feldmarshall
Dictator
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2007
- Messages
- 387
great britain is not running state property civic so its maintanance cost is a pain. should be transferred to argentina
Is that of any importance? The fact is that the French WERE already there.hmm nice use of "invaded" there. The French were on one island, we settled on another. Hardly D-Day was it?
If we knew the French were there? Why wait a year before demanding that they leave?
In fact Spanish expelled the English invaders rightfully and then they signed a treaty accepting some obscure previous English rights, mainly to save English honor and ovoid further conflict, but without any practical effect as the islands were under Spanish sovereignty and the english left.Ahh so you conviently by-pass 1771 when the Spanish sign over the rights of the islands to us? At this point there had been no war, no 'invasion' merely a bunch of nations who used the islands from time to time and wanted bases there. The French sold them to you, whilst we were on the other half of the island, then the Spanish signed them to us.
It doesnt matter? So you dont agree with the right to self-determination? Once again, there were Argentinians living there in 1833 when the English invaded (again).It matters not what happened thereafter 1771. Spain signed them to us freely and with their consent. With us they rightfully remain.
That's so long ago. Southern Sweden was once populated by Danes, until Sweden took the area from us and forced the people to become Swedes. After a few hundred years they succeded. So what, should we demand the area back or what? In that case, Europe would be one big mess with countries demanding land back. Forget it. Let it go and let the people who live there today decide for them selves.It doesnt matter? So you dont agree with the right to self-determination? Once again, there were Argentinians living there in 1833 when the English invaded (again).
It doesnt matter? So you dont agree with the right to self-determination? Once again, there were Argentinians living there in 1833 when the English invaded (again).
It should remain British. I mean who cares about a puny island that rely, on all things, on the SQUID INDUSTRY?
The people have spoken. If the peoples right to sef-determination is not the key then the world is going to get very messy very fast.
The UK's legal claim is at least as good as Spain's, even ignoring the reality on the ground.
I don't think Spain has any claims on the Falklands/Malvinas.![]()
The Falklands are sitting on enough undersea oil to make Dick Cheney blush.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,334165,00.html