Okay, just for the record, I am going to remember who is now in this thread embracing 'founding father intent' for future reference...
Why wouldn't you take it into consideration? You're asking us to discuss why the statement was included rather then just leaving it out, so I believe it would be foolish not to consider the 'founding father intent' in order to properly reply. I find it odd that many think it foolish not to take it into consideration.