Zkribbler
Deity
I use "befuddled" a lot, as in "I yam befuddled,"Befuddled, bemoaned
I use "befuddled" a lot, as in "I yam befuddled,"Befuddled, bemoaned
I’m neither a chef nor dockworker but my spoken language can be pretty colorful!I swear chefs are possibly the most volatile speakers outside of the infamous dock workers stereotype .
It’s not for me, really. I’ll give another example of my own life: utilize.This question is a bit of a paradox. If I knew them, I'd probably use them.
“Bespoke.”
Something about it just irritates me. I can’t explain it well.
It’s not for me, really. I’ll give another example of my own life: utilize.
I dropped the words [cigarette] and gay (as in, that's so gay) from my vocabulary. Both of those words almost always meant asshat and lame, respectively, and not homosexual. It took a while though because it was slang I grew up with and I had to come to grips that no matter how I used the words, they were hurtful and derogatory.
"Utilize" should have slightly different connotations than "use." It should be saved for cases where something is used in an unusual, practical, or particularly beneficial way. Hence it's producing the extra utility connoted by "utilize." For example, "I utilized the laser pointer from my presentation as a cat toy". You certainly could just say "I used" instead and it wouldn't change the sentence much, but I'd say "utilized" is appropriate in this case.It’s not for me, really. I’ll give another example of my own life: utilize.
It means the same thing as “use.”
I will fight anybody on this topic.
Acronyms Seriously Suck:
There is a creeping tendency to use made up acronyms at SpaceX. Excessive use of made up acronyms is a significant impediment to communication and keeping communication good as we grow is incredibly important. Individually, a few acronyms here and there may not seem so bad, but if a thousand people are making these up, over time the result will be a huge glossary that we have to issue to new employees. No one can actually remember all these acronyms and people don't want to seem dumb in a meeting, so they just sit there in ignorance. This is particularly tough on new employees.
That needs to stop immediately or I will take drastic action - I have given enough warning over the years. Unless an acronym is approved by me, it should not enter the SpaceX glossary. If there is an existing acronym that cannot reasonably be justified, it should be eliminated, as I have requested in the past.
For example, there should be not "HTS" [horizontal test stand] or "VTS" [vertical test stand] designations for test stands. Those are particularly dumb, as they contain unnecessary words. A "stand" at our test site is obviously a test stand. VTS-3 is four syllables compared with "Tripod", which is two, so the bloody acronym version actually takes longer to say than the name!
The key test for an acronym is to ask whether it helps or hurts communication. An acronym that most engineers outside of SpaceX already know, such as GUI, is fine to use. It is also ok to make up a few acronyms/contractions every now and again, assuming I have approved them, e.g. MVac and M9 instead of Merlin 1C-Vacuum or Merlin 1C-Sea Level, but those need to be kept to a minimum.
I almost never use "ignorant" or "literally" in the way they've come to be used the last 10-20 years. I still use "literally" according to its dictionary definition, but I've basically dropped "ignorant" from everyday speech.
The old definition. I hadn't realized any dictionaries were literally changing the definition of literally.The new or the old definition of literally?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-23729570/why-editors-are-literally-changing-the-dictionary