14th/15th Century Explorers

Ansar

Détente avec l'été
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
10,555
Location
Ithaca, NY (soon)
Can anyone list all 14th and 15th century explorers?

I need for History class. :crazyeye:

I got some:Prince Henry the Navigator
---------- Magellan
Vasco de Game
Christopheer Columbus

what other are there?
 
Main ones I know, by country (but be careful the countries they worked for, not automatically their country of origin) :

English : Cabot
French : Cartier, Verrazano
Spain : Colombus, Amerigo Vespucci (--> hence the name "America"), Magellan (at sea), Coronado, Cortez, de Soto, Pizarro, Orellana, Almagro (land conquests/explorations)
Portugal : Vespucci (yes he worked for different countries at different times), Cabral
 
My favourite conquistador:
Alvaro Nunez Cabesa de Vacca
You just have to love a guy called "Cow's head" :lol:

Especially since he actually liked the Indians. His first "entrada" was a complete cock-up, leaving him entirely at the mercy of the natives. (He became the focus of a shamanistic religious movement along the Gulf of mexico without ever quite realising it.)

Lots of sites like this one out there about exploration (not too much info, the basics):
http://www.win.tue.nl/cs/fm/engels/discovery/

If you need more:
http://www.mce.k12tn.net/explorers/explorers.htm
 
AnsarKing101 said:
So what did Henry do then?
Set up a state of the art navigation school and comission people to get out there and see what they could find if I remember correctly.

He was the guy who financed explorers.:goodjob:
 
Not really. Without him and his supports, no doubt many explorations would have been at least delayed. Not everybody can be on the ships, some have to pay for the ships and for you ! :)
 
Zeng-He perhaps. 1451 if I remeber correctly. Went to the Americans past India and to South Africa.
 
silver 2039 said:
Zeng-He perhaps. 1451 if I remeber correctly. Went to the Americans past India and to South Africa.

*pounds head*

Yes, there was a Chinese sailor named Zheng He. But he went mainly on trade voyages, through the Indian ocean. He never went far past Zanzibar, NEVER went to the Americas. And it was in the early 1400s.
 
14th-15h would be 1300-1500

Zheng He didn't go beyond Africa

Add:
Marco Polo, Venetian (14th century)
Nicolo de' Conti, Venetian Merchant, went all the way to Sumatra and Java in the early 15th centuries. Of course, Asian already knew about them.

Portuguese African explorers:
Gil Eannes, Portuguese, rounded Cape Bojador (about a third of the way down the coast of what is now Rio de Oro) in 1434, thus beginning the exploration of Africa's west coast, or rather resuming, since Hanno and possibly the Phoenician circumnavigators had been there before. In 1444 he discovered Cape Blanco (a third of the way down the coast of Mauritania, where Nouadhibou is now), from which he brought 200 slaves.
Dinis Dias reached Cape Verde in 1445, which meant he had finally reached someplace that wasn't desert.
Alvise de Cadamosto discovered the Cape Verde Islands and went up the Gambia and Senegal Rivers in 1457.
Prince Henry died in 1460.
In 1469, King Alfonso V made a 5-year contract with Ferñao Gomes to discover an additiona 500 miles per year. Gomes fulfilled his contract. One of his captians, Ferñao da Po discovered Bioko (formerly Fernando Po) at the point where Africa turns south again.
Diogo Cão reached the mouth of the Congo on his 1482 voyage, and Cape Cross, half way down the coast of Namibia, in 1485.
Bartolomeu Dias rounded tip of Africa in 1488 and landed in Mossel Bay
Finally, Vasco de Gama made it all the way to India in 1498.
There's a long list of these explorers on Wikipedia under "European exploration of Africa".

Afonso da Paiva and Pero da Covilhã went to Aden in the late 1480s. DaPaiva went to Ethiopia and da Covilhã to Calicut.

Diego Dias was the first European to visit Madagascar, sometime in the early 1500s.

Some others: The Azores were discovered in 1427 by one of Prince Henry's captains, possibly Gonçalo Velho. Nobody's quite sure who discovered Bermuda or Madeira, or the Canaries. The last two were known in ancient times.

Ascension Island was discovered by João da Nova Castelia in 1501 and named by Albuquerque a couple years later. João da Nova Castelia also discovered St. Helena (Napoleon's deathplace), in 1502.

Tristan da Cunha was discovered, believe it on not, by Tristão da Cunha, in 1506.

The Falklands weren't discovered until 1600.
 
North King said:
*pounds head*

Yes, there was a Chinese sailor named Zheng He. But he went mainly on trade voyages, through the Indian ocean. He never went far past Zanzibar, NEVER went to the Americas. And it was in the early 1400s.

True, but he did also explore the East Indies. And though much of his travels west were already known via the travels of Ibn Battuta, for the Chinese Zheng He was the first to attempt those routes on any scale. I'd say he ought to be included for his real voyages (although I agree that the American theory is more bestseller fiction written in an imitation of historical scholarship). Also, 1400s is smack-dab in the middle of the timeframe specified in the thread (14th/15th centuries).

