Like I said:Oh, really? Napoleon, that reminds you of someone?
All right, he just remained neutral...

Like I said:Oh, really? Napoleon, that reminds you of someone?
All right, he just remained neutral...
Getting back to the growing list of returnees: how about Rameses II? A pharoah in these troubled times would be interesting.
BananaLee said:I thought it's generally accepted corvée labour (i.e. tax payments during the flood) was what built the pyramids, not slavery. :S
Yep. But you don't seem to understand that anything can be fixed by applying the right number of slaves to the problem!
BananaLee said:Particularly Hebrew slaves, it seems.
Yeah, sorry, my mistake."The Jews" don't have an army. Israel does, but Israel is not "the Jews"!
It wouldn't satisfy me though to confront him with his personal nightmare coming true, but it would answer some of my question regarding WW2, his view about human races and eugenics, what he was thinking about ******* up Germany and Europe as a whole and so on. And it would be interesting too to see if he would show some repentance after hearing the consequences of his actions.I'm not sure that Hitler's opinion would be worth a great deal. He wasn't exactly the most perceptive analyst of his own times, so I doubt he'd have much of value to say about today - although I suppose it would be satisfying to confront him with his own vilification.
Most truly great military heads of state got there by knowing when to fight as much as how. They're not going to start WWIII unless they think they can win. Although Napoleon has something of a track record in that regard.Yeah, but who would want Napoleon in charge? He would start WWIII. SAme for all great military heads of state