Not that I'm aware of.
May be this related to Greek "Kerberos" (Cerberus) or something like that?
According to the Wiktionary entry on ker, it is a shortened form of kerber eventually from kerberos.
Thanks for clearing that up guys.
Not that I'm aware of.
May be this related to Greek "Kerberos" (Cerberus) or something like that?
According to the Wiktionary entry on ker, it is a shortened form of kerber eventually from kerberos.
Kremlin Sees 'No Problem' In Disgraced Customs Head Continuing Service
The Kremlin sees “no problem” in disgraced former customs chief Andrei Belyaninov continuing his career in government service, the RBC news website reported Friday.
Belyaninov resigned Thursday after police raided his home in connection with a smuggling case. The Federal Security Service (FSB) found shoe boxes piled with cash, expensive paintings, luxurious rooms filled with antiques and even an indoor swimming pool.
President Vladimir Putin's spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters Friday that he doesn’t know if Belyaninov will take up another government post, but that “nothing prevents him from doing so.” After submitting his resignation, Belyaninov had expressed a desire to keep working in government.
The raid was part of a criminal investigation into St. Petersburg businessman Dmitry Mikhalchenko, who was arrested on smuggling charges in March. Belyaninov has not been charged in the case and has been classified as a witness.
The raid and resignation came amid a wave of sackings. Putin dismissed four regional governors, four presidential envoys and an ambassador, replacing several of them with officials with a law enforcement background.
https://themoscowtimes.com/news/kre...n-disgraced-official-continuing-service-54795
Not at all.Is a flat cap associated to homosexuals in Russia?
What is going on? Putin invaded. Why? Because he was really upset and butt hurt about the people rising up against his corrupt puppet who was stealong everything not nailed down. Naturally, Putin had to tell lots of lies to try to justify his misdeeds but, fortunately, their were useful idiots whp were willing to swallow his lies.
It says that the model which allowed our economy to grow fast and nearly doubled our GDP in 2000s, is not effective anymore and can maintain only about 1-2% growth a year. We need reforms which would diversify and modernize economy, make management on different levels more effective. There are two development programs being prepared, one of them (which I personally have higher expectations for) is prepared by former finance minister, liberal economist L. Kudrin and his team. There are rumors that he may become a next prime minister, which in my opinion would be a good decision.More importantly, what does the government tell its citizens about it?
A civil war, limited in scale so far. The specific event which triggered the conflict, was probably a Russian decision to take over Crimea - a separatist region, populated mostly by people with pro-Russian stance. It happened after the democratically elected Ukrainian president was forcefully deposed in violation of constitution and Ukraine entered a state of turmoil. The Crimea events inspired pro-Russian population of South-Eastern parts of Ukraine to take action, demanding the people who seized power in Kiev, federalization of the country and giving their region wider autonomy. The central government tried to use force to suppress uprising, which led to a military conflict with already thousands of victims.From your perspective what is going on in Ukraine and what caused it?
You dont seem to be neither Russian nor person with a real insight. Please keep your silly opinions for "Ask a naive person" thread.
Yeah, I am the niave person where as you probably believe there was some secret American coup but are not niave, right?
A civil war, limited in scale so far. The specific event which triggered the conflict, was probably a Russian decision to take over Crimea - a separatist region, populated mostly by people with pro-Russian stance. It happened after the democratically elected Ukrainian president was forcefully deposed in violation of constitution and Ukraine entered a state of turmoil. The Crimea events inspired pro-Russian population of South-Eastern parts of Ukraine to take action, demanding the people who seized power in Kiev, federalization of the country and giving their region wider autonomy. The central government tried to use force to suppress uprising, which led to a military conflict with already thousands of victims.
The main underlying reason why it could happen, in my opinion, is a failure of Ukrainian government to properly integrate national minorities. Desire to build a nation state basing solely on Ukrainian culture and nationalism and failing to account for a multitude of ethnic and culture groups of Ukrainian citizens.
Another reason is that Ukraine had become a battleground in geopolitical rivalry between great powers, where each one of them propped up different fractions and tried to bring them to power.
I can't name the concrete person or organization. All what I know is that they came to power after a wave of mass protests in Kiev, which started as a grassroot movement, but later became much more consolidated organization, properly coordinated and financed, able to successfully resist police forces. Financing of Maidan movement (my guess) most likely came from Ukrainian oligarchs who leaned to pro-nationalist camp and were competing for power against Yanukovich and other Donetsk oligarchs. As anti-Russian movement, they also got significant political, media and probably, also financial support from the US.Who do you believe put the current Ukrainian Government in power?
In Crimea, Russia sent special forces which initially seized a few strategic objects (such as Simpheropol airport). Pro-Russian local activists did the rest of the job, having Russian troops as a coverage. Ukraine had about 20000 troops in the area, but most of them were local people who simply switched sides and joined Russian army and navy. Literally joined, many of them signed new contracts and remain to serve in the same place, but in Russian army. The soldiers who remained loyal to Ukraine were let go.To what extend was the Russian government involved with the pro-Russian rebels?
In Crimea, Russia sent special forces which initially seized a few strategic objects (such as Simpheropol airport). Pro-Russian local activists did the rest of the job, having Russian troops as a coverage. Ukraine had about 20000 troops in the area, but most of them were local people who simply switched sides and joined Russian army and navy. Literally joined, many of them signed new contracts and remain to serve in the same place, but in Russian army. The soldiers who remained loyal to Ukraine were let go.
Nationalists played significant role in overthrowing previous government in Ukraine. They might be not the most numerous group, but certainly one of the most active ones. The problem which has been reported, is that some of their groups are outright Neo-Nazis and they have been incorporated into new government power structures, such as the National Guard. Initially it was reported by Russian media only, and it took about a year for such reports to appear also in Western Media:Early on I saw Russia putting out reports that the Ukrainian Nationalists who overthrew the government were Nazis. Undeniably ethnic tensions are playing a role here and considering the history of the region during WWII a military coup sympathetic, or adhering to that kind of an ideology could be a real possibility especially after people are divided along ethnic and nationalistic lines. Is there any truth, or evidence to support the Russian government's claims, or was this an exaggeration on their part of some elements within the groups of protesters?
Tell that to the Tatars.Crimea was always a part of Russia