innonimatu
the resident Cassandra
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 15,338
I found an interesting paper trying to explain the differences in work hours between the US and Western Europe:
The paper argues that they are mostly a consequence of labour marked regulations. Europeans enjoy more leisure time, and tend to enjoy it in group. That has increased the enjoyment they derive from it, making europeans more inclined to give up the rewards of work for those of leisure.
It also repeats the old mantra linking GDP per capita and work hours (indeed the authors have recently published a book arguing for greater flexibility in the EU labour markets).
However they are also fair enough to make this observation:
Given how there are people from so many regions of the world on this forum I thought the subject might be worth discussing here.
My perspective is definitely a european one: I like my leisure time, and oppose that flexibility that is being (unsuccessfully, so far) pushed by several EU governments.
The article is worth reading even just for the statistical data in its appendixes which, interestingly, shows how difficult it is to find any single cause or simple explanation for the differences.
In the early seventies hours worked per person were about the same in the U.S. and in Western Europe (Europe in short). Today they are almost 50 per cent less in Europe than in the U.S. (Figure 1). Americans average 25.1 working hours per person in working age, Italians 16.7, French 18.0 and German 18.7. The average employed American works 46.2 weeks per year; the average French 40.5 the average Swede 35.4. While Americans work today just about as much as in 1970, Europeans work much less. Why?
The paper argues that they are mostly a consequence of labour marked regulations. Europeans enjoy more leisure time, and tend to enjoy it in group. That has increased the enjoyment they derive from it, making europeans more inclined to give up the rewards of work for those of leisure.
It also repeats the old mantra linking GDP per capita and work hours (indeed the authors have recently published a book arguing for greater flexibility in the EU labour markets).
However they are also fair enough to make this observation:
We conclude with an intriguing question. Are all these regulations and union policies (and taxation) suboptimal because they distort labor leisure decisions, or do they help solve a coordination problem? If a social multiplier exists because of complementarities in the consumption of leisure, then national policies that enforce higher levels of relaxation can, at least in theory, increase welfare. Perhaps everybody, on both sides of the Atlantic would like to work less but it is difficult to coordinate on a fewer hours equilibrium in competitive market where all workers act individually. According to this view, all would like more vacation if their friends, spouses and relatives also had them, but no coordination device is readily available.
Given how there are people from so many regions of the world on this forum I thought the subject might be worth discussing here.
My perspective is definitely a european one: I like my leisure time, and oppose that flexibility that is being (unsuccessfully, so far) pushed by several EU governments.
The article is worth reading even just for the statistical data in its appendixes which, interestingly, shows how difficult it is to find any single cause or simple explanation for the differences.