Al Queda has Nuclear weapons?

zulu9812

The Newbie Nightmare
Joined
Jan 29, 2002
Messages
6,388
Location
Athens of the North
from http://www.ostara.org/e-books/ww3c_e.htm

If this is a factual and true statement from an Al Queda official then the destruction of America and Israel is only a matter of short time, maybe Months, maybe Years. This report was publishes by the network final conflict nr. Fc2118.

The following interview was conducted by a reporter for the Al-Jazeera network with the third-in-command of the Al Queda organization, Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf. Al-Asuquf's background is impressive; a doctorate in physics and masters in international economics. In the interview, he talks of Al Queda's plans with total detachment, with deep knowledge and an

unshakeable commitment to his cause. This interview was sent to Abel-Bari Atwan, chief editor of Al Quds, an Arabic-language newspaper published in London, but was never printed, due to its highly revealing [inflammatory?] contents.

A copy of the interview came to Foz-do-Iguacu, and was translated into Portuguese by a university professor in the city's Arab community. This is probably the only existing version of this interview not in Arabic.

Al-Jazeera: What is the objective of the Al Queda network?

Al-Asuquf: To destroy the Great Satan, that is, the United States and Israel.

Al-Jazeera: Why?

Al-Asuquf: The USA over the past 60 years has been impregnating [infecting] the world with its arrogance, greed and malfeasance. It is the incarnation of all that is evil. The people of this planet don't deserve this torture.

Al-Jazeera: Isn't this view somewhat one-sided?

Al-Asuquf: No; one only has to observe recent events. The disrespect of the Kyoto treaty; the case of the Permanent Court of International Justice, their inaction with regards to our Palestinian brothers; the financial greed and absurd speculations in Third World countries; the complete indifference to other oppressed people and countless other situations which all of the world's leaders well know. And on top of all that, the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask questions later." This is an unacceptable abuse and will therefore have very grave consequences.

Al-Jazeera: But the isn't the development and influence of America the fruit of its own competence?

Al-Asuquf: Competence in extortion, competence in subjugation, competence in lying. After the Second World War, the USA was the only industrialized country with its manufacturing infrastructure intact. Loaning money like a good loan shark, it ended up becoming a very rich and powerful country; however, its greed remained undiminished. Today, Americans live like Maharajas [King], wasting more than any other people, spending more than $480 billion per year just on gambling. They've lost any notion of spiritualityand live in constant sin. With each passing day the USA demonstrates that it doesn't know how to live with other peoples; for this, it deserves destruction.

Al-Jazeera: Wouldn't it be easier to simply assassinate President George Bush?

Al-Asuquf: In the first place, it would do no good, other than turning him into a martyr. When you face a powerful enemy, the best strategy is not to kill him, but to make him lose his leadership due to his incompetence, and let him live to watch this unfold.

Al-Jazeera: Does the Al Queda network have the military capacity to make war on the United States?

Al-Asuquf: If we analyze history, we will see that all great wars, before they were started, were based on previously established concepts [of war]. But if we observe well, we will see that these concepts and strategies came to nothing, since a new type of war was ultimately waged. An example is The construction of the Maginot line by the French before the First World War, which, in reality proved to be completely useless against the invading forces. Aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines, and spy satellites will be useless in the next war.

Al-Jazeera: American authorities hold more than 1,000 people suspected of terrorism since September 11th. Won't this compromise Al Queda's plans?

Al-Asuquf: Of those imprisoned, perhaps 20 to 30 percent belong to Al Queda. Moreover, they are from the second echelon. We have more than 500 members of the first echelon and 800 from the second, inside the United States.

Al-Jazeera: What do you mean by first and second echelons?

Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon are Al Queda members who have been in the United States for more than 10 years, many married with children. They have detailed knowledge of our plans and are just waiting for a phone call. They are also known as "sleepers." Those of the second echelon have arrived in the last five years and have no idea of our plans.

Al-Jazeera: Are even those who are married, with children, ready to die with their families?

Al-Asuquf: Yes. All of them are ready to die. Long live September 11th.

Al-Jazeera: What was September 11th to Al Queda's overall plans?

Al-Asuquf: As a general step, it was just the beginning. It was a way of calling the world's attention to what is still to come.

Al-Jazeera: How many members does Al Queda have?

Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon, about 5,000; in the second, about 20,000, all over the world.

Al-Jazeera: In the detention camp at Guantanamo, are there any members of the first echelon?

Al-Asuquf: No, in fact, many of those there are not even Al Queda members.

Al-Jazeera: How does Al Queda intend to destroy the most powerful nation in history?

