is never explained and probably won't be even in the last book, but that observant readers can deduce.
 
Darth_Pugwash said:
Well, I was being sarcastic in that post, it was meant to be a dig at people who don't like popular things such as Harry Potter, becuase they think it makes them cool and mature.

Ah cool so we were both taking a dig at the same group of people. :)
 
silver 2039 said:
He was a nerd. No one likes nerds.

The Nerds are the master race. You will be assimilated.

No girls prefer jocks with money, because they are shallow sluts. They always have and they always will.

Preach it my brother!
:clap: :hatsoff:
 
Well if Voldemort takes over England I'm still safe in the USA.

Before we shun Lord Voldemort for being a deranged, evil sorcerer, we must consider his background and then make an informed decision on how the trial should proceed. It is without question that Voldemort occupied professor Quinsley’s body and tried to kill Harry Potter, but we cannot just sentence him to death without considering his rough childhood background.

Voldemort’s mother died just after giving birth, living only long enough to give him his name. Voldemort, having no mother, was fearful and therefore was not an easy child to take care of. He very well may also have had Attention Deficit Disorder as well. His father disowned him at the age of four and Voldemort grew up with strangers in an orphanage, never knowing his mother, and only knowing his father through memories of rejection.

Now, I ask anyone who still thinks that Voldemort shouldn’t be pardoned from this atrocity, “How can someone who lived through such trauma, be expected to grow up like any other person of normal stature as if nothing was ever wrong?” We cannot be so cold-hearted as to punish Voldemort for what he has done, since his actions were a product of his neglect as a child, which was entirely out of his control. Voldemort, having grown up with a feeling of being powerless and weak through out his childhood, merely wanted to experience some sense of having control in the only way he knew how. Voldemort is a human being like any of us. Let us not be barbaric savages. Spare Voldemort the death penalty, and pardon his actions!
 
A lifetime at Azkaban of course is worse than death.
 
A lifetime at Azkaban of course is worse than death.
But all the Dementors are Voldie's best friends. Besides, he feeds off misery and there's no happiness in him to suck out. He would enjoy it.

By the way, one thing I like about the Harry Potter books is Voldemort. He's a pretty good villain, complete with a long back story yet still plenty of mystery and what's best of all, indescribable power that is feared by all.
 
The entire series. +unrealism(if I was 15 and lived in a huge castle with probably hundreds of hot girls,I would probably be casting nudeness spells and summoning prostitute spirits not playing some frackin quidtich)
 
I can't stand Harry Potter. His name makes my blood boil. Perhaps it is that I can't stand reading such unrealistic, fantasy BS. Maybe if it wasn't so popular now I might read the series, but there is not way I will read any of the books now. I can't stand how some people get sooooooo passionate when they speak their love and interest for the darn book, and how much they like or dislike particular characters. There are some books I feel that way about, but do I even attempt to tell anyone else? No. It is a fictional book. Get over it.
 
I know some people act like it's a way of life. My friend, who actually thinks there is a Harry Potter school in England, saw the new movie today... and he's 22 ys. old!
 
Cleric said:
The entire series. +unrealism(if I was 15 and lived in a huge castle with probably hundreds of hot girls,)

You would be in great peril.
 
Dell19 said:
What happens if you like something and then it becomes popular?

Well, if its a music group, you could say they sold out. You probably could say it for a lot of other things. Or you could pretend you never liked it, or you could say that you used to like it before it was popular but no it isn't as cool.

As long as there is something popular, you will find people who don't like popular things, and you will be popular with them if you don't like those things either (as ironic as that is ;) ).

BTW, I tend to think that Quiddich isn't a great concept for a sport either. Sure there are some cool things about it, but I don't like the very differentiated roles that makes the game feel so confining.

I read the books and tend to enjoy them. I haven't watched the movies since the first one and some fans of the books are starting to tell me they didn't like Goblet of Fire, so I doubt I'll bother to watch that movie either.
 
Atlas14 said:
I can't stand Harry Potter. His name makes my blood boil. Perhaps it is that I can't stand reading such unrealistic, fantasy BS. Maybe if it wasn't so popular now I might read the series, but there is not way I will read any of the books now. I can't stand how some people get sooooooo passionate when they speak their love and interest for the darn book, and how much they like or dislike particular characters. There are some books I feel that way about, but do I even attempt to tell anyone else? No. It is a fictional book. Get over it.

So, in order to put yourself in sharp contrast with the rest of the crowd you decided to hate Harry Potter? I bet there is no better way to make yourself feel superior.
 
What happens if you like something and then it becomes popular?

Indeed.

I read the first book before it was published in the US... got handed an advance copy from a friend who works at a bookstore. So does that make me a bandwagon hop-onner? No, it makes me a snobby fan who brags about how he "knew all about it before it went big." I don't see how that's any better ;)

The books have stayed the same while I've somewhat outgrown them, but ya have to stay faithful and see the series through!
 
If you want something seriously wrong with HP:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunnydale_Syndrome

Not only are the Muggles blind to magic for no reason at all, but the wizards are incredibly ignorant wrt. the Muggles, cf. "eckeltricity?"

Oh, and why isn't Veritaserum used at trials?
 
Back
Top Bottom