If anyone could post screenshots of the Charlemagne scenario - specifically any new leaders in it - I'd be most grateful
.

Told ya'...But none of the flags, units, warlords civs, espionage, or pretty much anything else worked well...He'll do that when you give him an offer he doesn't like, much like Catherine slapping you. I think he grabs you by the throat and pulls you towards him. It's pretty cool.
Yep, except Charlemagne. He's animated.
I rather like the "ignore terrain movement costs" ability over the free Mobility because the former guarentees you 2 movement points whereas the latter doesn't. That guarentee goes a long way for me.
If the Samurai can get Drill I (and the Drill promotion line) on top of the current 2 First Strikes (making it as effective as Cho-Ku-Nu's except Samurai can get City Raider aswell!), then I'd go for at least giving the Keshik an additional First Strike plus an immunity to first strikes. Or a much (much) higher withdrawl rate.
Definitely agree with the Ger giving +5xp. I am still perplexed as to why that was never done as it would give better synergy for their mounted units (3 promos). Currently, Washington has better mounted units than the Mongols. Go figure!
Not at all. It also means that Lincoln will be more favorably-disposed to civs running Emancipation -- just means that in the end game, Lincoln will have a relationship bonus with a lot of civs if they all run Emancipation -- perhaps making him a little less likely to war? It will have an impact on Lincoln's diplomacy, regardless.
Yep, except Charlemagne. He's animated.
If it were put to a vote, I would prefer that the Ger increase the number of XP's it grants to the Mongols & keep the Aggressive trait. Personally, I prefer the flexibility of 'specializing' troops out of the gate (with Shock, Medic, Woodsmen, etc.) and could see twice-promoted mêlée combined with thrice-promoted Keshiks. Make for a fearsome army.What do you think about changing their Aggressive to Charismatic?
Like this: Genghis Khan (Chm/Imp), Cyrus (Chm/Exp), Washington (Org/Phi), Frederick (Exp/Org), Mehmed II (Agg/Exp), Shaka (Agg/Imp), Kublai Khan (Chm/Cre).
It would also make triple moves possible! Faster than Mech Infantry & almost as fast as Gunships. I know they slept in their saddles while they rode but that seems almost too much coverage.I forgot there's 3 cost terrain too. What about 3mov + Mobility? Wouldn't that guarantee 2 movement also?
Yeah, probably. I skimmed through the leaders, avoiding the ones I knew. I did click on Charlemagne though, which is why I knew he's animated. By that logic, Justinian would also be animated too.Isn't Justinian animated too?
Geesh, 7-10fs! That's a little much isn't it?What do you think about changing their Aggressive to Charismatic?
Like this: Genghis Khan (Chm/Imp), Cyrus (Chm/Exp), Washington (Org/Phi), Frederick (Exp/Org), Mehmed II (Agg/Exp), Shaka (Agg/Imp), Kublai Khan (Chm/Cre).
A point that I haven't seen yet, is that the Samurai can now get the greatesh bunch of first strikes, because Drill IV + Woodsman III gives it total of 7-10fs.
No moreso than what Charismatic already does! All giving the Ger +5xp does is it puts their units on an equal footing with Charismatic leaders (well, until the Charismatic leaders start accumulating xp anyway). Right now, Mongol mounted units are weaker... than Washingtons!If it were put to a vote, I would prefer that the Ger increase the number of XP's it grants to the Mongols & keep the Aggressive trait. Personally, I prefer the flexibility of 'specializing' troops out of the gate (with Shock, Medic, Woodsmen, etc.) and could see twice-promoted mêlée combined with thrice-promoted Keshiks. Make for a fearsome army.
Of course, combined with one Military Instructor, Theocracy &/or Vassalage you would have potentially OP Elephants, Knights, Cuirassier & Cavalry. They might outstrip some of the other Mounted UU in the following eras. Hmm... both changes seem to indicate to me that the Keshik unit itself needs changing.![]()
I think ignoring first strikes and having an additional FS is a good start. Afterall, they were trained archers from near-birth. Maybe even allow it to use defensive promotions & terrain like the Conquistador?
The Barracks says that it gets +2 happiness from Nationhood. Nationhood says that it gives +2 happiness for each Barracks. Does that mean that Barracks now gives +4 happiness when in Nationhood?
The Barracks says that it gets +2 happiness from Nationhood. Nationhood says that it gives +2 happiness for each Barracks. Does that mean that Barracks now gives +4 happiness when in Nationhood?
If it were put to a vote, I would prefer that the Ger increase the number of XP's it grants to the Mongols & keep the Aggressive trait. Personally, I prefer the flexibility of 'specializing' troops out of the gate (with Shock, Medic, Woodsmen, etc.) and could see twice-promoted mêlée combined with thrice-promoted Keshiks. Make for a fearsome army.
Another idea is maybe to have the Ger increase the production speed of Mounted Units? For every 4 'normal' units from other civs the Mongols could build 5 with the same conditions? This would lean more to the 'horde' aspect of their conquests.
It would also make triple moves possible! Faster than Mech Infantry & almost as fast as Gunships. I know they slept in their saddles while they rode but that seems almost too much coverage.Plus it would carry through upgrades!
I think ignoring first strikes and having an additional FS is a good start. Afterall, they were trained archers from near-birth. Maybe even allow it to use defensive promotions & terrain like the Conquistador?
I too would stick with Aggressive. Charismatic isn't out of the question, but the way they have the trait combos setup, it'll throw the balance right out. Agg/Imp isn't appropriate for Shaka either. I'd also go with Chm/Cre for Cyrus. (the whole trait system has lost its integrity imo, for when it comes to defining the leaders 'traits', ie, Aggressive means 'good melee and gunpowder units', not 'good at being aggressive with mounted units'. But that's a whole other topic...)