Al-Asuquf: It's a question of logistics. Using its own poison, that is, attacking the heart of what they consider the most important thing in the world: money.

Al-Jazeera: How so?

Al-Asuquf: The American economy is an economy of false appearances. There is no real economic ballast to the American economy. The American GDP of is something around $410 trillion, of which just 1 percent represents agriculture, and just 24 percent represents industry. Therefore, 75 percent of the American GDP is service and most of this is financial speculation. For those who understand economics, and it appears that the American Secretary of the Treasury, Paul O'Neil, doesn't or doesn't see it, it's enough to say that the USA acts like a huge "dot-com," and dollars, strictly speaking, are its shares.

Al-Jazeera: Can you explain that?

Al-Asuquf: The value of a company's shares is directly proportional to the profitability of the enterprise. When a business is just a service provider and doesn't produce any durable goods, the value of its shares depends on its credibility. Which is to say that if the credibility of the USA were shaken, its shares (the dollar) would fall with incredible rapidity and the entire American economy would begin to collapse.

Al-Jazeera: How can you be so sure of this?

Al-Asuquf: On a smaller scale, it's exactly what large financial groups do to the countries of the third world to reap profits in one month that Swiss banks couldn't get in four or five years.

Al-Jazeera: So how will Al Queda shock the American economy to this point?

Al-Asuquf: By provoking a deficit of between $450 and $470 trillion dollars, the equivalent of the United States' GDP for five to seven years.

Al-Jazeera: How will this be done?

Al-Asuquf: With the destruction of the seven largest American cities, along with other measures.

Al-Jazeera: By what means will this be done?

Al-Asuquf: Using atomic bombs.

Al-Jazeera: With all of the security in the USA, how, hypothetically, will these bombs be smuggled onto American soil?

Al-Asuquf: They won't be smuggled in, they're already there.

Al-Jazeera: What are you saying?

Al-Asuquf: There are already seven nuclear devices on American soil which were put in place before September 11th and are ready to be detonated.
 
continued

Al-Jazeera: How did they get in to the USA?

Al-Asuquf: Before September 11, American security was a fiasco, and even after, were it necessary, we could manage to smuggle bombs into the United States. They entered through seaports, as normal cargo.

Al-Jazeera: How is that possible?

Al-Asuquf: A nuclear device is no bigger than a refrigerator; therefore, it can be easily camouflaged as one. Millions of cargo containers arrive in seaports each day, and no matter how efficient security is, it's impossible to check, search through and examine each container.

Al-Jazeera: Where did these atomic bombs come from?

Al-Asuquf: They were purchased on the black market.

Al-Jazeera: From whom?

Al-Asuquf: We bought five from the defunct Soviet Union and two smaller ones from Pakistan.

Al-Jazeera: How is it possible to buy an atomic bomb? Isn't there security?

Al-Asuquf: Before 1989 it was practically impossible, however after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Russian army began a process of self destruction, and some high generals began to lose their privileges, and therefore, highly susceptible to corruption. Even General Lebeb, now deceased, and Hans Blix, the head of the arms inspection commission of the United Nations, have stated this, notwithstanding denials by Russian Defense Minister Seguey Ivanov.

Al-Jazeera: How much does a nuclear bomb cost?

Al-Asuquf: Somewhere around US$ 4200 million.

Al-Jazeera: How did Al Queda get this money?

Al-Asuquf: We have numerous sponsors.

Al-Jazeera: Who are they?

Al-Asuquf: There are a number of countries which support us, and also numerous wealthy individuals.

Al-Jazeera: Are all of these countries Arab?

Al-Asuquf: No, there are some European countries as well which have an interest in the fall of the USA.

Al-Jazeera: Who are these wealthy individuals?

Al-Asuquf: People who are also tired of watching the USA suck the wealth out of the rest of the world.

Al-Jazeera: Is Saddam Hussein one of them?

Al-Asuquf: You could say that he's just one of the collaborators, through Abdul Tawab Mullah Hawaish, his vice-prime minister and the person responsible for Iraq's arms program.

Al-Jazeera: Are these atomic bombs powerful ones?

Al-Asuquf: The five Russian devices are from the old T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107s, and their potency is something around 100 kilotons each, that is, 5 times as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani bombs are less powerful, somewhere around 10 kilotons.

Al-Jazeera: Can't the bombs be detected and disarmed by American authorities?

Al-Asuquf: No, in spite of their age they've undergone modernization and are well hidden. Even if they were found, they have autodetonation provisions should anything get close to them. Even electromagnetic pulses would be incapable of deactivating them.