Another I would include:

Ibn Battuta
 
Henry did not, in fact, found the School of Navigation that is commonly attributed to him. However, he did finance many expeditions. This was easy since he was the apostolic administrator of the Order of Christ, a chivalric order which inherited the property of the Knights Templar in Portugal. This was why Portuguese ships of exploration had white sails with a red cross.

Note that the main expeditions within Henry's lifetime were to Madeira and the Azores, which had already been discovered but were systematically settled during this period. Henry died in 1460, before the really important voyages of exploration. These were commissioned by King Manuel I "the Fortunate", so he would really be a more appropriate person to thank for all this. Henry's significance was really as someone who helped to foster the ethos and ideal of exploration, rather than as someone who contributed materially to the great expeditions or actually went anywhere.
 
what about bearing *sp* the russian guy

and wearnt thear a few expodisons by the russians into alaska and down to calliefonai
 
Actually Simon(?) Deshnev went through the Behring Straits in 1648 although he apparently didn't make it to Alaska. Still too late, though.

Jan Mayen was actually discovered by Henry Hudson in 1607. Novaya Zembla was apprently known a lot earlier.

Willem Barentz discovered Spitzbergen in 1596.

Giovanni da Verrazano sailed the coast of North America from South Carolina to Rhode Island in 1524. He discovered New York Bay and the Narrows but didn't find the Hudson River. Somehow he managed to miss Chesapeake Bay.
 
Plotinus said:
Note that the main expeditions within Henry's lifetime were to Madeira and the Azores, which had already been discovered but were systematically settled during this period. Henry died in 1460, before the really important voyages of exploration. These were commissioned by King Manuel I "the Fortunate", so he would really be a more appropriate person to thank for all this. Henry's significance was really as someone who helped to foster the ethos and ideal of exploration, rather than as someone who contributed materially to the great expeditions or actually went anywhere.

It's all a matter of degree, for me. It's like calling the early colonial Portuguese empire primitive, which it certainly was, when compared to other European empires 200 years later. However it was a product of its time, and not of less importance for being so. In this light, I don't view the explorations under Henry as being less important than what came later.

It can be plausibly argued that Henry's role in history really represents the beginning of the the Portuguese, and ergo European colonial empires. It is generally accepted that it was the Infante Dom Henrique who master-minded the capture of Ceuta in 1415, which is the beginning of the Portuguese occupation of Morrocan cities along the coast. Of course the historical account has Henry landing on the beach first, getting lost in the city of Ceuta by himself, running down the streets with his sword for hours, fighting etc... so there is a mythological realm to the the story, but undoubtedly he had a vision of expansion, and the taking of Ceuta was his idea and an event which he led and participated in. At this point, Portugal began expanding outside of Iberia, into Africa. This would be the greatest "action" we could attribute to him, IMO.

As Grandmaster of the Ordem de Cristo, Henry was able to sponsor further exploration down the West African coast, from Portugal, and usually from the Algarve. The efforts in exploration during Henry's lifetime were due to Henry. Afonso V, "o Africano", named for his exploits in Morocco, which were a direct result of Henry's impetus, and who ruled during some of Henry's lifetime, did little for exploration after Henry's death. In many ways Afonso V was an old fashioned, medieval king. His perspective was medieval. Henry was altogether different. With Henry gone, there was little exploration from Afonso, even though he fought extensively in Morocco. Henry is unquestionably the great figure in Portuguese exploration IMO, even though he wasn't on the ships, because of his vision.

Manuel I, "o Fortunado", is greatly exaggerated by many who do not understand why he was so fortunate: he reaped the benefits of Dom Joao II, "the perfect prince", who was probably the greatest Portuguese monarch, and the benefits from Henry's earlier efforts. IMO Manuel's reign often represents the apogee of the Portuguese empire (though personally I would argue for Dom Joao II, perhaps for somewhat more idealized reaons), but Manuel was not the greatest monarch, just a very fortunate and wealthy one, in the right place and the right time. There are greater figures in Portuguese history from the 1400's and 1500's, like the Infante Dom Henrique, Dom Joao II, Vasco de Gama, Afonso de Albuquerque, Cabral... I don't see Manuel as a great figure in exploration (Manuel's period, yes, but not Manuel persay), certainly not more so than Henry in the realm of sponsorship, and Manuel did not have Henry's singular genius. Henry died heavily in debt for his explorations, at a time when it was something new. I see Manuel as the great inheritor of Dom Joao II, and belonging to a world where the concept of a global empire was already being very firmly established; the great inheritor indeed, "o fortunado".
 
What I find really interesting about Explorers and their backers from these times is their mindset and perception of the world that lay out there. Here are some titbits which all link together to give an insight:

1) WRONG GEOGRAPHY: This gives us a rough idea of what Colombus thought the world looked like.


TITLE: Sketch maps of the equatorial belt of the world
DATE: 1503-06/1516-22
AUTHOR: Bartolommeo Columbus and Alessandro Zorzi
DESCRIPTION: Christopher Columbus was marooned in Jamaica for almost one year during his fourth voyage. From there on July 7, 1503, he wrote a letter to King Ferdinand, reporting on his exploration of Nicaragua and Panama. A copy of the letter was brought to Rome in 1506 by Columbus's brother, Bartholomew [a.k.a. Bartolommeo], who had accompanied the Admiral on this final voyage. Bartholomew was seeking the Pope's support to persuade the King of Spain to grant a commission for colonizing and Christianizing the Central American coast.

From here: http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/Ren/Ren1/Reno.html

Which is PACKED with maps, sketches and noted by the very explorers themselves. CLICK IT!

----------------

2) "MONSTERS" and "HEROES":
Medieval geography placed Europe at the center of the world, with all other people and places falling at the periphery. This perception of the world led to an ethnocentrism that defined the European mode of looking at the world. Westerners considered themselves the standard for comparing all other people and places. Thus, people falling outside the confines of the known and controlled west were perceived as strange, deviant, and essentially monstrous.

Westerners regarded these deviant monsters with a combination of fascination and revulsion. Although Europeans perceived monsters and horrible and uncivilized, they were still irrevocably drawn to them as well. They reveled in descriptions of bizarre cultures and characteristics that differred so markedly from their own.

Cynocephali - Dog-headed people who communicate through barking. They are carnivourous hunters dressed in animal skins. According to some legends, they have huge teetch and can breathe fire.

From The Medieval World View
These explorers were heroes for obvious reasons. They, and the whole society which surrounded them, really believed that there were all kinds of monsters out there. All kinds of tales tell of men with tusks, or men with pig's heads or any other kind of monstrosity of the imagination. Here are some examples:

*A Munster Ptolemaic map of the Pakistan/Afghanistan area, 1540*

See the whole thing here.

----------------

3)
"Most medieval maps were not meant to get someone from one place to another. They were not objects that were carried around in the vest pocket of the weary traveller. Quite to the contrary, most medieval maps were either works of art hanging on cathedral walls meant to show the grandeur of Creation, or illustrations in manuscripts describing the characteristics of Creation. Like most artifacts of the Middle Ages, maps are rare. And, while we know a great deal about medieval maps, any discussion of this kind must begin with the simple caveat that we cannot know about what has not survived. We must work with what we have.

source Not a great source but he raises some good points.

----------------

4) King Manuel I (b. 1469, d. 1521) believed old legends which described India as a rich Christian kingdom on the eastern rim of the Muslim world. Manuel hoped to contact the Christian King of India, and to negotiate with him an anti-Muslim military alliance.

It was not easy for King Manuel to choose a leader for the planned expedition to India. The most experienced man available was Captain Bartholomew Diaz, who had sailed all the way down the west coast of Africa in 1488, reaching the southern tip of that continent. Unfortunately, Diaz had proved incapable of suppressing a mutiny. After rounding the Cape of Good Hope, Diaz had ordered his sick and starving men to sail on to India, but they had refused to obey him, and he had reluctantly agreed to turn back.

King Manuel, feeling that a more forceful commander was needed for his new expedition around Africa, selected Captain-Major Vasco da Gama, who seemed unlikely to tolerate any mutinies. {Vasco da Gama} was a grim, cynical man, notoriously merciless, an expert at torturing prisoners.

To make use of the experience of Bartholomew Diaz, King Manuel put him in charge of organizing and planning the new expedition. He ordered Diaz to spare no expense to make sure that Vasco da Gama would be properly equipped. Diaz oversaw the building of two new ships for the expedition to India, and he had two older ships refurbished. All the ships were armed with the improved cannon that had recently been developed in western Europe. Diaz made certain that the ships of the new expedition carried enough food to supply their crews for three years with generous rations of wine, salt beef, biscuits, lentils, sardines, plums, almonds, onions, garlic, mustard, salt, sugar, and honey.

This kind of map is the result of those expeditions. This particular one is an Italian map of "Calecut" by Giordano Ziletti. DATE: 1564



----------------

5) Here you can see the routes taken out of Western Europe by such explorers:



----------------

6) This is the kind of map Muslims were making during the same time period. I can't make head nor tail of it to be frank. (South is at the top btw)

al-Istakhri's world map, Arabic, 977/1570 A.D.*
oriented with South at the top
 
Interesting maps Ram ;) The monsters are imaginative too

Rambuchan said:
4) King Manuel I (b. 1469, d. 1521) believed old legends which described India as a rich Christian kingdom on the eastern rim of the Muslim world. Manuel hoped to contact the Christian King of India, and to negotiate with him an anti-Muslim military alliance.

Yes, this is the legend of Prester John, common in the medieval world. The Portuguese initially seemed to believe that Ethiopia was actually this kingdom when they learned about it, because it was Christian. Christovao de Gama, Vasco's brother, died leading a famous last stand of 400 Portuguese and Christian Ethiopians against the Left-handed Granye, their muslim opponent, who had some Ottoman support IIRC, thus saving the Christian kingdom. I believe Gibbon does a good write up of it lol.

nice write up about de Gama and Dias btw
 
Back
Top Bottom