Eukaryote
Deity
They say people are more likley to shoot a family member than an intruder, does that mean handguns are pointless?
Please specify if your answer is no.
Please specify if your answer is no.
Drool4Res-pect said:They say people are more likley to shoot a family member than an intruder, does that mean handguns are pointless?
Drool4Res-pect said:They say people are more likley to shoot a family member than an intruder, does that mean handguns are pointless?
IglooDude said:Well, for starters, when they say that, they are incorrect.
Tulkas12 said:Wow igloo I think you just effectively ended this discussion.
Hate to be a partykiller, but that link doesn't say they're wrong, only that their evidence is wrong.IglooDude said:Well, for starters, when they say that, they are incorrect.
The Last Conformist said:Hate to be a partykiller, but that link doesn't say they're wrong, only that their evidence is wrong.
Not necessarily. If I have an incorrect premise (the moon is made of cheese) then I can come to a correct conclusion (the moon is far away from earth) by use of normal logic (because otherwise we'd smell the cheese).Tulkas12 said:Which would lead to their conclusions being wrong. . .
If I have made even one person aware that that long-ago study that alleges "a homeowner's gun was 43 times more likely to kill a family member, friend, or acquaintence, than it was used to kill someone in self-defense" has enough flaws and distortions in it to make Baghdad Bob blush, then I've had a good day.
GinandTonic said:In the uk very few handguns = very few people shot. You want to defend your property? Why do you need a concealable weapon? Only criminals need to be able to conceal weapons, along with a very few security types etc.
North King said:Of course they are pointless. Forming a viable civilian revolution is silly, when the vaunted handguns run into tanks.![]()