Antifa rocks!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, I definitely look ridiculous for mocking you because you genuinely partake in "wishful thinking" about eugenics. Once again you've slipped on your inverse perspective glasses so that your moral trench appears to you to be the high ground.

Peak irony only looks high when you're small... His response required more thought :( The anti-fascist likes eugenics now, thats funny

what kind of ******* psycho shoots someone over an orange juice even if she was trying to steal it?

Wait a minute, if she was trying to steal it wouldn't that make you the lying piece of filth?

She didn't shoot her over the OJ, getting punched in the head led to that tragedy. The clerk was not used to handling a gun and apparently it had a hair trigger and she passed out after it went off. Or maybe the several Korean merchants killed in robberies had something to do with her elevated sense of fear. It might have been more accidental than intentional.
 
Last edited:
Wait a minute, if she was trying to steal it wouldn't that make you the lying piece of filth?

I guess you still haven't grasped the concept behind the phrase "for the sake of argument"

or more likely, you're just trolling as you are wont to do
 
Last edited:
Peak irony only looks high when you're small... His response required more thought :( The anti-fascist likes eugenics now, thats funny



Wait a minute, if she was trying to steal it wouldn't that make you the lying piece of filth?

She didn't shoot her over the OJ, getting punched in the head led to that tragedy. The clerk was not used to handling a gun and apparently it had a hair trigger and she passed out after it went off. Or maybe the several Korean merchants killed in robberies had something to do with her elevated sense of fear. It might have been more accidental than intentional.

The jury didn't think so but apparently you know better.
 
The jury didn't care if she was shoplifting - the clerk was on trial and the assault and self defense explanation were the issues they were considering. I saw the video, the OJ was in her back pack. Is that how you shop, put stuff in your back pack and then attack clerks for griping?
 
The jury didn't care if she was shoplifting - the clerk was on trial and the assault and self defense explanation were the issues they were considering. I saw the video, the OJ was in her back pack. Is that how you shop, put stuff in your back pack and then attack clerks for griping?

And she then went to the counter offering the shopkeeper money. Eyewitnesses (you know, people who unlike you were actually there) confirmed it.
 
It's just wishful thinking, I seriously wish that we could purge conservatism from the gene pool but we can't and I know that it doesn't even really follow from what Pinker says. Really all I was doing was trying to make the usual suspects look ridiculous by getting them to say stuff like this:
Yeah, I think I wanted the "nuh uh" to show I wasn't taking your post that seriously. But then I started pontificating anyway because it felt like a good way to procrastinate
 
@AmazonQueen I truly admire your patience in dealing with people who spend their free time looking for reasons the black teenager deserved to be shot

Stubborness, not patience. My sister and I once spent a very long time arguing about who was most argumentative. All a bit pot, kettle :D
 
Stubborness, not patience. My sister and I once spent a very long time arguing about who was most argumentative. All a bit pot, kettle :D

I'm argumentative too and stubborn af but as you can see it doesn't take long for me to get nasty in this kind of discussion....you stay cool, I admire that
 
I mean literal white nationalists still operate on this website with impunity so where is the bias?

Literally? Or is this the new ironic hipster definition of literally that means "figuratively" or "not really"? For example, "Trump is literally Hitler" is less strong than just saying "Trump is Hitler" without the modifier.
 
I mean literal white nationalists still operate on this website with impunity so where is the bias?
If it's not biased towards white nationalists then it is biased against them. The whole us vs. them mentality.
 
And she then went to the counter offering the shopkeeper money. Eyewitnesses (you know, people who unlike you were actually there) confirmed it.

Or she offered money for the OJ after the clerk busted her. Do you think she just handed the clerk $2 without trying to buy anything? Are you in the habit of handing clerks money with no items to buy? It doesn't make sense. As for witnesses, the clerk knew better than them what happened. Do you think the clerk took the money and then accused the girl of shoplifting?

The 2 people I'm relying on are the clerk and the girl in the video - both of them acted like someone was caught shoplifting. How do you hand a clerk $2 for OJ and not even put it on the counter to show the clerk what you're buying? Whether or not she was shoplifting is irrelevant to the charge against the clerk, the only reason we're talking about it is Lex called people pieces of lying filth for thinking she was a shoplifter. How dare they!

@AmazonQueen I truly admire your patience in dealing with people who spend their free time looking for reasons the black teenager deserved to be shot

When I said she was shoplifting it wasn't to justify shooting her, it was just a description about what led to the struggle and shooting. But that upset you for some reason even though you said 'for the sake of argument', so what if she was a shoplifter? What if? Did I say she deserved to die for that? No, I said the clerk didn't have the right of self defense and should have done serious time for killing the girl. Now if the clerk had shot her during the attack she could have a legal justification. You should try to be more accurate if you're inclined to call people liars.

I don't. Since IRL such people deserve to be beaten to pulp, but the medium doesn't allow that, I think patience is totally unwarranted and the only solution is ostracism at the level allowed by the medium. Answering the bigots just encourages them, and since site management refuses to do anything about them other than offer protection until we get widespread ostracism in place we are stuck with them.

You and Lex remind me of the neighborhood kid who takes his ball and runs home when he doesn't get his way. If you'd like the opportunity to beat anyone to a pulp you'll have to put down the bag of chips and climb out of the recliner. You're actually complaining about how people are protected from your fighting prowess while you sit behind a computer? You are protected. What the medium allows is debate and you're ill-equipped so you just act obnoxious and talk about how you'd beat people up IRL.

Rather convenient that y'all can continue these long winded string of insults that can go so far as saying that posters here deserve beatings yet mod action only starts the moment anyone bites back with far less aggressive undertones.

Please dont stick your neck out on my behalf, seriously. I appreciate it but you'll just become a target for the armchair Antifa crusaders around here.
 
The paradox of tolerance is really the end of the argument, nobody can refute it but the thread just keeps on going anyway.
The line is drawn very simply.

Free speech is to be upheld.
Violence is not acceptable.

Violently attacking "adjacent" people judged by vigilantes for "enabling potential future violence" is obviously wrong and cannot be tolerated.

If force must be used to stop violence, then the force users must be those with the judgement to discern between those who are being violent and those who are considered on the same team.
 
Please dont stick your neck out on my behalf, seriously. I appreciate it but you'll just become a target for the armchair Antifa crusaders around here.
Was gonna stay clear of that particular argument but the complete disrespect for forum rules got to me. I understand that due to the nature of OT there has to be some leniency, but my own game discussions on CFC(well, not so much in the Civ6 forum) led me to expect better from users here. I guess I just wasn't around long enough to know better back when I gained such respect for this site.
 
Or she offered money for the OJ after the clerk busted her. Do you think she just handed the clerk $2 without trying to buy anything? Are you in the habit of handing clerks money with no items to buy? It doesn't make sense. As for witnesses, the clerk knew better than them what happened. Do you think the clerk took the money and then accused the girl of shoplifting?

The 2 people I'm relying on are the clerk and the girl in the video - both of them acted like someone was caught shoplifting. How do you hand a clerk $2 for OJ and not even put it on the counter to show the clerk what you're buying? Whether or not she was shoplifting is irrelevant to the charge against the clerk, the only reason we're talking about it is Lex called people pieces of lying filth for thinking she was a shoplifter. How dare they!

But ignoring that the LAPD watched the videos and decided that what was in them was consistant with what the witnesses said.
Tell me do you always put the worst possible interpretation on victims actions or is that only when they are black?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom