A Brave New World Part 2

Sorry, I am back.

To Sauk and Fox
CC: the World
Sauk, you are responable for suppresing a culture that could help your overall nation while Fox started the war unprepared and suffered the consequences. If Fox promises to not fight the Sauk and the Sauk give the Istani more freedoms we are done and we can move to the future. However, if the Fox agrees, they can join under a looser Sauk Leadership.


Im confused, who are you?
 
From: King James II, Kingdom of Tennessee
To: Saulk, Fox, France, Nations concerned about the Saulk-Fox War


We are disturbed by this rise in instability to the north. We encourage all parties to seek peace.

While we are certain France can find alternate routes easily as the French protectorate of Louisiana reaches from the coast to the battle ground. However, the Kingdom of Tennessee cannot tolerate substantial foreign military forces passing by our population centers. As such be aware that we will obstruct any military convoy attempting to traverse up river along our border.
 
To: Mexico, Virginia, Deseret, whom it may concern
From: The Imperium of France
Re: Sauk-Fox War


Such displays of hypocrisy we have not seen in an age. Virginia, you can halt your meaningless rhetoric this instant, as not two years ago you attacked and annexed a nation on very dubious charges. In this instance, Fox has attacked another sovereign nation, a sovereign nation which in no way violated any international treaties or dealings and was acting completely within international law. Sauk never violated any consensus, but Fox did the moment it attacked -unannounced - the Sauk.

In this move we shall not waver, the Fox must be dealt with. For fifty years the Fox has plagued Sauk's borders, and now our righteous vengeance is at hand. 'Twould any other nation on this continent be assaulted by its inferior brothers, we would never for a moment deny that nation's right to defend itself and secure itself a better position of interest.

And as for you, Deseret, you are a disgrace. We gave you independence and railroads, technology and supplies, and ultimately your very freedom when you escaped intolerant Ohioans - and for what? So that you might turn around and slap us with the white glove when it best befit you? You should be ashamed of yourselves for defending uncivilized barbarous Fox savages. We have tamed the Sauk and made them like us, and the Fox rejected civilization. And yet you defend native savages! For shame, Deseret. For shame.

Finally, Mexico. Yours is a worry we can tend to best, because it is not without base unlike your hypocritical ally. Let us assure you that this move is made in the interests of security and nothing else. Would you prefer Fox stay as it is and continue mongering war with its neighbors, or would you prefer calm in the Indian nations for the first time in an age? The choice is an easy one, and we are sure you'll make the right decision.

As for the rest of the world, you have seen our reason, and it is a good one. We Frenchmen abhor war, despise war, loathe war, but we act when aggressive nations attack us. A secure world cannot be achieved unless the aggressor states are removed.
 
I am New France.

To Fox, you are faced with most of the French Protecorate, surrender know to Sauk and be civilized under them, If you don't agree we will send aid anyway possible to fight you.
 
To: Mexico, Virginia, Deseret, whom it may concern
From: The Imperium of France
Re: Sauk-Fox War


Such displays of hypocrisy we have not seen in an age. Virginia, you can halt your meaningless rhetoric this instant, as not two years ago you attacked and annexed a nation on very dubious charges. In this instance, Fox has attacked another sovereign nation, a sovereign nation which in no way violated any international treaties or dealings and was acting completely within international law. Sauk never violated any consensus, but Fox did the moment it attacked -unannounced - the Sauk.

In this move we shall not waver, the Fox must be dealt with. For fifty years the Fox has plagued Sauk's borders, and now our righteous vengeance is at hand. 'Twould any other nation on this continent be assaulted by its inferior brothers, we would never for a moment deny that nation's right to defend itself and secure itself a better position of interest.

And as for you, Deseret, you are a disgrace. We gave you independence and railroads, technology and supplies, and ultimately your very freedom when you escaped intolerant Ohioans - and for what? So that you might turn around and slap us with the white glove when it best befit you? You should be ashamed of yourselves for defending uncivilized barbarous Fox savages. We have tamed the Sauk and made them like us, and the Fox rejected civilization. And yet you defend native savages! For shame, Deseret. For shame.

