Where ideas really come from.

Mouthwash

Escaped Lunatic
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
9,370
Location
Hiding
In my experience, this is one hundred percent true:

"This is not a simple question, yet so many people give it a simple answer. “Read more fiction” is a simple answer, but it's also a crappy one. Yet, so many writers say it, repeat it, and swear by it. Why? Because we all enjoy reading and, heck, it sounds like a decent way to get ideas, right? Not so much. It's more likely to set you up to steal ideas, and you won't even be doing it intentionally.

You know darn well that many new writers produce work that reads exactly like someone else's story. That's because knuckleheads keep telling them to read more, and then these new writers take the advice and read their 900th R.A. Salvatore book. Then they're surprised when their own work continues to read like a bad R.A. Salvatore fan fiction. What do you expect?

Ideas are produced by a largely-subconscious synthesizing process. The human mind is incredibly good at taking multiple concepts and combining them into new ones. It takes A, adds it to B, and creates C. Every new thought in your head is a product of that math, although you don't see it happening.

It's like this: At some point in history, someone looked at a potato, then looked at a hammer, and mashed potatoes were born. The idea of mashed potatoes didn't just fly into someone's head while they were playing with their kids. The idea was a synthesis of two existing concepts within the creator's mind; In this case, it may have been “I can smash things with a hammer” and “potatoes taste good.”

The point of that barely-adequate illustration? If said person had no idea what a potato was, they couldn't have come up with mashed potatoes. A+B=C. They would have lacked the required conceptual raw materials to assemble the idea.

The more concepts you have in your mind, the more creative you can be. Think of knowledge as a pile of Lego bricks. The more of them you have, the more things you can build. Therefore, the first step to becoming a never-ending wellspring of creativity is to stockpile your mind with conceptual raw material. Yes, this means learning about the world and experiencing its many facets for yourself.

Now, go back to the Lego analogy. You may have a pile of blocks as high as your waist . . . but what if they're all blue 4x4 blocks? You can only build so many things when you have a pile of the same block, because your creative options are so severely limited. You get the same outcome when you learn about, read, or experience the same things over and over again. You'll have tons of “stuff” in your head, but it's all variations on a theme. Thus, the second step to unlocking your creative mind is to diversify your conceptual raw material. Reading nothing but science fiction novels will fill your brain with all the same blocks. Where's the fun in that?

I never run out of ideas. When other writers are stuck with their own stories, I can usually come up with a solution in seconds. Why? Because I have a huge, diverse stockpile of raw concepts. I enjoy writing fantasy, but I haven't read a fantasy novel in two years. I read naval history books, magazines about celebrities, National Geographic, biographies, and non-fiction books about photography. And guess what? I've gotten more original ideas for fantasy fiction from reading photography textbooks than I ever did from reading fantasy. The reason is obvious: if you're getting ideas for your fantasy story by reading fantasy novels, you're going to have a hell of a time being original.

When it comes to raw innovation in storytelling, you can forget “The Hero's Journey.” Forget outlining and all of the technical methods. It's the assortment of knowledge, the raw materials, in your brain that matter. Star Wars exists because George Lucas watched Flash Gordon and old samurai movies. His creative mind combined elements from what he knew to assemble what he created. He didn't just pull the ideas from the air . . . nor did Lucas ever claim to. He'll openly tell you where his ideas came from, and if he'd never learned about a variety of genres, Star Wars would not exist. That's that.

Ideas do not come from some other dimension. They are not magical or bestowed by the muses. They are the product of intelligence. They are the product of diverse knowledge. There's a good reason why most successful writers are bright-minded folks. If great ideas magically appeared from space, everyone would have them. There would be no bias leaning towards intelligence, but there is. If you want better ideas, focus on learning more about the world.

Reading fiction is easy, but reading to learn can be a challenge. And that's where most aspiring writers cut their own throats. They read novel after novel, usually in their preferred genre, thinking that it will have some impact on their own ideas. Reading non-fiction, especially if it has nothing to do with what you're planning to write, will give you a far greater creative advantage. I promise."

