El Caballerion
King
Even though I would love THE SEMINOLES as a good marsh-based strategic civ, I doubt its inclusion for this reason.... how they will make it different from INDONESIA'S leader screen since that leader is portrayed in a marsh?
They are the exact same colour, it is the same cream for the cities as it is on the flag. It looks as though they directly used the flags colours as the Civs colours. Can you think of any other explanation for colours being that identical?
You can disagree if you want, but it seems mighty silly now that they've given us an image of a Civ with colours taken from Venice's flag.
No. That is all I have to say about that, there are more than a dozen more important Native American civs than the Cherokee. Only reason they were being considered was they were North American, people like to claim "Cherokee Heritage", and somewhat recognizable to an east coast audience [also speculation about the Civil War Scenario]
No. That is all I have to say about that, there are more than a dozen more important Native American civs than the Cherokee. Only reason they were being considered was they were North American, people like to claim "Cherokee Heritage", and somewhat recognizable to an east coast audience [also speculation about the Civil War Scenario]
Oh not saying they couldn't be an interesting civ and fun to play as, just the statement that the Cherokee are more deserving than any other Native American civ is wrong
You mean the purple found on some weird small secondary circley things? Yeah sure they would put those things on Venice's symbol instead of the giant golden winged lion![]()
Hell no. The Cherokee's survival through everything, their ablility to adapt and modernise, their sophisticated political structure and development in the 19th century means that though they may not be the most important, they certainly did some pretty impressive things, given their situation. They were the only people to ever develop an alphabet from scratch since the dawn of time, for goodness' sake. New Echota/Tahlequah should be a CS, at the very least.
Well, so I missed the birth of the Purple Theory...
I'd say that Venice WAS anyway almost a given after the 2 civs revealed today...
BTW, we should be thinking of something... There is a likelihood that one of the next civs be specially diplomacy-centered in order to take a good advantage of the World Congress... It could be Venice, for city-states... But they could also focus on Great Works... has anyone thought if the Tupi are a possibility? They had the Tamoyo Confederation, so they could be rather diplomacy oriented...
As it seems as the purple matches is an exact fit, Venice now has an extremely high chance. The only thing I don't understand is if Venice is in, then why isn't it representing Italy in the scenario?
Because purple/gold, red/gold and blue/gold are already taken by Rome, Persia and Sweden respectively. Nothing is saying that they are going to replace the winged lion as SYMBOL.
You could argue the same way as to why they would pick pink on red for Spain's Asturian cross which is usually depicted as gold on blue, or why they would pick dark green on light green for Brazil, none of which are the colors featured on the Brazilian flag, or why they would go with the grey/grey combination for Germany, which hasn't really anything to do with any of the German symbols.
So far, there's no civ color combination that looks identical. It's very likely that they are going to use the winged lion as the symbol itself, but since the most common color combination of the Venetian flag (golden lion on red) is already taken, and the less common version with golden lion on blue is as well, they had to settle with another combination.
As it seems as the purple matches is an exact fit, Venice now has an extremely high chance. The only thing I don't understand is if Venice is in, then why isn't it representing Italy in the scenario?
Because this:
![]()
The only thing Venice would represent for Italy is the city of Venice itself.
Because having a Venetian lion in the achievement icon representing Italy seems odd, while a Roman laurel is a more generic icon and could even be interpreted as the olive and oak branches on the modern Republic's emblem.
The differences in tone were very significant, we have two different names for those blues in Thai you know, it's that different!Blue and yellow was taken by France when they made Sweden, that didn't stop them when they chose to find other tones. And that wouldn't stop them finding some other yellow for Venice.
Blue and yellow was taken by France when they made Sweden, that didn't stop them when they chose to find other tones. And that wouldn't stop them finding some other yellow for Venice.