Bad scientists: you have given bad info on global warming

Status
Not open for further replies.
I predict in 20 years climate change will bring about the age of the shark-people. They will evolve into 20 times their current size and grow laser beams on their heads. Humanity's only chance of survival will be to appease them with voucher's for holidays in exotic locations.

I fear for us all. (except gingers, they can be eaten)
 
Question at everyone: Is the CO2-rise really as steady as this paragraph assumes?

500px-Mauna_Loa_Carbon_Dioxide-en.svg.png


There is only one period, where the red trend line does not increase. That period is around 1974. 1973-74 also saw the first oil crisis when an oil embargo by the OPEC led to an oil shortage and a sharp increase in oil price, which in turn caused many Western nations to take (temporary) measures to reduce oil consumptions. Coincidence?
 
Question at everyone: Is the CO2-rise really as steady as this paragraph assumes?

Naw. Just from a cursory look at Wikpedia:

Carbon_Dioxide_400kyr.png


And in terms of annual output:

800px-Global_Carbon_Emissions.svg.png
 
From Liars Inc, you mean? There is nowhere (aside from the IPCC) where you can find greatest eco-horsecr@p than on the wiki.

:lol:
 
CO2 is also 'not good', because it's a water acidifier.
Yes, it's an acidifier. So tell me, what effect has the recent rise in CO2 had on ocean water? Basic math shows that the answer is zero, to many many decimal places. So why do you bring this nonsense up?

Yes, we're aware of the ocean, thank you very much. There're tons known about its effect/contribution to the issue.
Funny that you said that the only significant variable that you didn't understand was clouds while now you are acknowledging the influence of the oceans. Tell me, in your "scientific" opinion, how much CO2 is there in the oceans compared to the atmosphere? Anything above 2X would basically prove the entire AGW hypothesis to be basically horsesh!t. (Equilibrium again) The figures I have read are in the range of 60X to 2000X.
 
Oh calm down, honey. If the conspiracy is so wide as to include governments across the world as well as the people running Wikipedia, you're probably going to be visited by the black helicopters anyway.
 
True, they're more likely to use black hybrids or black high-speed rail to transport people to the warmist re-education centres.
 
Oh calm down, honey. If the conspiracy is so wide as to include governments across the world as well as the people running Wikipedia, you're probably going to be visited by the black helicopters anyway.
Oh stuff it. This cr@p really gets tiresome. There are gatekeepers everywhere and most of them are amateurs.

BTW, I am not your honey. (thank God for that!)
 
You can't hide black high-speed rail. Someone is going to take pictures and cite them as evidence of some Amerinazi death camp activity, which would offend the Amerinazis. Meanwhile, the water rises.
 
Hey, you can't make a climate change conspiracy omelette without breaking a few civil liberty eggs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom