Narz
keeping it real
Clearly how? IMO, the ends (short of murder) would justify the means. Assuming the ends are things like sabotaging tobacco processing plants, etc. (again, for all to keep in mind I am not endorsing such activities, simply discussing hypothetical scenerios).In some cases you have to fight and use violence, certainly. That's not the case with the tobacco companies however. In their case using violent or other extreme means is clearly inferior to legal methods.
-Drachasor
Going about things thru the courts would be a longer (ensuring more deaths in the meantime), though less risky, process.
If one had confidence one of succeed thru the illegal method it would be the best way to go, IMO (since it would be faster).
Hmm, that would kill a few unwitting "heroes of the cause" but ultimately might save millions of lives (people would be deathly, literally, afraid to smoke after that). Still, IMO, the murders could not be justified.Stealing cigarettes as an act of protest. How futile can you get?
You wanna fight "the man" do it right! Bomb their factories! Burn their fields!
Wait I have an even better idea. Poison their production lines!