-http://www.writingforums.org/articles/where-do-ideas-come-from-ill-tell-you/
 
Although I don't write, it makes sense to me.
 
Dude I was just about that exact metaphor, the idea of taking old ideas as Lego pieces to make new stuff. You didn't make the Legos, but you did reassemble them.

Somewhere is a guy who invents the Lego, but the first Lego sets are boring and bland and not that cool, so you could be that guy, but you're also good as the guy who takes Lego to castle theme, or takes Castle theme to Dragon Castle Theme, or realizes he just really likes setting up the guys and the towns so makes Playmobil instead. Or you just play with what someone else designed and sold you and make something cool.

I see this with music a lot. The dopest most psychedelic dance party techno of the past few years is 80s beats with 70s synth melodics, with modern sound processing and arrangements. They are taking old Legos and adding them to new play spaces.

Read a Terx op and you'll see him synthesizing the previous month of CFC OT. You will find many of the Lego pieces in others' posts leading up to the grand synthesis.
 
Why isn't this in science section? This screams neuroscience.
 
Why isn't this in science section? This screams neuroscience.

There is overlap between neuroscience and philosophy, so the arts forum would be just as appropriate for this thread as the science forum.
 
In my experience, this is one hundred percent true:

"This is not a simple question, yet so many people give it a simple answer. “Read more fiction” is a simple answer, but it's also a crappy one. Yet, so many writers say it, repeat it, and swear by it. Why? Because we all enjoy reading and, heck, it sounds like a decent way to get ideas, right? Not so much. It's more likely to set you up to steal ideas, and you won't even be doing it intentionally.

You know darn well that many new writers produce work that reads exactly like someone else's story. That's because knuckleheads keep telling them to read more, and then these new writers take the advice and read their 900th R.A. Salvatore book. Then they're surprised when their own work continues to read like a bad R.A. Salvatore fan fiction. What do you expect?
This can happen even without having read a plethora of similar stories. Years ago, a friend decided to enter the short-story contest at the annual summer science fiction convention. The entries would be critiqued by a panel of local writers, plus the official Guests of Honor (Con-Version's GoHs were always professional science fiction/fantasy authors).

After the panel got through with her story, my friend came to me in tears. She said they'd accused her of plagiarism, and handed me her story to read. I read it and said (paraphrased), "I can see why. The ending of this story is almost exactly like the scene in Carl Sagan's novel Contact when the group of scientists come out of the Machine. From their perspective they took a trip to an alien planet and talked to aliens. From the perspective of the people on Earth they went into the Machine, stayed in there for a few minutes, and then came out again - and never went anywhere."

She protested that she couldn't possibly have plagiarized Sagan's story because she'd never read it, or anything Sagan wrote (I had no problem believing her, since she refuses to accept evolution, considered any explanations I gave her about science to be "preaching" and couldn't even understand that the entirety of Jesus' life did not happen between 1 BC and 1 AD).

Where I'm going with this is that it's entirely possible for two extremely different people to have very similar ideas. I have no idea where either of them got their ideas for their stories. I know Carl Sagan read science fiction from the time he was a child. My friend was into Star Trek and Quantum Leap and was generally not well-read in science fiction. She thought she had a fresh, new idea, and got stomped down by people who assumed that everybody must have read Sagan's book.

I'm not saying they were wrong to say her story wasn't good - it really wasn't that good. But they could have been more tactful than to accuse her of plagiarism.

Ideas are produced by a largely-subconscious synthesizing process. The human mind is incredibly good at taking multiple concepts and combining them into new ones. It takes A, adds it to B, and creates C. Every new thought in your head is a product of that math, although you don't see it happening.

It's like this: At some point in history, someone looked at a potato, then looked at a hammer, and mashed potatoes were born. The idea of mashed potatoes didn't just fly into someone's head while they were playing with their kids. The idea was a synthesis of two existing concepts within the creator's mind; In this case, it may have been “I can smash things with a hammer” and “potatoes taste good.”

The point of that barely-adequate illustration? If said person had no idea what a potato was, they couldn't have come up with mashed potatoes. A+B=C. They would have lacked the required conceptual raw materials to assemble the idea.

The more concepts you have in your mind, the more creative you can be. Think of knowledge as a pile of Lego bricks. The more of them you have, the more things you can build. Therefore, the first step to becoming a never-ending wellspring of creativity is to stockpile your mind with conceptual raw material. Yes, this means learning about the world and experiencing its many facets for yourself.
Or someone might simply have dropped or fallen on a potato, causing it to get smushed up. Not having so many potatoes available that they could let that one go to waste, they ate it anyway... and found that it was pretty good.

Reading fiction is easy, but reading to learn can be a challenge. And that's where most aspiring writers cut their own throats. They read novel after novel, usually in their preferred genre, thinking that it will have some impact on their own ideas. Reading non-fiction, especially if it has nothing to do with what you're planning to write, will give you a far greater creative advantage. I promise."
-http://www.writingforums.org/articles/where-do-ideas-come-from-ill-tell-you/
It's important to read in the genre you want to write so you know what's already been done. But general knowledge, especially in other sciences (assuming we're talking about science fiction), is critical. Isaac Asimov was a chemist for many years before he gave it up to write full time. He had a doctorate and taught at university, and took great care to educate himself in many scientific areas.
 
It's like this: At some point in history, someone looked at a potato, then looked at a hammer, and mashed potatoes were born. The idea of mashed potatoes didn't just fly into someone's head while they were playing with their kids. The idea was a synthesis of two existing concepts within the creator's mind; In this case, it may have been “I can smash things with a hammer” and “potatoes taste good.”
This analogy is funny, but I'd assume like most things in cooking the first mashed potatoes were actually created by accident, not because somebody had the "idea" to make them - which is exactly the other of the two major ways in which new things are generally being created.

But either way... @topic: Over the years this has become a well-known and much debated topic particularly in concept art communities, and to a lesser extend in other, visual arts. An "idea" is really just a combination of things that already existed, the more you know, the more things you have to "remix" from. Very often when people start doing art later in life, and after learning the basics of the craft they suddenly explode into a creative mastermind that's exactly the reason - they spent their early life doing a bit of everything, trying tons of stuff, learning about a lot of things in the process and now have a huge library to choose from. People often mistake that for "talent", but it's really the exact opposite - the bounty of exploring the world for years and years.
 
My Sci-Fi stories start in my dream journal, evolve with my sketchbook and writing notebook, and get scientifically built worlds when combining them on my computer (I have Chemistry and Biology AS degrees). After that point, my story becomes boring, until I get another inspiration.
 
Your advice then is to go with the dreamy inspiration and not get bogged on fleshing technical mechanisms

Or

Have an inspiration to have fun nerding out on the world building until it's fleshed, rinse repeat
 
Divine Inspiration.
 
OP makes a lot of sense, but I wouldn't dismiss "read more fiction". It's really good advice if you don't interpret it as "read more of your favorite author only in the one genre you want to write".
Nonfiction books are very useful for world building and basic elements, and you shoud have at least some knowledge of history and psychology to make plausible and interesting characters, but it won't help you much with things like pacing or your writing style. If you don't want your science fiction epic to read like a research paper you'll need to know a lot of fiction.
 
Nonfiction books are very useful for world building and basic elements, and you shoud have at least some knowledge of history and psychology to make plausible and interesting characters, but it won't help you much with things like pacing or your writing style. If you don't want your science fiction epic to read like a research paper you'll need to know a lot of fiction.
There’s plenty of extremely well-written non-fiction from which any aspiring novelist can learn how to improve the craft of her writing. Non-fiction isn’t a code of dry works.
 
Yeah, the key to being a creative is soaking in as much as you can. The ability to tell a good story comes ultimately from your ability to observe and characterize people. And that only comes with experience. Plus the greater the variety of viewpoints and sources you draw from, the less likely you are to fall into cliché and genre devices.

As Chuck Jones said:
 
Back
Top Bottom