Aaron russo on the 9-11 inside job

Status
Not open for further replies.
And again, neither the new owners, nor the old owners, were the US government or the CIA.....so what reason would the US government or the CIA become involved in conspiring to destroy the WTC in order to cover up an health/environmental issue there?

Also, for what it is worth, contrary to what you said, the WTC did not change owners shortly before the attacks.

The World Trade Center has been owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey since the day they first began construction on it in August 1968. It is to this day still owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. It has always been owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
O.K. I had it bit wrong. Check out this:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein
Anyway you seem to (perhaps unintetionaly) be twisting what I was saying. I never said there was any need for any health issue cover up. It was an open information.
 
I think if we are to seriously entertain posibility of such events we cant connect it with the actual government but with the people behind it who never get elected or hired for official positions but never the less are in position to control the decisions.

So in order to "seriously entertain posibility of such events" we need to suspend our judgement and believe that some sort of shadowy organization lurking in the background controls the world?
 
You need to suspend your belief only. Judgment should tell you that US is democracy only in name for long time now.
 
So in order to "seriously entertain posibility of such events" we need to suspend our judgement and believe that some sort of shadowy organization lurking in the background controls the world?

As one of your lizard overlords I can confirm that this is true.

Spoiler :
Our leader Ronald McDonald has implanted microscopic mind control devices in your brain that will wipe all knowledge of this post when you leave this tread.

PS the tin foil does not work.;)
 
O.K. I had it bit wrong. Check out this:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein
Anyway you seem to (perhaps unintetionaly) be twisting what I was saying. I never said there was any need for any health issue cover up. It was an open information.

OK, my mistake if I conflated the two.

You did however say (in your reply post #106 to Gary Childress) that:
"There seem to be several reasons for it. The buildings have had some serious health issue becouse of the material which was used to build it with and very expensive reconstruction was required".

In your post #102 you said that the hijackers were on the CIA payroll.

That Larry Silverstein had leased the WTC from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and that Mr. Silverstein may or may not have had some health issues involved with those properties...does that somehow involve the CIA? Did Silverstein orchestrate the CIA to put hijackers on its payroll to hijack and fly planes into the WTC to somehow resolve the environmental/health issues at the WTC? Or is there no connection at all between the two?
 
There is only one answer to all of these questions:

Spoiler :
Haliburton.
 
Wait, are we all still seriously debating the merits of the ridiculous conspiracy theory (read: nutjob fantasy) that 9/11 was an inside job? I thought CFC had a more sensible member base than this. :shake:
 
Wait, are we all still seriously debating the merits of the ridiculous conspiracy theory (read: nutjob fantasy) that 9/11 was an inside job? I thought CFC OT had a more sensible member base than this. :shake:

Don't lump us all in.

Also, even in this case, it's a brutal lie. Sorry. OT's just beyond rescue.
 
Wait, are we all still seriously debating the merits of the ridiculous conspiracy theory (read: nutjob fantasy) that 9/11 was an inside job? I thought CFC had a more sensible member base than this. :shake:

Think of the internet as a giant endless game of whack-a-mole...
 
Wait, are we all still seriously debating the merits of the ridiculous conspiracy theory (read: nutjob fantasy) that 9/11 was an inside job? I thought CFC had a more sensible member base than this.

Yeah good thing there are so many PhD historian-know-it-alls chiming in to keep the Proles from bucking the Inner Party. NOT! Now this folks-

Putin: Russia Is Ready To Show Proof That 9/11 Was An Inside Job
http://yournewswire.com/putin-russia-is-ready-to-show-proof-that-911-was-an-inside-job/
 
How much is the Kremlin payrate for shills these days? Hopefully at least higher than the Chinese; it's depressing how they pay so few for so much work.
 
How much is the Kremlin payrate for shills these days?

I wouldnt know since I support President Putin financially. God Bless him.
 
:goodjob:
 
So my questions are:

1. Who is presumably responsible for all this? George Bush? Dick Cheney?

Some call these people "global mafia". Lets hear what Bush has to say about this:

Link to video.

2. Why would they want to destroy the WTC and kill some 2,000 to 3,000 Americans so that they can invade Iraq for whatever reason?
Seeing it from the pov of "global mafia" destruction of WTC has paid off and killing an Americans means probably as much as killing people in Iraq or elswhere. There is no patriotism involved...

3. Has anyone come forward with any confession of being part of or even knowing of such a plot?
I have only an indicia for this and I think I will be on look out for answwers to this.

4. How would the government cover something like that up and keep it from going public? They can't even keep their own mouths shut when it comes to blowing the cover of their own CIA agents.
The thing about mafia is that it works like a family. 'No dirty rags are being washed in public.' Apparently large network of loyal or corrupted personel with various degree of awarness is necessary.

5. I can certainly see how Islamic fundamentalists might want to kill 2,000 Americans but who in the US government would agree to such a conspiracy when they were presented it? I presume at some point Bush or Cheney or whoever responsible must have asked someone else to help them and those people said, "sure, why not? we don't mind killing 2,000 of our fellow Americans."
I can imagine some fundamentalist shooting a gun or making up a primitive bombs but not flying a large planes into the buildings - they didnt have required skills for that.
Country, nationality or some other way of identification with some other people or cause are all concepts. I presume that whoever doesnt mind killing thousands of Americans doesnt feel loyal the way most of ordinary people would expect him to and tghe way you anticipate. These people must have something else which put highly above whats called patriotism.

Again, I know nothing about engineering or the NIST report. But just knowing a little of human nature I really find it difficult to believe that any US official could engineer such a plot without someone leaking it to the press. Heck, knowing Government officials we'd be reading about it in someone's official memoirs by now.
This seems to be intuitively correct. However we have at least testimony of people who protested how the NIST investigation was carried out and who were fired from the project.
 
I can imagine some fundamentalist shooting a gun or making up a primitive bombs but not flying a large planes into the buildings - they didnt have required skills for that.

I suppose fundamentalists get a lobotomy when they join up.
No danger there them.:goodjob:
 
Bizare that bald-faced liars get away with murder in the US repeatedly-

"But nobody could have predicted people would take an airplane and slam it into the WTC, take another and slam it into the Pentagon..."

Link to video.

Also the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, not a commercial airliner-
5dbc426c4403.gif



Link to video.


Link to video.

Follw the money-

Link to video.

:king:

PS- why isnt the vido link working properly?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom