World War III Scenario

What did u thinked of the scenario?

  • It was very very good

    Votes: 4 21.1%
  • it was ok

    Votes: 6 31.6%
  • it was veeeery bad

    Votes: 5 26.3%
  • what am i doing here

    Votes: 4 21.1%

  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .
I cxould understand that, Saddam isnt excatly liked, Its more of a need to keep the US out of Iraq instead of supporting saddam hussien. Perhaps a leader from a well liked nation like Saudi Arabia?
 
it doesnt really matter, jsut put in the story that is a great leader who believes in modernization and continued religious dominance, make up a name, he can come up from any nation
 
indeed, the main flaws with the muslim states is that they either modernize or they stay with religion and get their arse kicked badly like afganistan. what if a leader was religious and could move his people but also modernized? that would be interesting... either way that scenario aint coming anytime soon.
 
yeah, I got the USA, EU, CIS, Japan, Both chinese nations and japan's cities done, but not units yet.
 
This is an Impressive and well-built scenario, but I had a few problems:

- The Russian Federation had far too few cities and I found myself unable to play as them very well since you cant build settlers and I am a diplomat in my games.
- The Neutrals are a bit too powerful, after a while they use the fact that they are spread out to build up and they become an enormous threat. Cutting down their production capabilities would make it a bit more realistic.
- Lastly, there are too few cities on the map, but at least it doesent take very long to load up.

Despite these setbacks, this is quite an interesting scenario to play.
 
well it was my first scenario, but plz try "october fury, soviet invasion of europe" or the otehr one, ull like it
 
im back from europe. I let sarevok make the ww3 scenario while i was gone and i think it is almost done, if not done already. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom