azzaman333
meh
The only positive about Rock Band:Nickelback would be that it's not Rock Band:Korn
You've got to be kidding me. Nickelback is awful, and the Beatles are the most popular band ever.
No, I'm saying the most popular band ever deserves its own game more than an awful band.
I believe both cases are good ideas. Rock Band is in my opinion a rather decent game, and I can't see how it should disvalue the music, other than possibly take away the glory.1. Was making "The Beatles: Rock Band" a good idea?
2. Was making "Green Day: Rock Band" a good idea?
If they're allowed to, they could make a "Rock Band-Opera" for all I would care.3. Should Harmonix, or any other company, consider making band-specific "Rock Band"s of different bands? If so, which? (This can be because it would be good for Harmonix or simply because you would like to see it happen)
Unless people dislike the band, I think it will only affect their reputation positively.4. How do you think this will affect these bands' reputations, etc., if at all.
IMO only comparatively old (i.e. older than a decade old) and many-albumed bands should be in band-specific Rock Bands. Nickleback has only 6 albums and are barely over a decade old. They are not really "legends" in the same way the Beatles or other such bands are. Plus they're extremely controversial.
Expansion of the band specific Rock Band titles wouldn't be a bad idea, but I sure as hell wouldn't want Huayna Capac deciding the bands!![]()