warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
The U.S.S. Butterface?
just not credible.The U.S.S. Butterface?
FTR I said "diversity/inclusiveness" and I think you missed some things... but whateves, its not that serious. Plus, @Valka D'Ur can speak for herself about what she meant.Lol, what? Other than "TAS had the first Native American crewmember", what else is there in that post that could be construed as anything other than "cool Star Trek facts"? Not that I'm knocking cool Star Trek facts btw, but I don't think when the first holodeck appeared in the franchise, when DeForest Kelly died, or if Robert April is cannon, have much to do with any wider concerns about diversity in society.
In the brig, where they belong.If diversity is so important in the federation, where are all the ugly people?
That's why i like Babylon 5, they went out of their way to find the oddest looking people for use as extras, mostly in down below(essentially space hobos)....and they didn't cast them as aliens either.
(essentially space hobos)
I like "Beggars are operating aboard the station... please do not encourage these professional beggars... if you have any spare credits, please give them to a registered charity."In the X Universe there is a background of "public service station announcements" when you are docked, and one of them is "If you bring any animals on board please be sure they are chained. Any loose animals will be vaporized on sight." I figure in the Star Trek universe they have a similar policy towards ugly people.
I like "Beggars are operating aboard the station... please do not encourage these professional beggars... if you have any spare credits, please give them to a registered charity."
You are correct. Up until TAS, there was no on-screen indication that Uhura ever had aspirations to command or to even sit in the Captain's chair at all. But if Kirk had given her temporary command in his absence or assigned her to take the night shift, she would have done so.I think the "finally" was a meta-reference to diversity/inclusiveness rather than a reference to anything in-character... seemed pretty clear to me, taking in context the rest of the post. You don't agree?
Oh, do excuse me for not engaging in "metapolytical analysis" (whatever that is).Dunno. The rest of the post seemed to be just "cool Star Trek facts" without much metapolytical analysis.
As with TOS, some episodes of TNG were shockingly misogynistic. Yar crying in frustration, the episode you referenced, the attitudes of the male crew toward Troi's pregnancy in "The Child" (an episode which I just rewatched less than 2 hours ago)... TNG isn't perfect, and these instances are part of the reason why I roll my eyes every time Picard or Riker go into one of their "we're SO enlightened" speeches.I just watched a jarringly misogynistic TNG episode The Perfect Mate. Picard is taking a stasis pod to a planet that will be used to create a peace settlement between warring worlds. The pod is broken open by nefarious Ferrangis and everyone find out that in the stasis pod is this empathic woman who is destined to become the perfect partner for whatever man she bonds with. And of course every man on the ship falls head over heels for her and she flirts nonstop with everyone. (I thought she was played by Cindy Crawford but it was really Famke Janssen)
She ends up falling in love with Picard while she is tutoring him for reasons and of course he's in love with her and just barely in control of himself. In the end, she was meant to bond with the delegate from the other side to seal the peace deal but she ends up bonding with Picard but goes through with her wedding to the delegate and pretends to bond with him because her bond with Picard instilled her with a sense of duty she cannot put aside.
Man it was cringe-worthy the whole way through. The only redeeming aspect was Stewart's acting and the confession he makes to Crusher about his feelings. That part was touching but the rest of the episode was terrible on so many levels.
But then it got followed shortly by The Inner Light where Picard lives an entire life time in a simulation left behind by a dead civilization. That episode is fantastic and really heartbreaking when you think about it. I don't see how anyone could come out of that experience entirely sane.
If you have some objection to or criticism of my posts, make them to me.Lol, what? Other than "TAS had the first Native American crewmember", what else is there in that post that could be construed as anything other than "cool Star Trek facts"? Not that I'm knocking cool Star Trek facts btw, but I don't think when the first holodeck appeared in the franchise, when DeForest Kelly died, or if Robert April is cannon, have much to do with any wider concerns about diversity in society.
They're called "aliens." And there's no question that the DiscoKlingons are hideous.If diversity is so important in the federation, where are all the ugly people?
Thank you.@Valka D'Ur can speak for herself about what she meant.
Was it as bad as the episode where Riker teaches the power heterosexual sex to the planet of the lesbian softball coaches? Because I remember that episode as being so much worse.I just watched a jarringly misogynistic TNG episode The Perfect Mate. Picard is taking a stasis pod to a planet that will be used to create a peace settlement between warring worlds. The pod is broken open by nefarious Ferrangis and everyone find out that in the stasis pod is this empathic woman who is destined to become the perfect partner for whatever man she bonds with. And of course every man on the ship falls head over heels for her and she flirts nonstop with everyone. (I thought she was played by Cindy Crawford but it was really Famke Janssen)
She ends up falling in love with Picard while she is tutoring him for reasons and of course he's in love with her and just barely in control of himself. In the end, she was meant to bond with the delegate from the other side to seal the peace deal but she ends up bonding with Picard but goes through with her wedding to the delegate and pretends to bond with him because her bond with Picard instilled her with a sense of duty she cannot put aside.
Man it was cringe-worthy the whole way through. The only redeeming aspect was Stewart's acting and the confession he makes to Crusher about his feelings. That part was touching but the rest of the episode was terrible on so many levels.
But then it got followed shortly by The Inner Light where Picard lives an entire life time in a simulation left behind by a dead civilization. That episode is fantastic and really heartbreaking when you think about it. I don't see how anyone could come out of that experience entirely sane.
I'm playing Reunion right now. I want to play through all the way to AP before I try Rebirth.I dunno what X game you play, but early on in the series there were "registered charities" that allowed you to buy reputation.
Remember the one where the Dr. Crusher falls in love with a guy name Odan who is a member of a Trill (or Trill-like) species? All to get us to the punch line at the end that Dr. Crusher don't swing that way...Was it as bad as the episode where Riker teaches the power heterosexual sex to the planet of the lesbian softball coaches? Because I remember that episode as being so much worse.
Apparently the writer intended the androgynous race Riker falls for to be played by male actors dressed up like early David Bowie but that never reached the casting director who interpreted "androgynous" as "butch lesbian" leading to an episode with the unfortunate implication that lesbianism can be solved by Riker's wide stance.
My use of "finally" was a reference to the fact that in all of TOS, Kirk never gave temporary command to any of the female officers even once (I don't count Number One, as she was under Pike's command, and as the First Officer, she would be expected to take temporary command as needed as a normal part of her duties).
Oh, do excuse me for not engaging in "metapolytical analysis" (whatever that is).![]()
If you have some objection to or criticism of my posts, make them to me.
I think it was worse than this episode but yeah this one was terrible as well.Was it as bad as the episode where Riker teaches the power heterosexual sex to the planet of the lesbian softball coaches? Because I remember that episode as being so much worse.
Apparently the writer intended the androgynous race Riker falls for to be played by male actors dressed up like early David Bowie but that never reached the casting director who interpreted "androgynous" as "butch lesbian" leading to an episode with the unfortunate implication that lesbianism can be solved by Riker's wide stance.
Was it as bad as the episode where Riker teaches the power heterosexual sex to the planet of the lesbian softball coaches? Because I remember that episode as being so much worse.
Apparently the writer intended the androgynous race Riker falls for to be played by male actors dressed up like early David Bowie but that never reached the casting director who interpreted "androgynous" as "butch lesbian" leading to an episode with the unfortunate implication that lesbianism can be solved by Riker's wide stance.
![]()
![]()
For some reason I'm picturing Riker (with his wide stance) in my living room at a lectern, giving a speech...