Should my cries for a truce be ignored, I am of course open to compromises suggested by any party that might end conflict in Italy.
To Charles, Most Christian King of France, and Philip, Archduke of Austria, and to both claimants to the Duchy of Milan
From Agostino Barbarigo, Doge of Venice
We address your excellent persons with confidence, sires, that you will see the sense in our words and, inspired by your own virtuous personalities, agree to come to a compromise on behalf of your rival Dukes of Milan. For peace is the higher virtue in this case. Venice is not content to see fighting continue in Northern Italy; we have proposed a truce already, but noble Charles, you seem unwilling to accept this.
Therefore, why should either of you not compromise on this issue? Surely wealth can be found adequate to compensate both claimants for the loss of half of their territory, if this were necessary? But on the contrary, it is not, for you are reasonable and peaceable men, and so we suggest that, perhaps, Francesco Sforza might be content with setting up court at Pavia, or, indeed, at Parma or at Piacenza or any one of the many towns of the Milanese, with ample territory amounting to a substantial part of the Duchy, while Maximilian Sforza might be content with the rest of the Milanese, with a court at Milan itself? Does this not satisfy both sons? After all, remember that primogeniture is not a firmly set and established rule; many a land has been partitioned successfully and profitably for both sons. Therefore, we urge you to consider this proposal carefully as one that allows for both dynastic and strategic interests in the region.