Ahmadinejad Proud of Holocaust Denial

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure why people care whether or not he believes it happened. There are many states that still refuse to acknowledge the Armenian genocide (including ironically Israel), but that receives a fraction of the uproar and I presume it's for the same reason: it's in their best interest not to, whether it's not to pi$$ off an ally or strengthens the argument of their cause.
 
I think a nation that has managed to survive, thrive, and build up one of the strongest armies in the world, in spite of being surrounded by enemies in the middle of a dessert is pretty awesome. Add to that surviving in the face of the opposition of most of Europe and constant terrorist attacks and you'd be hard pressed to find a cooler nation.

theres a reason they face constant terrorist threats and opposition from europe, they suck.
 
Plus you can visit Auschwitz...

Replicas. The orginal buildings poor construction meant that they didnt last very long they had to be rebuilt.

Ironicly a stupid holocaust denier whom visited the site didnt know this and used as "evidence" the construction of the buildings could not have been used to kill jews because the gas chamber doors didnt seal properly. Went to court and got destroyed.
 
theres a reason they face constant terrorist threats and opposition from europe, they suck.

I have to wonder, are you an actual Nazi as the Stormfront link would suggest, or are you just trolling as this non-point would suggest? If the latter, I suggest something other than Neo-Nazi trolling might be just as fun and less disgusting.
 
I have to wonder, are you an actual Nazi as the Stormfront link would suggest, or are you just trolling as this non-point would suggest? If the latter, I suggest something other than Neo-Nazi trolling might be just as fun and less disgusting.

the only thing thats disgusting is yo face.
 
I have to wonder, are you an actual Nazi as the Stormfront link would suggest, or are you just trolling as this non-point would suggest? If the latter, I suggest something other than Neo-Nazi trolling might be just as fun and less disgusting.

Its hossam, don't worry ;)
 
Elie+Wiesel+Buchenwald+Concentration+Camp+Holocaust+Survivor.jpg
auschwitz1.jpg
Bodies.jpg
Those people aren't gassed to death. The allies cut the food supply which meant that hundreds of thousans if not millions starved to death. I think most countries would feed their army and their own population before feeding prisnors. These people where killed by the allies.

Is this list enough, or do I have to find all the 6 million names and post them with photos and their individual history?
Intresting. These are people that disapeared in the concentration camps. How do we know they didn't starve to death do to allied blockades? How do we know they weren't killed by the Soviets?

O dear. Do you realise that that document that you linked to denies the holocaust! They talk about creating a jewish state. They were zionists! Where in this document does it say gas them. Sending this to Iran will convince the president he is right. You will have to send him something else.
If you want more, check the documents on this page.

This site has serious problems with its sources. Take the stangl. He was interviewed many years later by an author who made no audiotapes of the interview and stagnl was never given a chance to comment on the interview. Basically this is what a mainstrem historian claims he said.

Yitzhak Arad, I think you need to find a guy with a straighter story. Yitzhak Arad is not a very good witness. You need someone with fewer logical errors.

I've been to the Anne Frank House. It's very powerful (it's a completely empty house with a small museum in the hiding place).

Everyone should pay it a visit at some point.
I have been there. Wasn't that much to see.

Any way I think Mr president will have two questions.

1) Why was her father put in a hospital in auschwitz was a death camp?

2) How do we know she was gassed? We need evidence of how she died. Prove that gassing caused her death.

Also we still need atleast one peice of hard evidence so that we can prove to him that it happend.
 
The trouble with religious people is that no matter how much evidence refuting their beliefs you give them, no matter how good is your reasoning, no matter how irrefutable are the facts...

... they will ignore all that and continue believing in their particular brand of delusion.

On record: I'd love to send you and others like your to a 2-year special summer camp in Dachau. You'd lose some weight and get a grip.
 
The trouble with religious people is that no matter how much evidence refuting their beliefs you give them, no matter how good is your reasoning, no matter how irrefutable are the facts...

... they will ignore all that and continue believing in their particular brand of delusion.

On record: I'd love to send you and others like your to a 2-year special summer camp in Dachau. You'd lose some weight and get a grip.

i don't deny the holocaust. I just want a lot more evidence. Please provide.

Preferably hard evidence.
 
i don't deny the holocaust. I just want a lot more evidence. Please provide.

Preferably hard evidence.

Auschwitz is still standing and open to public. So pack up, buy a ticket into the land of Polish untermenschen and visit the place. It's full of hard evidence.
 
In Hitler's book "Mein Kampf" (or even just the summary of it) he writes about destroying all Jews and enslaving all non-Germans, that was his goal with the world (besides controlling all of it).
So don't forget that not only he wanted to exterminate all Jews, he WROTE about it and the stages of how Germany should prepare for the extermination, how they should find each and every Jew.
This together with the disappearance of 6 million Jews from Europe, plus all proof, even if it's not as some of you say "definite hard proof", since I don't think Holocaust deniers will ever accept that there is hard proof, should be enough to convince most logical people who are, say, "neutral" about this (not deniers and not those who accept it with no proof whatsoever).
 
why are you guys bothering to convince AL and Ahmad about the existence of the Shoa?
If I say WWI never happened, will post pictures about of Verdun?
Shoah deniers aren't rational people, it is not about evidence, it is political. I don't understand all the fuss about it honestly. If some nuts wants to believe that Bismark never existed or that Elvis is still alive, well he is just a nuts. Ahmad is doing it for political reasons, it is not about History.
 
