flyingchicken
Deity
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2007
- Messages
- 3,783
Speaking of Pol Pot, has the question of whether fantasized immorality, say, in Never Ending Stories, have any bearing on one's overall morality the purity of one's soul, so to speak been ever considered fully? Although some of us may not believe in God or Karma or any other sort of ultimate, cosmic, poetic Justice which would rationally lead us towards the path of moral action, I can safely say that many of us are limited (to use a word like this, like the word "restrained," would imply a base animal nature in humans, something which is open to much debate; and to imply unrestrained and wanton behavior with animals does no justice to the most docile of beasts, the innocent victims, though such prejudices against animal-kind has been embedded deep within the human psyche; truly, much to be talked about) by societal norms, at least to some degree, and societal norms logically and irrefutably translate to morality, without a doubt.Pol Pot didn't execute intellectuals because they were a threat to his power, he killed them because they occasionally turn into raving lunatics as demonstrated above.
Is immorality within the perceived "safe" confines of role-playing, acceptable behavior? Is it morally neutral, or does it reflect a sinister streak, perhaps repressed?
Somewhat related: If a tree falls in a forest and no-one is around, does it make a sound? By our collective experience and scientific understanding that it should and would, while some would go as far as to say it will, but like Schrodinger's cat our Schrodinger's tree may or may not have made a sound as it had fallen; indeed, we should question whether or not it has truly fallen if no-one was around to listen.