While We Wait: Part 5

Ah, so once again this is one of those miraculous coincidences that when the opposition is using a popular message, a 26-year Washington insider just happens to suddenly adopt it. Right. And sheltering a supposedly strong, independent woman because you're afraid of the answers she gives is not sexism, but questioning her is! Those damn evil Democrats, always wrong and opposing the always right Republicans! How dare they!

It's all suddenly so clear to me now.

I'm Big Brother and I endorse this message.

Bush used change in his campaign in 2000. Kerry used it in 04. Clinton in 92. Don't start with me on how Obama is a big smarty who owns the rights to the word change. McCain has been using it for a long time, he usually uses another word in its place, Maverick.
 
McCain has been using it for a long time, he usually uses another word in its place, Maverick.
Ah, the other title he has no right to lay claim to. I think he should be referred to as Fourth Worst In his Naval Academy Class, but that might be too long. Maybe something more Native American, like Crashed Five Jets.
 
Ah, the other title he has no right to lay claim to. I think he should be referred to as Fourth Worst In his Naval Academy Class, but that might be too long. Maybe something more Native American, like Crashed Five Jets.

Crashing jets is much more exciting than community organizing.
 
Well damn, if that's your priority I guess you should start organizing the Osbourne/Stern '08 ticket right now.
 
Well damn, if that's your priority I guess you should start organizing the Osbourne/Stern '08 ticket right now.

Let's talk about how bias this debate was towards Biden. They even left Palin's mic on to see if she would slip up after it ended. Liberal scum.
 
CoD4, which i have played with friends and on-line, does require strategy, and a certain amount of skill. As in, you actually have to take cover instead of LOL I GOT THIS GUYZZ and the proceed to jump like an ass and throw grenades everywhere while shooting blindly (Halo).

Starcraft, yes, maybe, Warcraft 3 is also awesome (dota anyone?) I prefer RTS over almost ALL games.

MMORPGS on the other hand. I've played Guild Wars and the PvP is a joke compared.
Warhammer, i have not played :'( i want to, cause i want ot see if it will actually be better than WoW, however right now WoW arena (not PvE, raiding, leveling or any of that) takes MUCH more skill than Halo, which is simply point, shoot, and thats it.

Why?

WoW Arena takes an indepth knowledge of your class and ALL the other classes (the other 8) in the game. Unlike Halo, where you have a total of maybe 8 buttons to use, most of which you will only use on rare occasions, WoW arena requires you to use ALL, let me stress this, ALL your spells in response to rapidly changing circumstances. You have to anticipate the opponents attack and respond in kind and in some cases anticipate their anticipation. You have to keep running timers of the opponents cooldowns, diminishing returns timers, keep track of where they are so you don't get caught LOS of a shadow priest with a rogue on your ass and then get BLOWN UP in a stun lock with a blackout proc and a silence. I've lost matches because i was .5 of a secodn to late in cycloning a rogue on my rogue, causing my teammate to get kidneyshot nad WTH owned by a mage shatter combo while im siting there with my thumb up my nose in a Counter spell for 4 freakin seconds and then a blind (second blind after the trinket).

The reason why i think WoW Arena takes so much more skill than Halo (and in a lesser effect CoD4 but i still love CoD4), because you have to have so much knowledge in order to play it, and be using that knowledge within seconds of game play, while in Halo, you simply have to point and shoot or get the sniper rifle lol "I HAZ SNIPPERS LULUL WIN"

edit- lol its kinda funny that the only posts before this are pretty much lucky and symphony
 
Let's talk about how bias this debate was towards Biden. They even left Palin's mic on to see if she would slip up after it ended. Liberal scum.
omg juts liek when teh debat stratd n she askd "Kan I kal u 'Joe'??1" teh horrar, teh horrar!11
 
But also her mic was on and it was a personal question also a total impingement on free speech as also outlined in the Constitution, also. You are also a Liberal traitor.

Also.
 
WoW lucky you fail at supporting anything. Way to be a one line zinger like the rest of your sorry party.
 
But also her mic was on and it was a personal question also a total impingement on free speech as also outlined in the Constitution, also. You are also a Liberal traitor.

Also.

In noticed you said also 6 times, Bush did so and so 6 times while Obama did everything 3 times and I will make a run on sentence, because I am Joe Biden and I use numbers and not periods.

WoW lucky you fail at supporting anything. Way to be a one line zinger like the rest of your sorry party.

Go be useless to society and play WoW somemore.
 
In noticed you said also 6 times, Bush did so and so 6 times while Obama did everything 3 times and I will make a run on sentence, because I am Joe Biden and I use numbers and not periods.

You've got a point. Russia's threatened to nuke any world leader who does not use grammatically correct sentences.
 
because I am Joe Biden and I use numbers and not periods.
Speaking in the third person and statistics > lack of ability to speak English and hockey.
 
seriously there, saying palin won is like saying that canadian politics affects the rest of the world more than american politics. it just doesn't work.

also, as a canadian, i take offense to the usurping of hockey by palin. we shall have to beat you on home ice in 2010 to reclaim our honour. (and...win a stanley cup for once in 15 years :cry: )
 
omg juts liek when teh debat stratd n she askd "Kan I kal u 'Joe'??1" teh horrar, teh horrar!11

If something like this is made into a big thing, you can understand why someone would believe you're a partisan hack.

Some people didn't even need to watch the debate to "know" who won, in their oppinions... Because it is an oppinion deal. And partisan hacks will always side with their guy in these types of events.
 
so, lets take common attacks and look at them from the other side:

flip-flopping - improving on previous ideas

ignoring questions and facts - ?
 
If something like this is made into a big thing, you can understand why someone would believe you're a partisan hack.
Yes, because I was totally the one to raise the point of her microphone being on to begin with! You have acquired item: FAIL.
 
You really never understood that whole "evidence" idea, did you? You are aware there's this site called FactCheck.org, right? Try using it sometime. Otherwise, take your own advice and shut up because the only one acting ridiculous here is you. I've said this twice now.

Okay here is one. Reference USA Today

The claim: Biden said he has "always" supported clean coal. He said "a comment made at a rope line was taken out of context" by John McCain's campaign.

The facts: In the video, recorded at the beginning of Biden's bus trip across Ohio last week, he is seen responding to a question about why the campaign is supporting clean coal. "We're not supporting clean coal," he says. "Guess what? China is building two every week, two dirty coal plants. And it's polluting the United States, it's causing people to die."


And another:

Diplomacy

The claim: Biden said Obama did not say he would meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "This is simply not true about Barack Obama," he said. "He did not say sit down with Ahmadinejad."

The facts: At a news conference in New York City in September 2007, Obama was asked, "Senator, you've said before that you'd meet with President Ahmadinejad … would you still meet with him today?" He replied: "Yeah, nothing's changed with respect to my belief that strong countries and strong presidents talk to their enemies and talk to their adversaries."
 
Back
Top Bottom