Why were no jets scrambled on 9-11?

[vonork]

Originally posted by Perfection
Not really because they're going to produce evidence that others are going to see.

That can be blamd as incompitence. That some high-level cordinator did not manage to draw a line between the dots.

 

[IglooDame]

And while we're discussing conspiracy theories, who thinks FDR let (or encouraged) the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor? Sims, there are too many parallels between the FDR Pearl Harbor conspiracy and your Bush 9-11 conspiracy. In fact... maybe the similarities aren't a coincidence? Maybe Bush knew about FDR's work and plagiarized it? Hmmmm....

 

[Speedo]

It was the Illuminati. We.. er, I mean they, set it up to keep Bush in power.

 

[Sinapus]

Originally posted by sims2789
9-11 was a great excuse to attack Iraq. he got the population scared and then told them that Iraq had ties to al Qaeda and that Saddam was a threat. "All you need to do to control the population is tell them that their security is at risk."

Nice theory. Any proof?

 

[thestonesfan]

Why were no jets scrambled on 9-11? Probably because they didn't fit in the frying pan.

 

[TubaGuy]

Originally posted by archer_007
The best question is why did Bush not let Congress investgate the attacks?

The last time we let Congress investigate a national event they decided that Magical, physics defying, bullet killed the President...

 

[Zardnaar]

Even if jets were scrambled what pilot is going to shoot down a civilian airliner? You would need a direct order form a general or president to do that. And the 1st 3 hours were confusing.

I'm no fan of Bush but this is just to whacked to be a conspiracy theory. Theres easier and less destructive ways to do it.

 

[Perfection]

Originally posted by vonork
That can be blamd as incompitence. That some high-level cordinator did not manage to draw a line between the dots.

So can the entriity of 9-11, without Bush ordering the attack!

Originally posted by Zeekater
Actually, the fact that Saddam DIDN'T change to the euro proves that he didn't support terrorism. If he had done that, that would have hurt the US a lot more than a few planes.

That's assuming that sole purpose was to destabalize the U.S. which is clearly untrue. And it gives only the most tenous support to Sims conjecture. Also, all of this occured AFTER 9-11 so there is no way that it could be the cause!

 

[Lefty Scaevola]

My information is that the hijacked jet that crashed in Penn. was being intercepted by fighter and order had been issued and confirmed for it to be shot down, and that it went down as a result of passenger action and few minutes befote intercept.

 

[vonork]

Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
My information is that the hijacked jet that crashed in Penn. was being intercepted by fighter and order had been issued and confirmed for it to be shot down, and that it went down as a result of passenger action and few minutes befote intercept.

Yepp, I belive that to be the case, but this has only created theories that it was shot down and then coverd up. Or shot down to cover up something else. Or whatever.

 

[Zeekater]

Originally posted by Perfection

That's assuming that sole purpose was to destabalize the U.S. which is clearly untrue. And it gives only the most tenous support to Sims conjecture. Also, all of this occured AFTER 9-11 so there is no way that it could be the cause!

I do not understand a word you just said.
Terrorism is not to destabalize a country?
It wasn't supposed to be a support to Sims conjecture.
What happened after 9-11?

 

[Sims2789]

if the one that crashed in Pennsylvania got shot down, so what? why were no jets scrambled on the ones that actually hit something. there used to be a Naval Air Station about 2 blocks from my house and the air above it was restricted airspace, and any plane that were to fly over it would have been escorted by fighter, and, if necesary, shot down. i'm sure that the pentagon means more to the Military than does one naval air base on a tiny island.

 

[Sims2789]

Originally posted by Sinapus


Nice theory. Any proof?

simple. Bush talks about invading Iraq before 9-11. his buddies also want to. Cheney and Rummy supported doing on the day of 9-11. 7 of the so-called hijackers were proven to be alive. this means that the people who actually hijacked that plane weren't the ones the Feds said they were. a terrorist organization wouldn't do that. we wanted to build an oil pipeline through Afganistan, and prevent Iraq from switching over to the Euro(which would create massive inflation causing the Rich to get poorer) and suddenly both countries get the blame for 9-11.

 

[Sims2789]

Originally posted by Perfection
1)According to that it happened last november, did Bush use a time maachine to tell himself earlier to destroy the WTC?

2)Not really because they're going to produce evidence that others are going to see.

1)it happened in Novemeber 2000, so your statement makes abosolutely no sense.

2)the few conspiritors could again use their chokepoints to prevent the evidence from trickling down the chain of command and to the people.

 

[Sinapus]

Originally posted by sims2789


simple. Bush talks about invading Iraq before 9-11. his buddies also want to. Cheney and Rummy supported doing on the day of 9-11. 7 of the so-called hijackers were proven to be alive. this means that the people who actually hijacked that plane weren't the ones the Feds said they were. a terrorist organization wouldn't do that. we wanted to build an oil pipeline through Afganistan, and prevent Iraq from switching over to the Euro(which would create massive inflation causing the Rich to get poorer) and suddenly both countries get the blame for 9-11.

So basically, broadbrushed speculation colored by your dislike of Bush and no real proof or answer to my question. Thanks.

 

[Perfection]

Originally posted by sims2789
1)it happened in Novemeber 2000, so your statement makes abosolutely no sense.

Well then it still doesn't work. Because if the goal is to make a strong dollar, destroying American consumer confidence with a terrorist attack is not going to work. Any damage created by a currency shift would pale to the destruction of consumer confidence that Sept 11 created.

Originally posted by sims2789
2)the few conspiritors could again use their chokepoints to prevent the evidence from trickling down the chain of command and to the people.

A conspiricy of the size needed woulkd require hundres of Americans do you honeslty thing noone would spill after thousands died.

All, you are doing is pointing out ways Bush could have bennefited from it. Doesn't mean he did it. Find a shred of evidence that isn't an teneous tie that Bush had to the war.

 

[eyrei]

So, tell us Lefty, was it really the Illuminati?

 

[Pontiuth Pilate]

Some mod please close this thread, if only out of pity! The poor guy is just copying crap off of websites without a clue... such a bunch of BS that it's not even funny anymore.

OK, it is Now excuse me while I adjust my metal headgear to receive Fox and talk radio...

Oh, and just to dispel a popular illusion. Lefty isn't in charge of us, er, I mean, them.... He's just a senior member. In reality we are led by the fiendishly clever entity [a super-intelligent shade of the color mauve] known to these boards only as Vietcong...

 

[Mrogreturns]

I've said it before and I'll say it again- ALL these conspiracy theories are crap. They are lies spread by a conglomeration of government, big business and organised religion (although these are, of course, only the visible puppets of the Illuminati) with the purpose of distracting us from the real issues. What are the real issues? I don't know- I've been distracted!

 

[oedo]

Originally posted by sims2789
7 of the so-called hijackers were proven to be alive.

source?