Ok, Thank you all for your answers, I'm sorry that i haven't time to write an answer myself for few days.
I was asking about your uprising because for me it always seems like you were religious but at some point you decided to "deconverted" and now you need to justify it for yourself and thus my feeling of you as a band of pricks that need to rub their atheism into evrybody face.
I've always thought that it comes from the fact that majority of posters here is from US and religion is there a major issue, partly thanks to the religious reneval of '70. But the same sentiment is found even between some Europeans it seems and so I would like to ask
SiLL (But any other atheist can answer too): Why do you need to argue about your faith. Why it is an issue?
You know, this whole debate seems silly from here. Why debate about something so unimportant? Religion is a non-issue, majority of people are nonbelivers but only after third or fourth beer they say that it seems stupid to them and nearly no-one give a crap about Dawkins. Saing that, the answer for this:
I recently saw a map for the question "do you believe a God exists" in Europe and the Czech republic scored lowest. Can anyone explain? "Commies did it" can't be all to it, if one looks at Poland.
Is that (as someone pointed out) that when in other nations the church was positive force during the fight for national sovergenity, here the catolic church was an ally of Habsburg empire and athe anticlerical sentiment carried over to czechoslovakia where catholic church for most part was a reactionary force and goverment was more in favor of protestant and hussite faith. And just when they started to accept that the rapublic is a reality that won't easilly go away, the nazis came. The clero-fascist ragime in Slovakia wasn't exactly helpful for the cause of religion and then the communist came and you can surly imagine the rest of the story. Plus the whole thing with hussite wars meant that we sampled thirty-year war one century before the rest of Europe, and losing 1/3 of population due to the civil war and famine kinda sucked. But the impact of recatolization was overestimted by Winner, imho. (Does anybody knows what happened to him?)
And I would like to point out that atheism here have not a form of naturalism and denying the existence of any supernatural force. (France and Lithuania beat us for that). Majority of people here belive that there is "something higher", or in astrology and so on. People here are aganist organized religion, aganist churches and scriptures not aganist possibility of God.
And some other answers:
Ask an atheist:
How do you decide how much charity to give and where to give it? Do you think that charity giving is noble? Should morality which encourages it be developed? What're some of the things which prevent charity giving? Is it okay that it's 'easier' (emotionally) to give to charity close-to-home than far away? Do you think that if you were a believer in a religious faith, you'd give more to charity or 'be nicer'?
1) I'm a student, I don't have much spare liquidity.
2) Noble is a rather loaded word, but it is dafinetly nice.
3) Nope, such morality is good, but if we have to develop something, way to remove the causes for charity would be better.
4) Lack of money, i think?
5) Yes. But I don't see much difference between them.
6) Depends on religion, I can imagine that if it would demand giving charity more, I would give more.
Question for the atheists:
How do you feel about prayer at things like city council meetings? Does it bother you? Would you like to see it restricted?
Have you met disapproval of your beliefs by your family? Community? What's the worst reaction you've faced?
Why would someone do that? I haven't seen anything like that, but i think it would be rather wierd and akward. Why create a law just for few incidents?
Nope. Nope. Nada. (But TBH, its rather impolite to talk about your faith here)
What does it mean for something to be "good"?
To be plaesant/welcomed.