Finally, Mexico. Yours is a worry we can tend to best, because it is not without base unlike your hypocritical ally. Let us assure you that this move is made in the interests of security and nothing else. Would you prefer Fox stay as it is and continue mongering war with its neighbors, or would you prefer calm in the Indian nations for the first time in an age? The choice is an easy one, and we are sure you'll make the right decision.

As for the rest of the world, you have seen our reason, and it is a good one. We Frenchmen abhor war, despise war, loathe war, but we act when aggressive nations attack us. A secure world cannot be achieved unless the aggressor states are removed.


To France
From New England

Just as you say you would stand up for any small, oppressed nation in North America, so to were the Fox trying to stand up for the oppressed Isanti under Sauk rule. These people are being slaughtered and you are aiding their tormentors and declaring war on the people trying to help them. We feel that a diplomatic solution MUST be reached, or else the plight of the Isanti people will be overlooked. Yes, what the Fox did was wrong, but their hearts were in the right place. For despite the fact that they are smaller and weaker than the Sauk, they chose to stand up for the rights of all peoples to freedom and liberty. Are not our two nations founded on such principles, that all men are free from oppression and death? By siding with the Sauk, you are standing beside tyrants and murderers. Shouldn't nations such as ours, those with power and influence, be the ones fighting such injustice and not leave it to smaller, weaker nations such as the Fox?
 
to: World
from: Louisiana
No foreign soldiers will be permitted passage up the Mississippi or through Louisianan territory to fight in the Sauk-Fox war.
 
To: Mexico, Virginia, Deseret, whom it may concern
From: The Imperium of France
Re: Sauk-Fox War


Such displays of hypocrisy we have not seen in an age. Virginia, you can halt your meaningless rhetoric this instant, as not two years ago you attacked and annexed a nation on very dubious charges. In this instance, Fox has attacked another sovereign nation, a sovereign nation which in no way violated any international treaties or dealings and was acting completely within international law. Sauk never violated any consensus, but Fox did the moment it attacked -unannounced - the Sauk.

In this move we shall not waver, the Fox must be dealt with. For fifty years the Fox has plagued Sauk's borders, and now our righteous vengeance is at hand. 'Twould any other nation on this continent be assaulted by its inferior brothers, we would never for a moment deny that nation's right to defend itself and secure itself a better position of interest.

And as for you, Deseret, you are a disgrace. We gave you independence and railroads, technology and supplies, and ultimately your very freedom when you escaped intolerant Ohioans - and for what? So that you might turn around and slap us with the white glove when it best befit you? You should be ashamed of yourselves for defending uncivilized barbarous Fox savages. We have tamed the Sauk and made them like us, and the Fox rejected civilization. And yet you defend native savages! For shame, Deseret. For shame.

Finally, Mexico. Yours is a worry we can tend to best, because it is not without base unlike your hypocritical ally. Let us assure you that this move is made in the interests of security and nothing else. Would you prefer Fox stay as it is and continue mongering war with its neighbors, or would you prefer calm in the Indian nations for the first time in an age? The choice is an easy one, and we are sure you'll make the right decision.

As for the rest of the world, you have seen our reason, and it is a good one. We Frenchmen abhor war, despise war, loathe war, but we act when aggressive nations attack us. A secure world cannot be achieved unless the aggressor states are removed.

To: France, All concerned
From: Mexico


The Mexican Government agrees that the Fox Republic should be punished for its aggressive actions however the Mexican Government fears the expansion of French and Sauk influence in North America will only lead to further conflict. Already nations such as Virginia, Tennessee and Deseret have expressed concerns about this and we feel that further action could lead to this war becoming something much larger than it currently is.

Mexico herself fears further French expansion in North America with Mexico having a direct border to New France, Louisiana recently declaring war against Texas for no reason and now Quebec and France on the verge of war we fear that in time we may become a target for the French Imperial Protectorate.

Mexico is unsure who France is calling our ally in this situation. Our concerns over this matter are our concerns alone. Mexico personally believes that the Indian North American nations are a threat to the peaceful and stable nations of North America and efforts should be made to ensure that their efforts to disrupt the more civilized nations of the region have a minimal effect at best.
 
To: Serbia
From: Bulgaria

We demand an apology for the aggression against our borders!

To: THose considered in the northern war
From: Fox Republic

We merely stand up for the rights of all people on the continent. The Sauk have been waging unending war against the true peoples of North America, and we determined to take steps to protect ourselves against the inevitable onslaught. Furthermore, their mobilization and military response was surprisingly well planned. We will fight to the end to preserve the freedoms of people who stand up against imperialism in the Americas.
 
To: Mexico
From: France


Many of those arguments are now moot, given the aggression of Virginia. If Sauk is to be forbidden from exacting revenge, then Virginia must give Miami complete and total independence. That is the only way we will back down.

To: New England
From: France


You speak truth with regards to us of the Entente and et cetera standing up for rights, and against tyranny - indeed, France is the vanguard of constitutionalism and republicanism in west Europe. However, there is no conclusive evidence except that which is presented by biased anti-French papers on any "atrocities" committed by the Sauk. Furthermore, such atrocities, were they even existent, may have been taken out of context: what if these Isanti - which we know to be violent and subversive - were engaged in anarchistic terrorism against Sauk? Since we do not know all the facts surrounding this so called "Isanti tragedy," we cannot possibly judge Sauk. Rather, all that we can judge is that which speaks for itself, and that is Fox's uncalled for, sudden, and cowardly invasion of Sauk.
 
Official Sauk response to the warmongering leaders of the Fox Republic

We are not stupid, we saw that it was you whom armed the Isanti and made them fight our forces, you hoped that they would weaken us and pave the way for your sneak invasion, but you underestimated the resolve of the Sauk and as our brave soldiers held their lines against overwhelming odds our peoples rallied behind our righteous leaders and rebuked your forces assault on our lands.

Needless to say, our generals then took the initiative and pursued your forces across the border, relentlessly engaging them each time they tried to make a stand and driving your warmongering regime in a corner.

We Sauk are a peace loving people, but when attacked we will not rest until those that attacked us have been rendered harmless. If you care in any way about your subjects you will spare them the hardship of a prolonged war and surrender unconditionally. If you do, your soldiers will not be prosecuted for your crimes and even you may be shown clemency.
 
To: New England
From: France


You speak truth with regards to us of the Entente and et cetera standing up for rights, and against tyranny - indeed, France is the vanguard of constitutionalism and republicanism in west Europe. However, there is no conclusive evidence except that which is presented by biased anti-French papers on any "atrocities" committed by the Sauk. Furthermore, such atrocities, were they even existent, may have been taken out of context: what if these Isanti - which we know to be violent and subversive - were engaged in anarchistic terrorism against Sauk? Since we do not know all the facts surrounding this so called "Isanti tragedy," we cannot possibly judge Sauk. Rather, all that we can judge is that which speaks for itself, and that is Fox's uncalled for, sudden, and cowardly invasion of Sauk.

How is attacking a country with a larger military and twice your size cowardly?
 
To: Bulgaria
From: Serbia

Not until the investigation is done.

To: Russia
From: Serbia

Would you run your own investigation?
 
OCC: My bad, checked but didn't see the update for that.
 
OOC: The war ended already. It was in the update...
 
To: Mexico, Virginia, Deseret, whom it may concern
From: The Imperium of France
Re: Sauk-Fox War


Such displays of hypocrisy we have not seen in an age. Virginia, you can halt your meaningless rhetoric this instant, as not two years ago you attacked and annexed a nation on very dubious charges. In this instance, Fox has attacked another sovereign nation, a sovereign nation which in no way violated any international treaties or dealings and was acting completely within international law. Sauk never violated any consensus, but Fox did the moment it attacked -unannounced - the Sauk.

In this move we shall not waver, the Fox must be dealt with. For fifty years the Fox has plagued Sauk's borders, and now our righteous vengeance is at hand. 'Twould any other nation on this continent be assaulted by its inferior brothers, we would never for a moment deny that nation's right to defend itself and secure itself a better position of interest.

