Moderator Action: Please, no moralizing in this thread. When it comes to how people choose to play the game (including achievement hunting), to each his own.
Anybody managed to finish “Gifts of the Nile” on Deity?
You're welcome. It took a lot of patience forcing the 2 civs into a tight sliver of the earth. Luckily Germany was far more advanced than Egypt and the Egyptian capital was reconquered several times before I met the conditions of a liberation war. I was the puppet masterHoly moly! Thank you for this one! I had been struggling even to get Egypt being declared war by another civ.
I don't think there is a moral issue here...but I am completely baffled as to what the point of collecting achievements this way is. The way I see it, the purpose of achievements is to commemorate/record things you have done, or to provide extra goals for the game, perhaps encouraging you to explore more of the content than you otherwise would have. Achievements give no other benefits as far as I am aware. When you unlock them this way, or more perhaps more efficiently with a mod, aren't you for all practical purposes just disabling achievements, as they no longer track what you have done?Without saying this entire thread is completely immoral and you lot are all going straight to the seventh level of hell....![]()
![]()
![]()
lol...
I couldn't claim an achievement that I hadn't done myself![]()
Thanks!Here are "Sea of the Bow" and "From Med to Red to the Land of the Dead". Just settle/attack the city-state.
"You’re the Demonstrably Greatest" is still the only one I couldn't get.