How weird. Not what I was expecting.
Economic Left/Right: -3.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
Yeah, the problem is that you have to interpret the meaning of a lot of the questions. They are too vague. For example,
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
What they are really asking is...
"If economic globalisation is inevitable, we should tax the living crap out of them to fund massive social programs rather than let the corporations that make the profits keep those profits."
If you agree, you chose Socialism.
If you disagree, you chose Free Market.
It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who simply manipulate money and contribute nothing to their society.
Again...
"It is regrettable that many personal fortunes are made by people who aren't taxed to death in order to fund massive social programs and instead are permitted to keep their income and become wealthy."
If you agree, you chose Socialism.
If you disagree, you chose Free Market.
Protectionism is sometimes necessary in trade.
Some people don't understand this question. Protectionism is a position on economics that promotes higher tariffs on imported goods in order to protect domestic industry from being harmed due to the inability to compete with the lower prices of said imported goods.
There are many reasons that domestic industry might not be able to compete. Among these are labor costs being higher for domestic industry than for the imported goods' producers. Another could be that the quality of imported goods is worse.
Therefor, the statement becomes, "It is sometimes necessary to maintain tariffs (taxes) against foreign goods in order to protect domestic industry."
I am not entirely certain how they gauge your answer with respect to your economic position. Typically, protectionism is a position of the right, but I just can't say for sure.