And as for you, Deseret, you are a disgrace. We gave you independence and railroads, technology and supplies, and ultimately your very freedom when you escaped intolerant Ohioans - and for what? So that you might turn around and slap us with the white glove when it best befit you? You should be ashamed of yourselves for defending uncivilized barbarous Fox savages. We have tamed the Sauk and made them like us, and the Fox rejected civilization. And yet you defend native savages! For shame, Deseret. For shame.

Finally, Mexico. Yours is a worry we can tend to best, because it is not without base unlike your hypocritical ally. Let us assure you that this move is made in the interests of security and nothing else. Would you prefer Fox stay as it is and continue mongering war with its neighbors, or would you prefer calm in the Indian nations for the first time in an age? The choice is an easy one, and we are sure you'll make the right decision.

As for the rest of the world, you have seen our reason, and it is a good one. We Frenchmen abhor war, despise war, loathe war, but we act when aggressive nations attack us. A secure world cannot be achieved unless the aggressor states are removed.


Virginia has only in the past seeked to secure our borders and provide for our own defense. There is no hypocrisy here, we are not chastising the Sauk for protecting its own interests, except that it destabilizes our own border. If I remember correctly, it was the French who also felt this way in the Cumberland War, when Virginia was warring on Louisiana's border. And the French speak of Virginian hypocrisy?

We do not meddle in European affairs, so we kindly ask the French not to meddle in American affairs. This war is an American affair, and we are handling in a much more civilized way then many Europeans would.
 
To France
From Deseret


While we are appreciative of your assistance in granting us our current stage in the World. Deseret must begin to create a government that is free from European influence, to avoid the bloody history of your continent. As is evident from your protectorates to our north. That said, we still consider France a great nation when it comes to protecting the world that it has a direct or indirect control over. But like Virginia, American matters should be now resolved solely in America without foreign assistance.

Deseret is founded on the word of our Lord, and we do not tolerate bloodshed as He does. But make no mistake, if necessary Deseret will go to war to protect her interests. And if that means declaring war on Sauk, then so be it. But again we say that a peaceful resolution can be found, punish Fox by demanding reparations instead of fully annexing them. We still invite all delegates to come and iron out the details if they are gentlemen enough.
 
To: Deseret, Virginia
From: France


Both of you are guilty of fatal errors of judgment, however: France is as every bit an American nation as a European one. We happen to be the guardians of nations in America, and we have peopled much land in America. We must act as such, and that means retaliating against aggression. As for the Cumberland War, Virginia, ultimately we allowed you the luxury of annexing that state for your own security. For a nation which is forged out of blood and conquest, you are one to talk about rash, "uncivilized" acts.
 
To: Bulgaria
From: Serbia

I will not apologize until the culprits are brought to me.

Believe me, we shall reprimand this commander.
 
To: Deseret, Virginia
From: France


Both of you are guilty of fatal errors of judgment, however: France is as every bit an American nation as a European one. We happen to be the guardians of nations in America, and we have peopled much land in America. We must act as such, and that means retaliating against aggression. As for the Cumberland War, Virginia, ultimately we allowed you the luxury of annexing that state for your own security. For a nation which is forged out of blood and conquest, you are one to talk about rash, "uncivilized" acts.

To France
From New England

And what makes France the Guardian of America? The nations of the Americas were founded by the English, Spanish, Russians and Portuguese, as well as France, as well as the Native Americans who were here long before any European set foot on this continent and remain here today. If France is the Guardian of the Americas, why does France let the slaughtering of the Isanti continue, with no signs of aid forthcoming? Why did France allow Louisiana, their protectorate, to do the exact same thing that you are now accusing the Fox of doing, with only a slap on the wrist in response? Why have you allowed Quebec to rashly expand westward, massacring any and all Natives who stand in their way? Kindly leave the guarding of the Americas to those who can best deal with it: Americans.
 
faint cries of 'Hear Hear' can be heard drifting across the atlantic
 
Back
Top Bottom