- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 18,949
Loving all the people who voted for civs we haven't seen first looks for for... some reason....
Some people are as invested in the representation as they are in the mechanics. I like a little of both.
Loving all the people who voted for civs we haven't seen first looks for for... some reason....
I thought it would be The Inca, but then Mali comes along and now I don't know
My reasoning for Mali first is because I wanted them in the base game, and have been anticipating them. I picked them even before I knew the mechanics.Just out of curiosity: why is it so popular to pick civs that play differently (Maori, Mali) first?
Just out of curiosity: why is it so popular to pick civs that play differently (Maori, Mali) first? If I would choose a civ (what I won't do), I'd probably go for something like Greece or Rome first. Or one of the vanilla civs that got changed.
Aren't you just as curious about how the AI plays Maori and you want to meet them in your first game?Yeah, logically I should "replay" a current civ so that I can better understand the new mechanisms and what's changed. But I always like to try someone "new", and certainly trying the new civs with the crazy new mechanisms is just the most unique and different.
Aren't you just as curious about how the AI plays Maori and you want to meet them in your first game?
I am too, but I want a baseline on which to judge. I think I want to first to experience the new rules of the expansion without the uniqueness of a "weird" civ getting in the way of my perception.You could always put 2 of them in the game.But I am more curious how I would play the Maori.