Bigotry towards white males

[Bamspeedy]

Wow, that took a while...

I'm not so sure. I don't think he's saying the woman is more sensitive.

Man gets threats, women gets threats, Person C (neither one of the victims, such as say a reporter or news editor) may be more likely to be in an uproar over the woman getting the threats than the man getting the threats.

But if he indeed mean that the women are more sensitive then you have a point.

 

[Evie]

Actually, everything is exactly about getting into other people's pants, for either sex, or wallet. Those who tell otherwise are either failing in that activity, or try to be manipulative and hide their motives. And those who sincerely think the world is otherwise are being fooled and used more easily.

Like I said. Grow up.

 

[Ryika]

To make my point more explicitly - Is it truly neutral and unbiased to favour the null hypothesis re: sexism in societies in which there has been significant cultural and even legislative discrimination in the lifetimes of living women?

Because you're making an poorly examined assumption that western societies have become non-sexist at some point in time, which should be a testable claim tbh. And should come first.

That's not my stance at all.

I do assume there is still sexism, I assume there will always be sexism. My stance is that you can't measure how much sexism there is just by asking people for their opinion. You do it by testing for discrimination.

 

[Akka]

I can cite the evidence that I used to do that to my wife until she told me I was an ass and I made a conscious effort to stop doing it.

And obviously, it happened because you were a white male and not just because you were an idiot ?

You are a human being. You make mistakes the same as every last one of us. It's very likely your mistakes are colored by the culture that surround you, because mistakes usually ARE colored by that kind of preconceptions.

Or would you have us believe you're perfect?

You're literally saying "you're human, so imperfect", which is true but universal and applying to everyone, and somehow using it as an argument about how it means it's specific to white men.
Wut ?


I can see a pattern here, where things that are either universal or personal somehow ends up being "proofs" of "white man" being singled out. Go figure.

 

[Aleksey_aka_al]

Like I said. Grow up.

Cutting one's testicles off or hiding them under female underwear is not growing up in any sense and it is directly related to sex, pants, sexual pleasure or absence of it, intercourse, masturbation and all the other fun things. Moreover, it is fundamentally sexist. And anyone who's denying changing gender is directly related to sex is a hypocrite.

 

[Evie]

So Aleksey, seeing as I've seen you stand up for Putin's degenerate views and actions so many times...

You do it for Putin's money, or Putin's pants?

 

[Aleksey_aka_al]

I have my own opinion and I don't need a Putin for that, m'kay?

You can hide your penis under a skirt, but you cannot hide the fact that transgender is a sexual/pants thing and that you are copycating Mr. Garrison.

 

[Evie]

Yet, you keep white knighting Comrade Vladimir.

And that, here, is the problem. There's no difference between you stepping up and defending Putin (because you think criticisms leveled at him are unfounded and unfair) ; and Onejayhawk stepping up and defending Trump (for the same reason), and me stepping up and defending Valka. We all do it because we genuinely believe the criticism are unfounded and unfair, or because we agree with what Putin/Trump/Valka is saying.

It doesn't magically become about "getting into someone's pants" because you stand up for a woman, or women, instead of a man.

Really, the idea that a white male cannot stand up for a woman or women without sexual motives is a form of bigotry toward white male.

Strange, how the people who whine the most about bigotry toward white males are the quickest to trot out the "White Knighting" idea.

 

[Timsup2nothin]

Actually, everything is exactly about getting into other people's pants, for either sex, or wallet. Those who tell otherwise are either failing in that activity, or try to be manipulative and hide their motives.

I have my own opinion and I don't need a Putin for that, m'kay?

I find it really surprising how easily you were maneuvered into this contradiction.

 

[Aleksey_aka_al]

This is not about Putin, this is about someone's stupid comment. As if there's not enough hypocrisy and prejudice against sex in natural female population, as if there's not enough straight male apologists of that stance, there are now virtual wannabe female posers from among males, who copycat the same song about having penis and healthy libido is wrong and criminal.

And even that is not enough. These wannabe female male posers are also obsessed with Putin and his masculinity.

Moderator Action: This post along with your two previous replies have crossed the line from questioning the legitimacy of being transgender to personally attacking another member for what they've recently shared with the community. You know better than this. Three point infraction. - Vincour
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[Synobun]

Moderator Action: This thread has consistently taken bad turns. Closed for review and infractions given where applicable.