Jeff Sachs style basically?
I don't like him very much, can't you tell?
But isn't he all about micro-projects and building physical capital like you were describing?
What is the ultimate source of information when it comes to how much money the federal government gets and from where every year and where it goes?
And now for the really bad news:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080116/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy;_ylt=AjEi49aSGgcCB4Sy0whQwlSs0NUE
"Consumer prices rose by 4.1 percent for all of 2007, up sharply from a 2.5 percent increase in 2006, the Labor Department said Wednesday."
This means that the FED doesn't have much room to cut the interest rates sadly.
No, he most definitely isn't. At least, that's the impression I got reading his book "The End of Poverty". Heck, the title is a lie! He does speak about micro-projects, but he views them as something a large organization can provide. I don't buy that.
So has bush lost the plot altogether with his plan to spur growth with yet another tax cut? Shouldn't spending be reigned in first before even mentioning another tax cut? Or is this simply political posturing to make the democrats look like bad guys if/when the refuse the bill in the house?
So has bush lost the plot altogether with his plan to spur growth with yet another tax cut? Shouldn't spending be reigned in first before even mentioning another tax cut? Or is this simply political posturing to make the democrats look like bad guys if/when the refuse the bill in the house?
At the center of concern is the growing influence of sovereign wealth funds, which invested $21.5 billion in American companies last year, according to Thomson. Analysts say they could skew markets by investing to improve the fortunes of their national companies or to pursue political goals.
“This is a phenomenon that could be called the growth of state capitalism as opposed to market capitalism,” said Jeffrey E. Garten, a trade expert at the Yale School of Management. “The United States has not ever been on the receiving end of this before.”
Perhaps emblematic of national ambivalence, in an appearance on CNBC last week, the voluble market analyst Jim Cramer spoke in menacing terms about the growing role of state investment funds from the Middle East and China.
“Do we want the communists to own the banks, or the terrorists?” Mr. Cramer asked. “I’ll take any of it, I guess, because we’re so desperate.”
It seems the Fed has cut interest rates by three quarters of a point. Is this as bad as I think it is, or is there something I'm not seeing here?