Mirc
Not mIRC!!!
After spending some great time in a cheap hostel in Belgrade, seeing lots of foreigners and understand how you will always pretty much only meet people with an adventurous spirit in such places, people with whom you have what to talk about, see fantastic stuff, have a lot of fun and getting together with 5 different girls in 5 different nights in a row (from which I don't even know the names of two), and after having just bought some great equipment this summer, and knowing how much I love traveling, I decided I want to go backpacking through Europe REALLY REALLY badly.
Right now, I am pretty far from having even 1/8 of the money I would need for something like this, but I am thinking about it, and if I already have a plan I'm sure I could manage something until the next summer.
I want to go through this part of Europe, see the obscure but beautiful stuff (like I just have been doing in Serbia in the past week), but I'm not sure which route to choose.
One of the problems is that money is limiting me. My plan includes quite a loooooooooooong trip, like 40 days or so. I'm not really sure how much I could spend in each of those places (I don't want to be always in a hurry) but I would absolutely love doing something like this, and make unequal stops - like 1 day here, 5 days here, etc.
Knowing a fair bit about this part of Europe, I made a couple of plans. The most important part of the plan however is that I don't plan to respect the plan. But I'm completely confident that I absolutely need some kind of skeleton to build on.
So basically I have to choose between those hypothetical routes:
1) The longest one would probably be incredibly hard to manage, but if many people suggest this, I will definitely give it a thought. This would be Bucharest - Sibiu - Budapest - Bratislava - Vienna - Zagreb - Split - Sofia - Thesalloniki - Athens - Crete (Heraklion) - Antalya - Istanbul - Bucharest. Having 12 stops though, and wanting to be able to stay more than 1 day in each place (I'd like an average or 4-5 days or so), I don't know if I can make it in around 40-42 days.
2) Another one I could do is Bucharest - Sibiu - Budapest - Vienna - Split - Sofia - Thessaloniki - Athens - Crete (Heraklion) - Istanbul - Bucharest. This one has only nine steps, however I'm missing quite a few important places: Bratislava, Zagreb, Antalya.
3) I would really love to go in southern Turkey though. So another one is just like the one above, plus Antalya. Bucharest - Sibiu - Budapest - Vienna - Split - Sofia - Thessaloniki - Athens - Crete (Heraklion) - Antalya - Istanbul - Bucharest.
4) Route number 4 would be... the open one? I mean the one with the suggestions about which places from the first one I could be skipping, and which important ones I forgot about. I really want to stop for a few days in Sibiu, in Romania, though it doesn't seem so important, because I've never been there for more than 2 hours and I think it's a fantastic place. I also am more eager to see Split and the Dalmatian coast rather than Zagreb, though I'd like Zagreb too... Thessaloniki could be another one I could skip. Is Bratislava interesting enough to be worth staying a few days? Or at least a 1 day detour? Don't really know.
I would absolutely love the idea of going to such a trip, with only my backpack and my guitar tied to it... But it's so hard to make up my mind!! So what would you suggest?
As for my opinion, I'm kind of inclining towards the 3rd one, but I don't really know...
Right now, I am pretty far from having even 1/8 of the money I would need for something like this, but I am thinking about it, and if I already have a plan I'm sure I could manage something until the next summer.
I want to go through this part of Europe, see the obscure but beautiful stuff (like I just have been doing in Serbia in the past week), but I'm not sure which route to choose.
One of the problems is that money is limiting me. My plan includes quite a loooooooooooong trip, like 40 days or so. I'm not really sure how much I could spend in each of those places (I don't want to be always in a hurry) but I would absolutely love doing something like this, and make unequal stops - like 1 day here, 5 days here, etc.
Knowing a fair bit about this part of Europe, I made a couple of plans. The most important part of the plan however is that I don't plan to respect the plan. But I'm completely confident that I absolutely need some kind of skeleton to build on.
So basically I have to choose between those hypothetical routes:
1) The longest one would probably be incredibly hard to manage, but if many people suggest this, I will definitely give it a thought. This would be Bucharest - Sibiu - Budapest - Bratislava - Vienna - Zagreb - Split - Sofia - Thesalloniki - Athens - Crete (Heraklion) - Antalya - Istanbul - Bucharest. Having 12 stops though, and wanting to be able to stay more than 1 day in each place (I'd like an average or 4-5 days or so), I don't know if I can make it in around 40-42 days.
2) Another one I could do is Bucharest - Sibiu - Budapest - Vienna - Split - Sofia - Thessaloniki - Athens - Crete (Heraklion) - Istanbul - Bucharest. This one has only nine steps, however I'm missing quite a few important places: Bratislava, Zagreb, Antalya.
3) I would really love to go in southern Turkey though. So another one is just like the one above, plus Antalya. Bucharest - Sibiu - Budapest - Vienna - Split - Sofia - Thessaloniki - Athens - Crete (Heraklion) - Antalya - Istanbul - Bucharest.
4) Route number 4 would be... the open one? I mean the one with the suggestions about which places from the first one I could be skipping, and which important ones I forgot about. I really want to stop for a few days in Sibiu, in Romania, though it doesn't seem so important, because I've never been there for more than 2 hours and I think it's a fantastic place. I also am more eager to see Split and the Dalmatian coast rather than Zagreb, though I'd like Zagreb too... Thessaloniki could be another one I could skip. Is Bratislava interesting enough to be worth staying a few days? Or at least a 1 day detour? Don't really know.
I would absolutely love the idea of going to such a trip, with only my backpack and my guitar tied to it... But it's so hard to make up my mind!! So what would you suggest?
As for my opinion, I'm kind of inclining towards the 3rd one, but I don't really know...