I didn't read all the comments, but why is Barrack Obama leader of America? That should be changed. I see no reason at all to put him in the game. He has utterly destroyed our nation of America. Why is he our leader?
Now, I see you have Hitler. That is a different issue, and I have mixed feelings about it. I am not claiming Obama is worse than Hitler, but Hitler accomplished a lot, just negative. Obama has accomplished what? There are four types of leaders:
Leaders which accomplished a lot that was positive and morally ehtical (Washington, Lincoln, Churchill, exc.)
Leaders that accomplished a lot for his own nation, but did evil to other civs for it (Napolean, Montezuma exc.)
Leaders that made their civilizations productive, and had success, but were brutal dictators (Hitler, Stalin.)
Leaders that didn't really accomplish anything, or everything they did accomplish was negative/trivial (FDR, Obama.)
Now, yes, Obama allows murder in this country, but many president's have allowed that, and despite that America have killed 8 times as many as Hitler, for some reason, we don't really think of them that way, and besides, they don't realize they're doing it.
That's why I do not classify Obama with Hitler.
Obama is not conquering other nations in the name of America or anything like that. Therefore I do not classify Obama with Napolean.
And anyone who thinks Obama should be identified alongside Washington or Lincoln is a joke.
Therefore, I think that a different American leader there should be. I haven't played your mod. But I don't have to to know Obama is an unsuitable choice for the American leader. Good call on Regan though.
Why is George W Leader of Texas? Why is there a Texas nation?
As for Hitler, I don't think its an issue. There does need to be some brutal dictators in the third category above. It may make some people offened though, particuarly if they suffered under the man.
Just sayin'
PS: When I put FDR in the negative category, I was specifically referring to the Socialistic "New Deal," programs and such. I was not referencing the war, a stage in which FDR did in fact, show tremendous leadership. Because of his role in the war, FDR probably does deserve a spot, but he was not truly a good president as believed by many.