Auschwitz is still standing and open to public. So pack up, buy a ticket into the land of Polish untermenschen and visit the place. It's full of hard evidence.

Replicas. The orginal buildings poor construction meant that they didnt last very long they had to be rebuilt.

Ironicly a stupid holocaust denier whom visited the site didnt know this and used as "evidence" the construction of the buildings could not have been used to kill jews because the gas chamber doors didnt seal properly. Went to court and got destroyed.
Which way are you guys going to have it?

I don't think Ahmadinejad denies the existance of the camp, I don't think anyone does. Is their anything in the camp that proves industrial murder?

In Hitler's book "Mein Kampf" (or even just the summary of it) he writes about destroying all Jews and enslaving all non-Germans, that was his goal with the world (besides controlling all of it).
So don't forget that not only he wanted to exterminate all Jews, he WROTE about it and the stages of how Germany should prepare for the extermination, how they should find each and every Jew.
This together with the disappearance of 6 million Jews from Europe, plus all proof, even if it's not as some of you say "definite hard proof", since I don't think Holocaust deniers will ever accept that there is hard proof, should be enough to convince most logical people who are, say, "neutral" about this (not deniers and not those who accept it with no proof whatsoever).
Note that he talked about setting up a jewish state in madagascar. He never said gas them all. 3000 tonnes of documents where found after the war. Not one document ordering a mass execution has been found. None about buying zyklon b, none about gas chambers, none about the entire industrial process. However 25 000 documents have been found about creating a jewish state. Where does it say in mein kampf that they planned to kill every jew?

If 6 million jews disappeared in wwII where did the jews in Israel come from.

The number 6 million is mythylogical.
tashuvu1.gif

Rabbi Harav Yitzchak Ginsburgh explains: Since the world was created through God's 'speech', each letter represents a different creative force.

Certain letters, and the corresponding numerical value, are considered in Judaism to have greater mystical power than others because of the frequency with which they are found in 'Torah'. One such value, the expression of which holds a predominant power in the Jewish psyche, is the Hebrew letter 'vav' which has a numerical value of six. As well as its obvious relationship to the six days of creation and the Jewish sabbath Rabbi Harav Yitzchak Ginsburgh reveals much of its esoteric connotation in his book The Alef-Beit: Jewish Thought Revealed Through the Hebrew Letters. For example, one learns that: "the consummate structure of six (as in the form of the Magen David [Star of David], the outer area of whose six 'wings' equals, and therefore folds onto, the area of its inner hexagon), reflected by the six orders of the Mishnah, finds its source in the dimensions of the Tablets given to Moses at Sinai. They were cubes measuring six handbreadths in each direction." A cube has six faces, of course.
There has been talk of 6 million jews for 109 years.

The 6 million died in WWII comes from a readers digest article published in 1943 (before the holocaust took place) by a jewish script writer named Ben Hecht.
why are you guys bothering to convince AL and Ahmad about the existence of the Shoa?
If I say WWI never happened, will post pictures about of Verdun?
Shoah deniers aren't rational people, it is not about evidence, it is political. I don't understand all the fuss about it honestly. If some nuts wants to believe that Bismark never existed or that Elvis is still alive, well he is just a nuts. Ahmad is doing it for political reasons, it is not about History.
I could easily find physical evidence for WWI. Please physical evidence for the holocaust.
 
I have no problem with people questioning the details, exact numbers and exact circumstances of the Holocaust, one is not a holocaust denier if one thinks that less than 6m Jews died in it, assuming there is some reason to think this.

However, anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can tell the difference between someone who has a legitimate interest in finding if figures and details of it could be historically inaccurate, and scumbags who are trying to deny it happened, or excuse it, and just aren't brave enough to come out and say it.

Someone should stright-out ask Ahmedinejhad whether he believes that the Germans undertook a genocide against the Jews in WW2. If he maintains they did, but want to quibble about numbers, etc, then thats legit. If he tries to claim it didnt happen, its not legit.
 
I could easily find physical evidence for WWI. Please physical evidence for the holocaust.

See, your logic here is so ludicrous, that its quite apparent we could build a time machine, bring you back to Auschwitz in 1944, run you through the camps, show you the gas chambers and make you inhale the smoke coming out of the stacks and you would still claim it didnt happen. Like Winner said, when something has been proven again and again, and someone still won't believe it, then the person who keeps trying to convince them is as big a fool as the denier.
 
I have no problem with people questioning the details, exact numbers and exact circumstances of the Holocaust, one is not a holocaust denier if one thinks that less than 6m Jews died in it, assuming there is some reason to think this.

However, anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can tell the difference between someone who has a legitimate interest in finding if figures and details of it could be historically inaccurate, and scumbags who are trying to deny it happened, or excuse it, and just aren't brave enough to come out and say it.

Someone should stright-out ask Ahmedinejhad whether he believes that the Germans undertook a genocide against the Jews in WW2. If he maintains they did, but want to quibble about numbers, etc, then thats legit. If he tries to claim it didnt happen, its not legit.
Innocent until proven guilty. The holocaust has not happend until it is one hundred percent proven. So lets find some physical evidence.
 
Why would somebody who denies the holocaust not be proud of it?

"Well, you see sir, I just can't help but deny the holocaust. I'm awfully sorry about it, but for me the facts just don't add up."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom