Ask a Muslim, Part II

I'm not sure why you are ignoring my post regarding 'original sin' and 'dispensationalism' because it is truly at the core of your misunderstanding of Christianity, Saladin.

That is the true reason why Christianity does not immerse itself in 1st century culture, or in Old Testament laws.

I'm not sure if anyone ever tried to explain this to you before, but you have a profound lack of understanding about Christianity. Evidently you don't want to explore that. Of course that is your right, which is, my next subject.

Someone said this:

The simple fact of the matter is that you are painting a picture of Islam that is of a particular interpretation. Instead of tolerance for other interpretations, you often decry them as basically false, in particular that of less fundamentalist interpretations. It's entirely your right, of course, but it offers nothing toward tolerance, especially since you are talking about how a different interpretation is a "cult". That's a loaded term, one which implies that because something is a cult, freedom of religion should be discouraged for that particular interpretation. You gave the example that Mormons are not considered Christians by Christians - but no person who would claim to be promoting tolerance would argue like that.

The fact of the matter is that tolerance of other religions requires one to assume secularly that one religion is not any more true than another - one may of course, believe that is not the case, (One's own religion is the One True Faith after all) but it doesn't change the fact that it is a fundamental part of freedom of religion.

Actually this is not truly accurate.

Tolerance of other religions does NOT require anyone and everyone to assume that one religion is not more true than the other. That is atheistic/moral relativism that is totally unacceptable to spiritually minded individuals.

The tolerance of other religions by those who are religious is because of FREE WILL. This is the core value in Christianity. Adam and Eve were FREE to choose which path they would follow. All men are FREE to choose, God has gifted us with free will, we can choose evil. If a man has no choice, there is no free will, and there is no decision.

Read some of the John Leland above. He expresses it better than I, but the bottom line is this:

THERE SHOULD BE A FREE MARKET OF IDEAS. The best idea will win. We must allow all spiritual ideas to form without restraint. Only in that environment can we truly, honestly choose God or reject Him.

Anything less than a free market of ideas only cheapens our own convictions. If we feel we must DEMAND submission from mankind, then they did not choose. Then we do not have confidence that our idea, our particular religion is the right one.

If we must force others to do as we think God wants them to do, then God has no power, only we do.
 
Has the thought that perhaps, no gods exists. That the Bible, Qu'ran.. other religious texts are fairy tales. That it was purely created by men trying to find a sense to their life?

How in your opinion religions were formed? Why are the Christians, Muslims and Jewish God the right one. Why aren't the Norse gods, Roman gods and Greek gods the true ones?


The reason why Norse gods, Roman, Greek and Mayan gods were rejected is because of the practices they performed in order to stay in favor with that god.

Human sacrifice, temple prostitution, cannibalism, infanticide, these things collide with the conscience. When Christianity came to places like Scandanavia, with teachings that confirmed basic human nature that says murder is evil, it was accepted over the pagan gods who demanded that evil deeds be done in the name of God.

In our hearts, we know these things are wrong. So when a replacement comes, a philosophy that teaches love, forgivenenss, humility, gentleness, hope, caring for the old, the sick, the orphans, it was accepted with enthusiasm.
 
What are your feelings towards non-Muslims? Especially Hindus and other religions who are not considered "people of the book."

Are they wrong for believing what they do?
Should they be chastized for believing what they do?
Are they damned for not believing in Allah?

Hello, Brother. :salute:

I believe that Islam is the One True path to God, and all other Paths to God are misguidance. However, I am not to insult others for choosing another path but rather only to exhort to them in the best and most kind of ways to come to Islam, as Allah says:

"You shall invite to the path of your Lord with wisdom and kind enlightenment, and debate with them in the best possible manner. Your Lord knows best who has strayed from His path, and He knows best who are the guided ones." (Quran, 16:125)

Notice in the above verse that Allah stresses that only He Knows who are the guided ones and who are the misguided ones. Therefore, it would be foolish for me to claim that I myself am superior to anyone else or that I am guided or Paradise-bound, etc. I have no right to do that, as only Allah knows best in this matter.

I believe Islam is good for you, and it is good for all humanity. It is a treasure and I wish to share that treasure with others, so that they too may benefit from it. It is not something to force upon others as a burden upon them, but rather it is a gift to bestow upon them as a mercy.

As for Non-Muslims--no matter if they are People of the Book or pagans--are to be treated with softness, kindness, respect, and compassion. This was the methodology of Prophet Muhammad (s). There are so many examples of the Prophet's extreme kindness that it would be difficult to mention all of them. My personal favorite is the story of how the Prophet (s) would often walk underneath an old woman's apartment on his way to some place, and that woman--who was an anti-Islam pagan--used to dump her garbage on the Prophet (s) every day. This went on for many days until one day the Prophet (s) went by her apartment but she did not throw garbage that day. The Prophet (s) became worried about the old woman wondering if she might be ill, and so he visited her to console her.

Or there is the example of Prophet Moses (as) who would address Pharaoh in the nicest, kindest, and softest manner. And no Muslim on earth is as good as Prophet Moses (as), and no person on earth is as evil or misguided as Pharaoh!

I believe that all people are Children of Adam (as) and should be treated with respect and dignity.

Prophet Muhammad (s) said: "Whoever hurts a Non-Muslim citizen of a Muslim state, hurts me..."

And the Prophet (s) said: "He who hurts a Non-Muslim citizen of a Muslim state, I am his adversary, and I shall be his adversary on the Day of a Judgement."

And the Prophet (s) warned: "Beware on the Day of Judgement: I shall myself be a complainant against him who wrongs a Non-Muslim citizen of a Muslim state or he who lays on him (the Non-Muslim) a responsibility greater than he can bear or deprives him of anything that belongs to him."

And there are many other Prophetic Sayings which advise kindness and softness towards Non-Muslims.

Should Islam be forced upon the non-believers?

It is strictly forbidden (Haram) in Islam to forcibly convert people to Islam.

Allah says in the Quran:

"There is no compulsion in religion." (Quran, 2:256)

"If it had been Allah's plan, they would not have taken false gods: but We have not appointed you a keeper over their (own) doings, nor are you placed in charge of them." (Quran, 6:107)

"He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah: But if any turn away, We have not sent you (O Muhammad) as a keeper over their own doings." (Quran, 4:80)

"He said: 'O My People! If I act upon a clear direction from my Lord Who has bestowed on me from Himself the merciful talent of seeing the right way, does it make sense then that we can force you to take the right path when you definitely decline to take it?'"
(Quran, 11:28)

"And tell My servants that they should speak in a most kindly manner (unto those who do not share their beliefs). Verily, Satan is always ready to stir up discord between men, for verily, Satan is man's foe...Hence, We have not sent you as a warden over them in charge of their (own) affairs." (Quran, 17:53-54)

"We have not sent you (O Muhammad) except that you be a mercy to all mankind. Declare: 'Verily, what is revealed to me is this, your God is the only One God...' But if they turn away, then (simply) say: 'I have delivered the Truth in a manner clear to one and all.'" (Quran, Chapter 21)

"To every people have We appointed (different) ceremonies and rites which they observe; therefore, let them not wrangle over this matter with you, but do invite them to turn to your Lord. You indeed are rightly guided. But if they still dispute you in this matter, then (simply) say: 'God best knows the value of what you do.' Allah will judge between you on the Day of Resurrection concerning that wherein you used to differ." (Quran, 22:68-69)

"Say: 'Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away (from faith), he is only responsible for the duty placed on him and you for that placed on you. If you obey him, you shall be on right guidance. The Messenger's duty is only to preach..." (Quran, 24:54)

"And so, exhort them (to believe)! Your task is only to exhort; you cannot compel them to believe."
(Quran, 88:21-22)

"Assuredly, We (Allah) have sent down the Book to you in right form for the good of man. Whosoever guided himself by it does so to his own advantage, and whosoever turns away from it does so at his own loss. You (O Muhammad) certainly are not a keeper over their (own) affairs." (Quran, 39:41)

"And those who take patrons other than Allah, Allah (Himself) is a Warden over them, and you (O Muhammad) have no charge over them (yourself)." (Quran, 42:6)

"If they then run away, We have not sent you as a warden over them. Your duty is but to preach." (Quran, 42:48)

"Then obey Allah and obey the Messenger, but if you turn away (from faith), no blame shall be on our Messenger, for the duty of Our Messenger is just to deliver the Message." (Quran, 64:12)

Take care, Brother. :salute:
 
I'm not sure why you are ignoring my post

Why does everyone keep telling me this? :confused:

Don't you realize that I am only one person, currently in medical school, and I have very little time, and even still I am trying my utmost to reply fully to posts. Just because I do not address your post immediately does not mean that you have stumped me or that suddenly you win and I lose. It simply means that I am replying to someone else's post, and Allah Willing, I will get around to answering your post as well. I'm answering posts in order.

Take care, Sister. :salute:
 
Would you still love your child all the same and still consider him family if he became athiest?

If you dont have a child lets assume you have one now in the future.
 
مرحبا

كيف حالك؟

Bi Khair, Al-Hamdulilah. :)

Just to be clear your not saying that Allah and God are different, only the people who follow a Christian God are not following Allah's will as they should, yes?

Yes. You are correct. In reality, all three of the Abrahamic faiths (Jews, Christians, and Muslims) worship the same God. However, all three religions say that the same God did or said different things. I, for one, do not believe that God said the things He did in the Old Testament, such as the numerous verses in which He advocates His Prophets to massacre people of certain cities. However, the Christians believe that their God said and did those things, so I was simply trying to show that the Christian vision of God differs in that respect. Perhaps my wording was not appropriate, and I apologize for the confusion.

If you open up an Arabic Bible, you will find that the word for God is always "Allah". Arab Christians always use the word "Allah" instead of "God". They mean the same thing, and are just a difference of languages.

However, we Muslims do believe that "Allah" is the proper name of God, and that "God" is simply a translation of the proper name of Allah. Jesus (as) spoke Aramaic, and in Aramaic--which is the sister language of Arabic--the word for God is "Allah" or commonly transliterated as "Elah". In Hebrew, it is "Eloah". All three of these (Allah, Elah, and Eloah) are just different ways of pronouncing the same word, such as saying "Saladin" in English and "Salah Ad-Deen" in Arabic. Same word, just different pronounciation.

It is funny that sometimes the laity amongst the Christians will make fun of the term "Allah" unknowing that it is the same word used by Prophet Jesus (as) and that the word "God" was never used by Prophet Jesus (as). I've even heard many of them make fun of and mock "Allah" as if it is some pagan god or something. Of course, I understand that it is only a minority of Christians who would be intolerant like that, and I think that most Christians are tolerant of the word "Allah" and know it refers to the same One God as they worship themselves.

Take care, Brother. :salute:
 
Moderator Action: This is not 'debate a muslim' or 'attack a muslim' or 'tell a muslim they are wrong' thread. Members ask questions to try and gather more of an understanding of the viewpoint of someone else that may not otherwise be readily available.

Wow, very kind of you, sir. Thank you.
 
Katheryn said:
Actually this is not truly accurate.

Tolerance of other religions does NOT require anyone and everyone to assume that one religion is not more true than the other. That is atheistic/moral relativism that is totally unacceptable to spiritually minded individuals.
First of all, I didn't mean actually assuming that one religion is more true than the other. That is of course, absurd for someone who believes that his religion is the One True Faith. However, the issue is to pretend like it is, for the sake of tolerating others. Treating people how others would like to be treated - the issue of pretending is so that one doesn't say to another that his way is the true way.

As well, religion has nothing to do with moral relativism. If anything, it's cultural relativism. But even then, I'm not implying that all cultures are equal - just that the sane thing to do is to tolerate all religions which do not cause harm, and that it is a danger to accuse a religion of harm unless there is sufficient evidence. (And no, what you say doesn't count as evidence) Regardless, it's not moral relativism because it has nothing to do with morals, outside of the fact that it is a moral.

It also has nothing to do with atheism - yes, it's secular, but it has nothing to do with believing in the fact that there actually is no god. The concept was derived through the various problems that the sects of Christianity, and atheism wasn't even remotely popular at the time, so I don't see how you can say it is atheist.

Though I will admit that it isn't necessary to pretend that a "false religion" is just as equal as your own religion, it's extremely helpful. As well, when arguing secularly, that is the truth of the matter, since religious truth cannot be found through reason alone because the premises which are assumed to be self-evident, (those that require faith) arn't.

By the way, only the Abrahamic religions follow a One True Faith style. Dharmic religions don't, and would have something akin to "religious relativism" (moreso in the sense of ) - but aneeshm could probably explain it better than me.

Besides, I don't think you are the best expert to be talking about religious tolerance, as you are quite intolerant of certain religions.

The tolerance of other religions by those who are religious is because of FREE WILL. This is the core value in Christianity. Adam and Eve were FREE to choose which path they would follow. All men are FREE to choose, God has gifted us with free will, we can choose evil. If a man has no choice, there is no free will, and there is no decision.
Religious tolerance does not necessitate religion, as it is by definition a secular matter, so your second argument fails. Unacceptable in a secular context, which was what my argument was based on.

THERE SHOULD BE A FREE MARKET OF IDEAS. The best idea will win. We must allow all spiritual ideas to form without restraint. Only in that environment can we truly, honestly choose God or reject Him.

Anything less than a free market of ideas only cheapens our own convictions. If we feel we must DEMAND submission from mankind, then they did not choose. Then we do not have confidence that our idea, our particular religion is the right one.
Other than the fact that this is only relating to a form of religious tolerance for monotheistic religions, it's pretty much assumed that freedom of expression and information is a given in a free society. I certinatly agree with you, but while you certinatly can justify it in religious terms, it's not necessary to put it in as such.
 
What would your opinion (and Muslims in general) be on biotechnology and tweaking the very essence of life?
 
At what age are you expected to grow a beard? Is this ever a problem for men who cannot grow a proper beard? My brother is in his twenties and still cannot grow one :lol:

Hello, Brother. :salute:

You are expected to grow a beard when you can grow one. :) Obviously, you can't grow a beard before your body allows. Naturally, this is around the time of puberty.

As for men who cannot grow beards, then they are excused from this. Many Chinese Muslims and others have a hard time growing facial hair, and you will find that even their top scholars and religious leaders won't have beards, and it is understood that they cannot grow it and so no blame is on them for that. Indeed, it is the shaving of the beard that is deplored.

The general rule in Islam is that you are only held to account for what your own intention was and that which is in your own control; if something is out of your control, then there is no sin on you for that. I remember once that this Zionist girl in college once came upto me and gave me a hug when I wasn't looking or prepared for that. (She was angry at me for my views on certain issues.) After she hugged me, she said: "So now you are going to Hell for hugging a girl, huh?" To that, I slyly responded: "No, but you might be." Of course, I was joking. :D (Since nobody is allowed to say who is and who is not going to Hell.)

This girl was operating under the false idea that I as a Muslim would be punished for a "sin" that was forced upon me, when this is not the case. I know that in many American prisons, they force Muslims to eat pork, thinking that now the Muslim will fear damnation, but in reality, we Muslims all know that there is no sin if you are compelled to do something, or if things are out of your control. For example, the five daily prayers are compulsory and the one who misses them is considered sinful. Of course, if you were in a coma, then you wouldn't be sinful for missing the prayer, since that is out of your control.

Hope that helps. :)

Take care, Brother. :salute:
 
What would your opinion (and Muslims in general) be on biotechnology and tweaking the very essence of life?

Hello, Brother. :salute:

I'm answering your question out of order since it is such an interesting question.

Muslims are generally more accepting and supportive of bio-technology than their Christian brothers. In fact, we believe that the debate about "becoming God" is a bit blasphemous, because we do not think that any human being could *ever* become God. You could try all you want, but you can never be like Allah or create life like He can. Because this is an impossibility, you can try all you want and you will never accomplish it. Therefore, we Muslims do not have any fear that God's Power is being usurped by bio-technology. Instead, we believe that lowly human beings are simply utilizing tools that Allah Himself gave to us and that it is only by His Grace that we get *some* more insight into the complex nature of health and man. If we splice DNA, then who created the DNA other than Allah? Who gave us the power to splice DNA, other than Allah, Who gave us eyes to see and hands to work with, and minds to think? If we split atoms and create new elements, Who is the One Who created those particles in the first place and Who is the One Who allowed us to split them in that way?

Shaikh Muhammad Salih Al-Munajjid says:

"Islam does not place any restrictions on the freedom of scientific research, or place any obstacles in its way, because it is a mean of understanding the laws of Allah in His creation"

Historically, Islam and science have walked hand-in-hand. Unlike our Christian brothers, we found our faith to be very compatible with science, and we believe that the study of the sciences only increases our awareness of Allah's amazing creation, and this allows insight into the Greatness of God.

Generally, when people think about cloning, they automatically think about the Hollywood version in which human beings are cloned in totality so that you have a double walking around. But this is actually not the reality. Genetic engineering involves engineering organs and other such things, and we think that this is a very noble thing to do as it preserves and saves life. And bio-technology can make crops stronger so that more food can be available and this too ends hunger and saves life. In the end, all of these such measures benefits man, and so long as this is the case, then it should be done.

So almost all forms of genetic engineering are allowed. The only thing that would not be allowed would be to mix the haploid cells of a man with a random woman, because this would be--in a very weird way--a form of Zinnah (fornication/adultery). Children should only be the result of legitimate married couples.

But other than this stipulation, Islam and Muslims are generally very lenient towards bio-technology, genetic engineering, organ transplanation, etc. And in fact, we believe that it is a very important field to study.

Take care, Brother. :salute:
 
Let me rephrase my last question: What would your reaction be if your child now an adult became athiest, if you dont have a child lets say you do. Would you take any measures to convince him to be muslim?
 
Would you still love your child all the same and still consider him family if he became athiest?

If you dont have a child lets assume you have one now in the future.

Hello, Brother. :salute:

I am not married, but yes, we can talk hypothetically speaking.

If my child would grow upto become athiest (may Allah save me from such a fate), I would still love him and I would still consider him my son. It is Haram (forbidden) to cut family ties in Islam, regardless of what religion someone is. The Prophet's wife, Saffiyah (ra), was a former Jew who converted to Islam. But she did not cut her family ties with the rest of her family that was not Muslim.

Prophet Noah's son was a disbeliever and yet Prophet Noah (as) did not abandon him, but rather Prophet Noah (as) kept exhorting him to return to the Path of God up until the very end of his son's life. Prophet Muhammad's uncle was Non-Muslim, and yet the Prophet (s) was by his side throughout his life up until his death.

I myself am the type that can never abandon a loved one, no matter how much they hurt me or how bad of a person they are. This has even caused me grief in the past, but it is just a personality trait of mine. Good or bad, I don't know. :(

If my son turned Non-Muslim (Allah protect me from that!), I would no doubt be devestated. I would continually exhort him to return to the Path of Islam.

Take care, Brother. :salute:
 
in the muslim heaven to you really get to have sex with 72 virgins? can you opt out of that package and instead just take one kinky girl?

I have already addressed your question in the previous thread. I shall copy and paste my answer here.

Elrohir said:
I have a question. (It's probably been asked before, knowing this crowd....) Do you really believe that you will have 72 women to have your way with for all eternity after you die? Do you think there will be anything more to heaven - like, say, worshiping God - besides screwing houri?

Excellent question, and I'm glad you asked it.

In fact, there are a multitude of rewards that we are told about in the Quran and the Prophetic Sayings. The 72 virgins promised are but *one* of the many rewards promised. Although there are dozens of verses in the Quran about Paradise and its rewards, only five of them mention the virgins. The rest mention other rewards in Paradise.

Amongst all of these rewards in Paradise, the *greatest* reward in Paradise is to see the Face of Allah, which means to be in the Glory of God's presence and to be in His good pleasure. Allah describes Paradise by saying:

"Allah has promised the men and women of the believers Gardens with rivers flowing under them, remaining in them timelessly, forever, and fine dwellings in the Gardens of Eden. But the greatest bliss is the Good Pleasure of Allah: that is the supreme felicity." (Quran, 9:72)

It is said in the Islamic lore that the Greatest of all rewards is to be in the presence of God in Paradise, and this will make people forget all other rewards...that is how great it will be.

There are many materialistic rewards that are offered to the believers in Paradise, and these are definitely mentioned in the Quran and the Prophetic Sayings. Let us look at one of the Prophetic Sayings in which Allah gives these materialistic rewards to the People of Paradise, and then Allah asks them:

"Are you well pleased now?" They would say: "Why should we not be pleased, O Lord, when You have given us what you have not given to any of your creations?" He (Allah) would, however, say: "May I not give you something even more excellent than that?" And they would say: "O Lord, what thing can be more excellent than this?" And He (Allah) would say: "I shall cause My Pleasure to alight upon you and I shall never be afterwards annoyed with you." (Saheeh Muslim, Book 040, Hadith Number 6787)

The Quran uses materialistic rewards like 72 virgins simply as an encouragement to do good on this earth, and it is the only type of reward that people can understand and relate to.

You have tried to portray the Islamic Paradise as non-spiritual, but this is not the case whatsoever. In one of the descriptions of Paradise, the Prophet (s) said of the People of Paradise: "There would be no dissension amongst them and no enmity in their hearts. Their hearts would be like one heart, glorifying Allah morning and evening." (Saheeh Muslim, Book 040, Hadith Number 6797)

So most of the time would be spent in spiritual bliss and prayer. The carnal rewards mentioned are so that people on this earth can relate to Paradise, and thereby strive for it. A Muslim man is commanded, for example, to lower his gaze and to refrain from looking at women on the street. In fact, if he looks at them (i.e. "checks them out"), it is said that he loses virgins in Paradise as a punishment. So the basic principle is that you are getting rewarded in Paradise for the sacrifices and struggles you had on earth. This is something noble, not something disgusting.

For a life of austerity and struggle, you get rewarded in Paradise. This is only fair. Muslims, like I've said, should not listen to music, mix with the opposite gender, etc etc...these are all very tough things to do, and the encouragement is given with materialistic things in Paradise. Many of the things forbidden to us in this life are promised to us in Paradise (in a sin-less form) if we just give it up here. So the *reason* that Allah promised men these virgins is because men must not womanize in this life. The same is the case with wine: it is forbidden in this life, but it is promised in the next life as a compensation. But the wine of Paradise will have its sin removed from it, and so will the sin from the women be removed.

If we have a woman Muslim here (And I thought we did) what's your take on this? Do you find the idea of your husband spending eternity sleeping with a couple dozen eternally virginal beautiful women at least a little disconcerting? Is the man's wife supposed to try and comete with all those women? Or are there male houri to keep her busy?

First of all, the Prophet (s) said that a believing woman who gets Paradise will be made 7,000 times more beautiful than the Hooris (virgins).

Secondly, the women should not complain at all, because Allah has promised them a great reward in Paradise, so great that they can't possibly be ungrateful. Allah says:

"And whoever does good deeds--whether male or female--and is a believer: these shall enter the Garden (of Paradise), and they shall not be dealt with an iota unjustly." (Quran, 4:194)

"I will not waste the work of a worker among you, whether male or female..." (Quran, 3:195)

"Whoever does good--whether male or female--and is a believer: We will most certainly make him live a happy life, and We will most certainly give them their reward for the best of what they did." (Quran, 16:97)

"Enter the garden, you and your wives; you [all] shall be made happy." (Quran, 43:70)

There are some women who wonder why Allah has promised men these Hoor and not the females. Allah reassures them:

"I have prepared for My righteous slaves (such excellent things) as no eye has ever seen, nor an ear has ever heard nor a human heart can ever think of."
(Saheeh Bukhari, Volumn 009, Book 093, Hadith Number 589)

---------------------

Sexual fulfillment is considered a basic need and necessity. Therefore, it would not be appropriate for Allah to have left out mention of this in the rewards for Paradise. Likewise, other essential needs and necessities--such as food--have been mentioned in the descriptions of Paradise. Luxurious foods await the believers. The basic principle, again, is to eat sparingly on this earth (without gluttony) and get luxurious food in Paradise as a result. The sheer chastity and modesty that Islam commands its believers in regards to sex necessitates that the Muslims be rewarded in this category in the next life, and this is why Allah has promised the believers such rewards.

It should be noted that 72 virgins were promised the martyrs in battle. This was because men were forced to leave their wives behind and risk their lives for the defense of justice. Many of the men did not wish to leave their wives behind and had a difficult time controlling their sexual urge for months. Therefore, this promise was made to them: that their sacrifice would not go unanswered.

The encouragement of 72 hooris (virgins) to the martyrs is a method of encouraging people to Fight in the Cause of God against an evil oppressor and to risk their lives to do it. Again, these are men who leave their wives for months on end, and many of them were not ready for this sexual restraint. Therefore, this encouragement and reassurement was given to them, that they would be rewarded with 72 virgins for their sacrifice.

There is a story in one of the Prophetic Sayings about a very ugly man who finally gets married to a woman, and somehow he managed to get one of the most beautiful girls in the city! Everyone is shocked that such an ugly man got such a pretty girl, and the guy is of course elated when the two are wed. Unfortunately, he is called off to battle right after the wedding, even before the first marriage night. He dies in battle. The people feel pity on him saying "what a shame" since he left behind such a wife, but the Prophet (s) smiles and says that one of the virgins of Paradise is greeting this soldier and this is his reward for his sacrifice.

The reason that the Quran and Prophetic Sayings did not mention women getting male virgins, is because this would contradict the extra level of modesty that is demanded of women in Islam. The Quran and Prophetic Sayings are shy when it comes to women, in this department, as it is not considered appropriate. This may seem strange to people of a Western culture in which these things are openly discussed, but this is not the case for Muslim cultures.

Why 72? Why a finite number? After you have had your way with all the virgins, what do you do for the rest of eternity?

The Arabs did not have a number for infinity. Instead, they used multiples of 7 to denote a very large number. You will find this pattern everywhere. For example, when the Prophet (s) says that a man's wife will be 7,000 times more beautiful than the Hooris, it does not mean a literal multiple of 7,000. Instead, in Arabic Balagha (colloquialism), multiples of seven are always used to denote "a very large number."

Therefore, you will often see numbers like 7, 70, 700, and 7,000 being used, oftentimes for the very same thing. It simply denotes a very large number. And for some odd reason, Arabs throw in random numbers in it, and you will see 71, 72, and other such numbers, all denoting "a very large number."

This is a well-known fact to those who are Arabic speakers. Basically, the Prophet (s) is telling us that you will get a large number of whatever in Paradise.

---------------------

Question:

Very often I hear from non-Muslims negative remarks regarding 72 virgins in paradise for martyrs. Can you teach me a good answer about that issue, or guide me to some article about it.

Answer by Shaykh Gibril F Haddad:

Tell them that the perfection of Islam dictates that it have a motivation for every type of person including those that are not motivated except through sensory reward, which is the common lot whether Christians deny it or not, and that the principle of Paradise as reward for martyrs is also very much present in their doctrine. However, Paradise in Islam also describes a higher level called ridwan i.e. the lavishing of Divine good pleasure, to which we pray that Allah guide us.

---------------------

The Quran says that those who do get into Paradise will be rewarded with blessings that eclipse anything on earth; unlimited food of your choice, riches, and wishes come true. Things considered sinful on Earth such as wine will be allowed, and people will be able to eat and drink all they want and not get full or hungover or sick. People will be reunited with their friends and relatives, we will all be made young again, and there will be no anger or pain. Everyone will be given palaces to live in, and clothing fit for royalty, with luxurious couches and thrones for everyone. There will be rivers of the purest water, milk, wine, and honey, all of which are better than any you will find on earth. Each person will get hundreds or thousands of servants to take care of his every whim. Those who get to the highest part of Paradise, Jannah al-Firdaus, will also be able to be in God's Presence. Therefore, Heaven is a paradise filled with pleasures. Sexual fulfillment is but one small part of this grand scheme of things, and no doubt Paradise would have been incomplete without it. There is, however, much more to Paradise than simply getting virgins.

---------------------

In regards to your question of wether you can choose one girl instead of seventy two, that choice is upto you, as Allah has said that you can have anything you want in Paradise.
 
Hello. :)

I am just wondering how do you view people ouside Islam. (Christians, Jews, etc.) Do you think that people will join or fight for the common good or evil? Do you think we could all live together happily and peacefully despite out differences?

If you went to a public school (ie not church or private) how was it like being a minority? Did people look down upon you or treat you as they didn't know if you were Muslim?

Cheers. :)
 
Hello again!

I have another question. What is the opinion of the orthodoxy regarding the jaziya or jizyah (the tax imposed on non-Muslims in Muslim-ruled lands)? Is it permissible, or is it forbidden? If permitted, then to what percentage of the non-believer's income? If forbidden, why?
 
I'm gonna hit you with political questions this time:

What are your beliefs on jihad? (holy war sense)
How do you view Jihadis?

Do you believe Americans are evil people?
Do you believe the US is an evil nation?
Do you think the United States is at war with Islam?

Do you recognize the State of Israel?
Do you believe zionists are evil people?
Do you believe Israel is an evil nation?
Do you think Israel is at war with Islam?

Do you make a distinction between Jews and Zionists?
Do you believe the holocaust is a myth or a truth?
Do you believe in any sort of "zionist conspiracy?
 
Salah-Al-Din, if you don't accept some parts of the Bible (IE, when Christ says "I and the Father are one") then by what grounds to you accept other parts of the exact same books of the Bible?
 
Many people identify Pope Benedict XVI with Catholic Christianity. Do any branches of Islam have a similar figure of international identity?
 
Back
Top Bottom