Ask a Girl

Status
Not open for further replies.
Okay, here's one:

Why the heck do some girls toy with men's feelings?!?

Maybe because they just got out of thousands of years of doing the dishes and pumping out kids while their men had fun with the maids at the tavern?

How hard is it to tell the truth? I've yet to encounter a woman who's not been a filthy liar.

Wow. Yeah, because men sure never have mistresses and secrets. And men are soooooo open about their feelings! I mean, look in this thread, how easy it is for all the guys to go up and tell the truth about girls they like!

Men aren't supposed to shave their legs. Or arms. Its just not right. It can't be done.

Not right? What has right and wrong gotta do with shaving your legs?

Yet somehow girls seem to have no problem with such a symbol of flamboyant homosexuality. Whats wrong with them? They want metrosexuals or somethinhg? Bah!

It seems you have very conservative views about sexuality. Here's a hint: sexuality has not much to do with the amount of body hair. Now get out of your cave, captain caveman.

So, why don't women like porn? This is something I truly cannot fathom?:confused:

probably because in most porn, women are humiliated sexual objects whose only goal is to satisfy men's urges, while pretending to have an orgasm?

I don't get it. Why do women like to be friends with homosexuals so much? And why do they like metrosexuals?

So messed up....there's two guys like that at my school who are both respectively and they're friends with all the girls, but all the guys hate them, bully them, and beat them up on an almost daily basis. One was actually beaten up today....so why do girls want to be friends with them?

It seems you can't take a hint from the ladies... apparently they're not so found of the alpha male model anymore ;)
Also I have to say that I rather despise what you say about bullying people who do not fit the chauvinist norm, and not understanding why women do not like "real" men. What next, crucifying homosexuals on fences while you pulli girls by the hair and drag them to the nearest bush in order to have sex?
 
It seems you can't take a hint from the ladies... apparently they're not so found of the alpha male model anymore ;)

Actually, it is still the alpha male who is preferred, only now, it has simply shifted to the more Easter, Krishna-like alpha male who is preferred.

Also I have to say that I rather despise what you say about bullying people who do not fit the chauvinist norm,

Agreed.

and not understanding why women do not like "real" men.

Again, the definition of "real man" has matured vastly in the past century, at least in the West.

Krishna represents the epitome of what the ideal of a male is moving towards in the West.

What next, crucifying homosexuals on fences while you pulli girls by the hair and drag them to the nearest bush in order to have sex?

:lol:
 
I don't want to discredit the Krishna alpha male, but to me it's pretty simple and it has probably always been that way: Women are attracted to men that are confidant, that have a strong and stable personality and that act according to those qualities. Thats all needed to be a so called "real man".

Notice that you don't have to be an @sshole to have those qualities, but you can be one even if you have them.
 
I don't want to discredit the Krishna alpha male, but to me it's pretty simple and it has probably always been that way: Women are attracted to men that are confidant, that have a strong and stable personality and that act according to those qualities. Thats all needed to be a so called "real man".

Notice that you don't have to be an @sshole to have those qualities, but you can be one even if you have them.

And you certainly don't need facial and body hair to have those qualities :)
 
I don't want to discredit the Krishna alpha male, but to me it's pretty simple and it has probably always been that way: Women are attracted to men that are confidant, that have a strong and stable personality and that act according to those qualities. Thats all needed to be a so called "real man".

Krishna was an epitome of all of these qualities.

He was kind, caring, sensitive, and had a great sense of humour. He was also a master psychologist, knowing exactly what a men and women wanted, at what time, to what end.

He was also not hesitant to show his harder side, when the time came.

That is why I call him a more "mature" archetype than the caveman-style alpha male.
 
It seems you have very conservative views about sexuality. Here's a hint: sexuality has not much to do with the amount of body hair. Now get out of your cave, captain caveman.

NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! But I grew a beard like the guy in my avatar and I'm growing long sexy hair!!! NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! I like stopped shaving and cutting my hair and grew it over spring break. Then I came back to find that everyone had shaved and had a hair cut. The state of modern society is sad....take pride in your bodily hair. I'm proud of my exccedingly hairy legs, and hairy face! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It seems you can't take a hint from the ladies... apparently they're not so found of the alpha male model anymore
Also I have to say that I rather despise what you say about bullying people who do not fit the chauvinist norm, and not understanding why women do not like "real" men. What next, crucifying homosexuals on fences while you pulli girls by the hair and drag them to the nearest bush in order to have sex?

Well....I wouldn't mind that.... hehe

I have nothing against homosexuals...except their more sucessful with girls than me or anyone else...ah for the good old days of carrying women off from your horse....
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! But I grew a beard like the guy in my avatar and I'm growing long sexy hair!!! NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! I like stopped shaving and cutting my hair and grew it over spring break. Then I came back to find that everyone had shaved and had a hair cut. The state of modern society is sad....take pride in your bodily hair. I'm proud of my exccedingly hairy legs, and hairy face! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Maybe one day someone will explain to me why Indians must wear a moustache. Indians, or Mexicans, for that matter.


Well....I wouldn't mind that.... hehe
:vomit:


I have nothing against homosexuals...except their more sucessful with girls than me or anyone else...
:lol: I think it's the first time I've seen someone calling guys succesful with girls "homosexuals".

ah for the good old days of carrying women off from your horse....

Ah yeah, those good times when women just had to shut up. And when non-white men had to, too.
(just so that you have a hint on how disgusting I find your views on women).
 
Maybe one day someone will explain to me why Indians must wear a moustache. Indians, or Mexicans, for that matter.

We don't have to, but most of us look better with it.

:vomit:

:lol: I think it's the first time I've seen someone calling guys succesful with girls "homosexuals".

Ah yeah, those good times when women just had to shut up. And when non-white men had to, too.
(just so that you have a hint on how disgusting I find your views on women).

You've made the mistake of taking him seriously.

He's being humorous, sarcastic.

;)
 
Well, we can all agree you're not a gentleman ;)
If you define a gentleman as someone who treats women different just because they're women, then I'm not, and I don't want to be. If you define gentleman as someone who is generally courteous and tries to be kind and do the right thing, then I am, or at least I want to be. I don't go around smacking girls for the fun of it, if they don't hit me then I don't hit them. (And when I do, it's always lightly and in a joking manner) Basically, I just do the same with them as I would with guys. (There are some things I wouldn't do or say to a girl that I would with a guy, just because it would be awkward. But I don't believe in letting women get away with something that I wouldn't let a guy get away with)

yup, we want it all. but hands down to you for fighting back. we will walk alll over you if you let us! totally agree that its acceptable to fight back, but maybe with some consideration for size. ie. a girl will be hurt much more easily than another man
Well yeah, of course. I don't beat them black and blue, and I doubt that I've ever actually hurt one of them. It's generally a proportional response, which generally leads them more exasperated and puzzled than hurting.

At least you're honest about what women want, though. Most don't seem to want to admit that women want to get all the advantages of the old system but still be able to act like men too. Most women these days seem to insist that all they want is "equality", but still squawks whenever anything they don't like happens.

Masquerouge said:
Maybe because they just got out of thousands of years of doing the dishes and pumping out kids while their men had fun with the maids at the tavern?
I think that's a rather bizarre explanation. I think women play with mens minds because they can, and because doing so can be fun. And I very much doubt that this is a recent phenomena, as you seem to suggest - I'd be willing to bet Adam spent many a sleepless night asking God why Eve was so bizarre. ;)
 
I think that's a rather bizarre explanation. I think women play with mens minds because they can, and because doing so can be fun. And I very much doubt that this is a recent phenomena, as you seem to suggest - I'd be willing to bet Adam spent many a sleepless night asking God why Eve was so bizarre. ;)

Well I think that men also play with women's minds, in a more institutionalized manner.
And also it's not until recently (historically-wise, meaning 100-150 years) that women were allowed to do a lot of things they just couldn't before, and that discussions between men and women started getting interesting - you could say that's because women suddenly had more freedom and more weapons to play with our minds, and I wouldn't disagree too hard :)

Note that I also agree with you: nothing annoys me more than a woman asking for equal rights but actually wanting the benefits of both worlds.
 
Why is it that women always go for the strong muscular men and cast asside the fat and ugly men!? :mad:
 
Why is it that women always go for the strong muscular men and cast asside the fat and ugly men!? :mad:

because it appears that strong muscular men can take care of their bodies better than fat people can.
ugly is an opinion of appearance.
wouldn't you rather be with a thin attractive woman than a fat ugly zitty one?
 
Why is it that women always go for the strong muscular men and cast asside the fat and ugly men!? :mad:

Probably for the same reason that men go for the women with nice faces, smiles, eyes, hair, and breasts. ;)
 
Well I think that men also play with women's minds, in a more institutionalized manner.
And also it's not until recently (historically-wise, meaning 100-150 years) that women were allowed to do a lot of things they just couldn't before, and that discussions between men and women started getting interesting - you could say that's because women suddenly had more freedom and more weapons to play with our minds, and I wouldn't disagree too hard :)

Note that I also agree with you: nothing annoys me more than a woman asking for equal rights but actually wanting the benefits of both worlds.
I think that's bunk. I think women have been playing with men's minds as long as men have had them. Women, generally speaking, had less political power and rights in most past societies, but I'd bet if you looked at how the majority of people act with their spouses or significant others, it probably hasn't changed much over the millenia. Men are men, and women are women, no matter what century they were born in.
 
because it appears that strong muscular men can take care of their bodies better than fat people can.
That is the thing that irks me is that women chose muscular men over average or fat men. I'm not neather overweight nor Muscular. I eat right and I do Karate twice a week and yet they still chose muscular he-men over average joe.

wouldn't you rather be with a thin attractive woman than a fat ugly zitty one?
Yes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom