Will this be the electoral map in 2004?

mazzz

Emperor
Joined
Jan 19, 2003
Messages
1,198
Location
Chicago, Illinois
After seeing the results of this poll I spent 45 seconds making this map in paint. Does anyone think this could be the map in 2004?
(I also put the 2000 electoral map there so it can easily be compared)

bush-kerry.JPG
 
No. New Mexico will go for Bush this year. So will New Hampshire. Kerry has no chance in Missouri or Nevada. The other two are at least close.

As for Ohio and Florida, those are going to be the toss-up states that determine the election. Iowa and Wisconsin are leaning Kerry but need to be secured to give the Democrats any chance of winning.
 
New Mexico to Bush? Gore won it in 2000 and kerry is winning 48.4 to 43.3, thats out side the margin of error

Kerry had a ten percent lead in NH
49 to 39

in Ohio 49 to 44

51 to 43 in Wisconsin


and even if he loses Flordia and Iowa he will still win if he keeps the states above
 
Okay, after looking at that link, my reaction is mixed. It is the Wall Street Journal, which usually has a Republican bias, but it is also online polling, which is a lot less accurate and much more untested than traditional polling methods, which are not showing the same results.

Plus, its still early. Regan's death and the increase in Reagan worship and nostaglia will create a huge bump in Bush's poll numbers and Bush will have a lot of things in his favor come September, from the convention boost to greater funding to a much better political organization on the ground and, most likely, an improved economy.
 
We need to start seeing some states colored in green (Libertarian, not Green Party)
 
Godwynn said:
We need to start seeing some states colored in green (Libertarian, not Green Party)

Exactly correct. Recently I have read that around 15% of the Alaskan population voted for the libertarian party so there is some chance one state might eventually vote libertarian.
 
Looks like Kerry gets all the important states except Texas.
 
Free Enterprise said:
Exactly correct. Recently I have read that around 15% of the Alaskan population voted for the libertarian party so there is some chance one state might eventually vote libertarian.

All we really need is one state, most people have never heard of the Libertarian Party. If one state goes Green, I think their popularity will burst like a zit on a teenager's face.
 
As a Libertarian Party Member, I must say that I concur with your hopes.

Are the two of you (Free Enterprise & Godwynn) party members?
 
I'm not sure if I want that to happen, even though I share much of the Libertarians beliefs. If the libertarian party does become the third party America is looking for, I can only see it taking away from the Democrats base while getting no Republicans whatsoever to it's side..
 
Republicans are traditionally more sympathetic to Libertarian positions.
 
SeleucusNicator said:
No. New Mexico will go for Bush this year. So will New Hampshire. Kerry has no chance in Missouri or Nevada. The other two are at least close.

As for Ohio and Florida, those are going to be the toss-up states that determine the election. Iowa and Wisconsin are leaning Kerry but need to be secured to give the Democrats any chance of winning.

So what really matters is if Catherine O'Harris is the election commisioner again?
 
Sims2789 said:
So what really matters is if Catherine O'Harris is the election commisioner again?

If Kerry wins all of the Gore states (except New Mexico, which I'm still classifying as safe for Bush) plus Ohio, he can win the election without Florida.

However, if Bush takes Iowa or Wisconsin, Kerry needs both Florida and Ohio. If Bush takes Ohio or Pennslyvania, the election is over.
 
Michigan has a strong number of Republicans, but it is a Democratic lock no matter how many analysts label it a "battle-ground" state. So many large cities here have universities and are otherwise very liberal places... Detroit's mayor is a Democrat... and Bush's ad campaign has been anything but convincing... Kerry shouldn't waste much money on us.
 
Plus Michigan has been hard hit with job losses.

While mazzz's map is on the fringes of some kind of possibility, I don't think it would be very possible for Kerry to get BOTH Ohio and Florida as well as pick up Missouri and New Hampshire while only losing Iowa. I think it's much more likely that Kerry will pick up either Ohio or Florida (and I'm leaning Ohio) and perhaps forgo the other states while retaining Pennsylvania.
 
Back
Top Bottom