bigger avatars

[Ansar]

I know its random, but I think the mods have 100 x 100 avatars(?), so shouldnt we be able to have 90 x 90? It doesent sound like much, and I doubt it would slow down the website, but I put a poll with size options, so vote now!

 

[BCLG100]

im cool with it the way it is.

 

[lost_civantares]

What it is now is good, enough to be able to instantly know who the poster is, while still being able to have a little of our own personality in our posts.

 

[Raisin Bran]

I say stay at 90 x 90

Bigger dosen't work well with transparancy at low resolution

 

[Perfection]

Current avatars are bigger then they should be 64x64 is more than enough.

 

[Birdjaguar]

I'm up for 90 x 90

 

[Perfection]

Stop avatar creep! It's always "just a little more" "just a little more". We need a hardlined no!

 

[Kan' Sharuminar]

Current size is nice and dandy.

 

[Heretic_Cata]

I like 'em bigger.

 

[nonconformist]

1024*1024!

 

[Mirc]

100x100...

 

[Thunderfall]

1024*1024!

Some forums actually have no size limit/checking for avatars. In the Official UbiSoft forum, for example, I've seen people with 1024x768 size avatar. The forum just downloads the whole image file and then resizes it to avatar size. Pretty stupid.

 

[Zarn]

I think 70x70 works fairly well. Lets keep the focus on good posting and away from large avatars and sigs.

 

[Turner]

Larger and/or animated avatars are distracting....

 

[RegentMan]

My longbow doesn't need more than 70 x 70.

 

[Perfection]

My longbow doesn't need more than 70 x 70.

Actually, it does.

 

[BCLG100]

Also your longbow looks pretty crappy on the black skin.

 

[RegentMan]

Also your longbow looks pretty crappy on the black skin.

But it looks fantastic on the dark blue choice, and since that's the best one, that's all that matters.

 

[Raisin Bran]

all avatars work well in the mac OS X

 

[Ansar]

Larger and/or animated avatars are distracting....

Dont you have a bigger avatar...?