Beta Testers Needed!

[Afforess]

having a blast with 1.5b2 -- the speedup is DEFINITELY noticeable!

Any thoughts on 1.5b3 eta? (thinking if I should start a new game or wait...)

When all the bugs get worked, I'll release the next one.

I'm doing better at keeping the OP up to date, so check it. When it gets down to 1 or 2 bugs, start planning...

 

[winthrowe]

observatory requirement seems broken. I have hills, or peaks in my BFC, but the observatory is still unbuildable. have glass if that matters.

 

[dudeSDCA]

When all the bugs get worked, I'll release the next one.

I'm doing better at keeping the OP up to date, so check it. When it gets down to 1 or 2 bugs, start planning...

Awesome, thanks! And keep up the good job!

 

[Afforess]

observatory requirement seems broken. I have hills, or peaks in my BFC, but the observatory is still unbuildable. have glass if that matters.

I'll double check that, I was fairly sure I did that one right.

 

[os79]

No, it's intended: if you beat a stack which has several siege units in it you may end up getting several of them as a prize. It's part of main RoM 2.8.

OK, if that is so, then great.

But the problem is that I have China as my civ. When I capture the enemy's siege weapons, I don't get their UU. I got them covverted into my UU, Ancient Cannon. Only later when I can train Trebuchats, would I capture the usual siege weapons.

Otherwise, cool feature and thanks Zappara!

 

[JosEPh_II]

Of the save I gave last night I don't know if the CTD was reproducible.

But the screenies with all the Error msgs I thought were important. Especially as they pointed to a specific process.

Afforess, did they help?

JosEPh

 

[Afforess]

Of the save I gave last night I don't know if the CTD was reproducible.

But the screenies with all the Error msgs I thought were important. Especially as they pointed to a specific process.

Afforess, did they help?

JosEPh

Kinda. I found one python error, but the problem is that RevDCM 2.61 has those python event handler messages too, so the error lies somewhere in their, and not in my changes.

However, the Trade Util warnings are my fault. I do need to fix those...

 

[nour3001]

Got an error message similar to joseph II error message,but regarding barbarianciv instead of revolution,it started to appear occasinally but now it appears every turn, and no barbarian civs appeared till now.

 

[Afforess]

observatory requirement seems broken. I have hills, or peaks in my BFC, but the observatory is still unbuildable. have glass if that matters.

Yes, this seems to be a bug. My logic must be broken. I'm going to recheck it now.

 

[Afforess]

Got an error message similar to joseph II error message,but regarding barbarianciv instead of revolution,it started to appear occasinally but now it appears every turn, and no barbarian civs appeared till now.

Can you post your pythonerr.log file?

 

[nour3001]

Can you post your pythonerr.log file?

here it's

 

[Afforess]

here it's

Awesome! I found where that bug was. Pretty silly mistake.

 

[Afforess]

observatory requirement seems broken. I have hills, or peaks in my BFC, but the observatory is still unbuildable. have glass if that matters.

I Fixed this, but it was a Faustian bargain, let me tell you.

The reason this is is because the game considers Peaks and Hills as "altitudes" not "terrains". So, while there are terrain for Peaks and Hills, they are never used.

To fix this, I had to basically HARDCODE (Hardcoding is what caused the RoM slowdowns in the first place, albiet, I used the SDK, which doesn't cause a slowdown. But it's still a no-no.) peaks and hills into the logic. So, if anyone changes the order of the terrain in the terrain xml files, they will be surprised when they can buildings they shouldn't be able to.

 

[DRJ]

I have a question about the production loss of buildings if they aren't continued after a couple of turns: it seems broken, the hammers don't get lost.

I have 2 screenies to prove this:
first one shows turn 160,

Spoiler :

secound one is turn 161

Spoiler :

.

The third screenie is merely just for fun, to show the amazing game setup RoM 2.8 + A New Dawn beta allow...

Spoiler :

 

[Afforess]

I have a question about the production loss of buildings if they aren't continued after a couple of turns: it seems broken, the hammers don't get lost.

I have 2 screenies to prove this:
first one shows turn 160,

Spoiler :

secound one is turn 161

Spoiler :

.

The third screenie is merely just for fun, to show the amazing game setup RoM 2.8 + A New Dawn beta allow...

Spoiler :

That's an interesting bug. Not exactly high priority, but I'll see if I can't figure out the culprit.

 

[Blackflag421]

Right now Tokugawa is cautious with me, we have embassies, and he will sign open borders but not right of passage - WAI?

 

[NBAfan]

Right now Tokugawa is cautious with me, we have embassies, and he will sign open borders but not right of passage - WAI?

Wait, did you just say Tokugawa will sign open borders at cautious?

 

[Blackflag421]

Yeah... but not right of passage. Seems backwards to me.

 

[Afforess]

Right now Tokugawa is cautious with me, we have embassies, and he will sign open borders but not right of passage - WAI?

Wait, did you just say Tokugawa will sign open borders at cautious?

Yeah... but not right of passage. Seems backwards to me.

Is he by chance, in a mutual war, or a vassal?

 

[Blackflag421]

Mutual military struggle +5

We've been at war with the 1 city persians for centuries, I still have no idea where the persians are