schlaufuchs

The French are fully opening their Archives next year. Classified stuff stays that way for 100 years.

Happy birthday, man!

Happy Birthday!

Thanks. It's one worth keeping clean.

It's all good. I was reading your post and was thinking "yeah, this sounds about right..."

I think you might have missed a "not" in the journalist thread.

PM me if I'm trashing your wall. I figure you're well mannered enough to let me know if I am yet we're sweet enough not to worry about replies.

Rockin' cover. Takes toe tapping to new levels
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOxGCxoNTMw&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Hey. Thought you may like this and it's a little different to some other music I've sent you, and with your Welsh ancestry even moreso (even though it's a traditional English ballad).

Don't know if you are familiar with Fairport Convention but their album Leige and Leif is considered the most influential record in folk rock fusing traditional folk songs with electric instruments.

What I love about this is the way the rhythm section drives it, not something I associate with folk music. The bass is hypnotic, the drums are "on the one" to the point it's almost a little funky. I am obsessed with Sandy Denny's vocals (fun fact...this is the chick voice on Battle of Evermore) and Richard Thompsens guitars are always interesting and tasteful.

Dark lyrics too

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK_7AqH1VGQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

EDIT....on closer inspection the sound quality is average and the rhythm section is not done justice

Sorry that you can't identify a sandbox game for what it is, brah. If they wanted to build a responsive simulation in an arctic wasteland you'd think something important like, I dunno, temperature might've been included out of the box instead of having to be modded in. Bethesda does not care about giving you an immersive "RPG experience" (whatever that is) and hasn't for like a decade.

Mind you, I'd like some more interactivity too, but it's really, really clear they don't give a damn and complaining won't change their minds, because it's not really part of their design doc and reqs.

So... who is the quad-tych of thread-destroyers? Dying fans are dying to know.

I didn't know that you were referring to Neomega specifically but I got your point nonetheless. I wasn't on CFC when he went on his rampage so I guess I wouldn't know. But I completely agree that seriously effed up posts can stay up for a long time even in a place with the traffic of the Tavern because there are no mods around. As for all of the inactive mods - why are they even still listed as staff? It seems to me a common sense rule would be 6+ months of inactivity costs you your modship. In any case, they need some new ones but there is an awful short list of OTers who could or would do it.

At this point I'm glad they still keep that thread open. Once Akka started posting about how butthurt he is about the ban he got over trolling me, then Neomega joined in with The Jews Did It! and finally Oruc started whining about how he never wins a debate with anyone I thought they were going to lock it.

lolwtf massive post of glorious victory

Thanks!

Thanks! Being relatively new to OT, I have been confused these last couple of days with the change

I reduced coffee because I was having headaches with all that coffee and headaches and lots of caffeine usually go together before developing an aneurism. I can't drink coffee without some sort of sweetener, which increases my chances of getting diabetes. I am already predisposed to diabetes because 1) my grandfather and mom have it and 2) my medicine makes me more likely to get diabetes.

Would you happen to know what gender Crezth is?

I thought it'd be on the site, just couldn't find it.

(Love you. Thanks. <3)

Hi Owen. Could you perchance please share the 1081 movies list you claim to have? Your sig made me google in insanity but I couldn't find any proper thingbeinglist.

In El Chamberpotó.

Thanks for the (direct) backup.

I'm trying to figure out how to communicate with a handful of users without being drawn into the morass of responding to every single personal opinion that rapidly devolves into an annoying quote war.

Why are you bothering to argue with someone who literally believes that they know not only better than you, but better than the Supreme Court and constitutional scholars what the Constitution means? (Whatever they think it should mean)