Al-Jazeera: Don't they emit radiation? Can't they be detected?

Al-Asuquf: No. They are wrapped in thick leaden cases.

Al-Jazeera: A suspected Pakistani ship was recently searched and all that was found were lead bars. Does this have anything to do with the bombs?

Al-Asuquf: Yes, however that lead was just an extra layer, and was not essentially necessary.

Al-Jazeera: How will the bombs be detonated?

Al-Asuquf: There are numerous methods, a cell-phone call, radio frequency, seismic shocks or by timer.

Al-Jazeera: Once detonated, how many deaths will be caused by thesebombs?

Al-Asuquf: It depends, since our plans are very malleable and flexible.

Al-Jazeera: So what is the entire plan?

Al-Asuquf: The beginning will be the detonation of a nuclear device, which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this chaos, two or three cropsprayers that are now dismantled and stored in granaries [silos?] close to little-used highways in the countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States. This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari Fleischman (!) will be very busy.

Al-Jazeera: But the American government has guaranteed that within five days it could produce enough smallpox vaccine to inoculate the entire population.

Al-Asuquf: There will be simultaneous suicide attacks against the vaccine production plants.

Al-Jazeera: How many innocent people will die?

Al-Asuquf: According to estimates made by me and Ayman Al-Zawahiro, somewhere around 15 million due to the atomic bombs and their radiation. Of those exposed to smallpox, 25 percent will die, approximately five million, and many more due to the ensuing chaos and disorder.

Al-Jazeera: Which will be the first city?

Al-Asuquf: The first city will be that in which optimal conditions present themselves, for example, clear skies, and winds of eight miles-per- hour or less in the direction of the country's center so that radioactive dust can contaminate the maximum possible area.

Al-Jazeera: Will this attack annihilate the USA?

Al-Asuquf: No. But the process will have begun. Who will buy food products from the United States knowing they may have been contaminated by radiation? Who will travel to the United States knowing the possibility of contracting smallpox? Who will continue to invest in American institutions? Just as with the World Trade Center, it will be simply a question of time before the entire economic structure collapses and turns to dust. If our objectives are reached with one bomb and the smallpox, probably we'll save the lives of others, however that's risky [unlikely?], and it's probable that six more bombs will be detonated, one per week, and other attacks with chemical weapons will be carried out.

Al-Jazeera: What about the American military response?

Al-Asuquf: There will practically be none. Even if five or ten cities were chosen at random to be destroyed, that would still be a small price to pay. The problem is the economic despair will be so great that even economizing by not using arms unnecessarily will occur, since the liquidity of American goods will be almost zero and at that point the United States will make more money selling its Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, which cost about five billion US$, to Turkey or Italy for one billion dollars, since the country will so urgently need to recapitalize, though it will be too late.Moreover, how will the morale of American soldiers be knowing that their entire families have died and their country no longer exists. Fight for what?

Al-Jazeera: And won't the global economy also be ruined?

Al-Asuquf: In the beginning it will be very difficult; a serious economic crisis will ensue. However, without the United States, the world will soon arise in a more just and fraternal manner.

Al-Jazeera: And Israel?

Al-Asuquf: As they say... it will be dessert.

Al-Jazeera: Does bin Laden's spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Gheith, know that you are giving this interview?

Al-Asuquf: It was he and bin Laden who suggested I give it.

Al-Jazeera: Osama bin Laden is still alive?

Al-Asuquf: He is quite healthy, alongside his commanders Mohammed Atef and Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar.

Al-Jazeera: Aren't you fearful that Al Queda's plans will be discovered?

Al-Asuquf: The plan is already in its countdown, and nothing can stop it.

Al-Jazeera: Not even if the United States asks forgiveness and changes its attitudes?

Al-Asuquf: That won't happen, and even if it did, it's too late.

Al-Jazeera: When will the attack begin?

Al-Asuquf: I can't reveal that. Allah Akbar.
 
To be honest, I think that this is horse****. I can believe that an interview took place, and that Al-Jazeera journalist believes that he's reporting the truth. But I think Al-Asuquf is being somewhat lax in his honesty. Some things about what he says in that interview just don't gel.

Al-Asuquf: By provoking a deficit of between $450 and $470 trillion dollars, the equivalent of the United States' GDP for five to seven years.

Al-Jazeera: How will this be done?

Al-Asuquf: With the destruction of the seven largest American cities, along with other measures.

A much better way would be continued, sustained pressure on the dollar by all these countries that supposedly sponsor Al Queda. For example, if the arab oil-producing nations switched to the Euro instead of the US Dollar as their main trading currency, it would wipe a huge amount off the value of the dollar.

Al-Asuquf: No. But the process will have begun. Who will buy food products from the United States knowing they may have been contaminated by radiation? Who will travel to the United States knowing the possibility of contracting smallpox? Who will continue to invest in American institutions? Just as with the World Trade Center, it will be simply a question of time before the entire economic structure collapses and turns to dust. If our objectives are reached with one bomb and the smallpox, probably we'll save the lives of others, however that's risky [unlikely?], and it's probable that six more bombs will be detonated, one per week, and other attacks with chemical weapons will be carried out.

Al-Asuquf, for all his economic academic credentials, seems to be forgetting that a large amount of US corporate wealth is based overseas, and that a large portion of the US domestic market comes from US companies who have their businesses based abroad and then export products back to the USA. Additionally, America can now call upon the oil revenues of Iraq, as well as the wealth generated by the oil pipeline(s) in Afghanistan.

l-Jazeera: How did they get in to the USA?

Al-Asuquf: Before September 11, American security was a fiasco, and even after, were it necessary, we could manage to smuggle bombs into the United States. They entered through seaports, as normal cargo.

Al-Jazeera: How is that possible?

Al-Asuquf: A nuclear device is no bigger than a refrigerator; therefore, it can be easily camouflaged as one. Millions of cargo containers arrive in seaports each day, and no matter how efficient security is, it's impossible to check, search through and examine each container.

That's a huge risk to take. Why spend $4.2B on a nuke and then chance that it will somehow make it through customs? If they are already in the USA, and were before 9/11 - yes the security was lax, but it's still a huge risk. Porky-pies, here I think.

Al-Jazeera: And won't the global economy also be ruined?

Al-Asuquf: In the beginning it will be very difficult; a serious economic crisis will ensue. However, without the United States, the world will soon arise in a more just and fraternal manner.

Interest rates in the USA have recently gone down. Without going into a big explanation, suffice to say that in past years America has been spending and Europe has been saving. With the drop in interest rates in the USA, it seems like we are entering a new economic cycle, with America trying to consoliate it's wealth by saving, and Europe becoming the big spenders for now.

Al-Jazeera: Who are these wealthy individuals?

Al-Asuquf: People who are also tired of watching the USA suck the wealth out of the rest of the world.

Al-Jazeera: Is Saddam Hussein one of them?

Al-Asuquf: You could say that he's just one of the collaborators, through Abdul Tawab Mullah Hawaish, his vice-prime minister and the person responsible for Iraq's arms program.

This is interesting. Al Queda have never said this before. It seems more than likely that Al Queda are now twisting current events to their own use in order to try and recruit more Arabs. In fact, this whole interview seems to be aimed more at the youth of the Middle East, than at the West.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I certainly don't want to be be blind to the truth, or try and wish that everything was okay in the face of overwhelming danger, but I think this interview should be taken with a rather large pinch of salt.
 
I agree with zulu, this is just a bit of AQ propaganda aimed at causing a little more fear than necessary. We must remember that 9/11 or 11/9 itself was not supposed to be 5000 casuality causing event, it was supposed to be a shocker to the US. That it caused the collapse of the WTC towers was not anticipated by the organizers.
Moreover, AQ has no real idea of what it is talking about and the figures to prove this. For start, the US GDP is about $10 trillion and its deficit is about $500-550 billion dollars. This is all a strategy to make the enemy seem more powerful and try to undermine one's strength, attempting "greatness" in the process.
Plus, if the AQ wanted to destroy the US with nuclear weapons, why plan and execute 9/11. Crucially, if "one phone call" could be made to get these "martyrs" into action, why was'nt it done when the attacks on Afghanistan began. Crucially, why were'nt the so-called nukes detonated or at least the threat held out when the US began its operations in 2002?
The strategy in this interview is to cause a state of panic in the US. To understand the logic, one needs to look paradoxically at the Bible and the story of Gideon.
When given the task of facing a large, well trained army with 10,000 warriors, he chose only the 300 with the nerves he thought necessary for what he had in mind. He knew an all out assault was futile and a waste, so he attacked at night, when the enemies were asleep. No, let me rephrase that, he did'nt attack, but pretended to attack, with bright lights, loud noise and dust. The sleeping soldiers woke up and assumed their worst. IN their panic, they started fleeing and best of all, they started hacking each other, making Gideon and his men's job a LOT easier.
Here too, Al Qaeda knows that it cannot hope to take on the US militarily and hence assymetric warfare is needed. They cannot fight the US, so they make them believe that they are facing an insurmountable enemy and resistance futile. By this, they hope to cause panic and confusion, without so much as throwing a firecracker in the direction of the US and thus claim great victory.
 
This interview has to be a fake. This "Al Qaeda" guy doesn't sound like a jihadie at all, more like a typical anti-american leftist. In fact the interview reads like they interviewed the militant twin of Noam Chomsky. If this is real the whole "liberals = terrorist supporting anti-americans" suddenly sounds very reasonable. Because if Al Qaeda guys really talk like this then they are either inspired by Chomsky or Chomsky is a member of Al Qaeda.
 
I haven't read the story because it was quite long (I'll do it later don't worry ;)). However, I'm not surprised at all about that. Pakistan is a nuclear power where the fundamentalists are controlling both the secret services and the army. So it's really easy for them to get a nuclear head if they want.

But for which damn' reason would they use it ? We all know they are crazy and pure evil but that's not the point. If such a thing would happen, people will know from where the nuclear head would come and the answer will be immediate. Why fundamentalists would support the destruction of the whole Pakistan if not more ?

For now, the best interest fundamentalists have is to topple Musharaf and to control Pakistan. Once they'll have the power there, no one will be able to do anything against them. In some way, it's already the case. Fundamentalists are very strong and Musharraf like better diplomacy and negociation with them than just a mere "fight against terror". However, did anyone attempt to kill him thrice recently ?
 
I hope you're all right about it being fake, I really do...
They can bluf all they want, and it's probably bluf, but when you think about the risk if they are not bluffing...
 
If this is a factual and true statement from an Al Queda official .......

Sigh....

Al Qaida does not have officials.

It is not a corporation with a BoD, shareholders and press informers.
 
Al-Jazeera: Aren't you fearful that Al Queda's plans will be discovered?

Too bad. We've already found it out.:p

Not that I believe them. Snopes truly saved the day. I have to agree with zulu, this is just a load of Al-Qaeda propoganda.

I persoanally think Al-Qaeda is locked away in Pakistani-Afghani mountains. I think it'd be darn near impossible to develop nukes in those conditions, much less smuggle some.
 
This interview is indeed a more subtle form of terrorism, i.e. create fear by threats only.

Personlly, I think the whole interview is a pile of rubbish and would bet my money that it never took place. Someone is just trying to rile people up.
 
Originally posted by Mario Feldberg
This interview has to be a fake. This "Al Qaeda" guy doesn't sound like a jihadie at all, more like a typical anti-american leftist. In fact the interview reads like they interviewed the militant twin of Noam Chomsky. If this is real the whole "liberals = terrorist supporting anti-americans" suddenly sounds very reasonable. Because if Al Qaeda guys really talk like this then they are either inspired by Chomsky or Chomsky is a member of Al Qaeda.

Anti-american, perhaps, but LEFTIST? What are you smoking? AL Qaeda is a DEEPLY conservative fundamentalist terror group, leftists believe in liberation of all races and sexes (something fundamentalists don't want) as well as the fact that Osama bin Laden FOUGHT the USSR during the invasion of Afghanistan!

I find it very amusing how you use a threat by the complete opposite of the left wing to degrade and attack a prominent left-winger. So sad how simple minded people can get in these times of jingoism.
 
This is just bullcrap propaganda to scare the west. Al-Qaeda is not a credible threat to the west and giving them a forum to voice their sicko views just makes us look like frightened little infidels. Ok so they do have bases in weak liberal guilt countries like France, UK, Sweden and Germany from where to voice their islaminazi bullcrap to try to scare us. Big deal. Let's say they pull of a briefcase nuke in central London or Paris at rush hour. The hammer would come down like Thor was in the house and ready to run amok.
 
Oh, so they aren't a threat, that's just great.

That justifies attacking Irak, as a pre-emtive strike cause it has bonds with Al-Quada of course.
Good to know you put the UK in with the rest of us islaminazi liberals, might wanna post that in the thread about britain.

Oh, before I forget, 9/11..., nop, defenitly not a threat
 
That was written by an American, for Americans. It should have no relevance in international affairs.
 
I don't think the number 3 man at al queda is this stupid, telling the US plans which could only help the US. Not to mention i've never heard of a nuclear device having an automatic detonation, and if they had them why not use them surely one of those cities has had a day with 8 mph winds. 10 kilotons i didn't know they made bombs that small. Small pox after a nuclear attack that's like shooting a dead man there's no point.

I'm going to have to say this report is false and was probably made by someone with too much time on his hands
 
Back
Top Bottom