Actually, thinking about Poland it might be the next region to fall to this timelines modernised equivalent of liberal nationalism (the kind embodied by Drekler, Italy, etc.). The nationalists been abandoned by the Catholic Church, and, as EQ said, Traditional Proletarism has been given a pretty nasty whack by the failure of the Hungarian Civil War (and, presumably, the Copenhagen Uprising, where Proletarists rose up against the most liberal monarch imaginable.
).
On top of that, they are struggling under the burden of the a hegemon that is basically an enlightened despot straight out of the 18th Century. I can see the Poles turning to something thats basically the anti-Russia in a lot of ways, as a general rejection of autocracy coming from Russia. Liberal Nationalism is still very much a thing in this TL, though it doesn't get mentioned much in comparison to moralism and Proletarism, and it still ought to be pretty prevalent in Europe - remember, Germany under Dreklerism destroyed France and is still running the pieces, and unless there's been a significant paradigm shift it is still a liberal nationalist state.
As such, with the remaining Polish independence movement rejecting Moralism and the Pope and Proletarism not being a strong force in Russia (since unions are banned), I can see Poland turning towards radical liberalism in an effort to win independence.
@EQ: so what would a Mathusian proletarist state look like? Would it be very similar to OTL's industrialised state-planned economies like the USSR or Poland?
EDIT: Actually, lets make some more inferences about culture in Europe. Specifically, lets talk about two things - food and immigration.
As you may recall, for a good 50-odd years the most populated parts of China were carved up among the European powers. The FBC, Netherlands, Denmark, Scandinavia, Spain, and Britain all held significant chunks of Chinese territory.
Now, lets also talk about immigration. Historically, during this period there was a huge outward immigration from China. This was due to many factors - overcrowding, famine, and poverty in China, and the relative prosperity of the West and marketing about the various "Get Rich Quick" schemes present there (see: the Gold Rush, Pearl Diving, etc.) Similarly, there was a really large movement of Indians from the Subcontinent during this period - there were 70,000 South Asians in the British isles in 1900. A lot of these Indians ended up in the Caribbean as indentured labourers, while the Chinese migrants mostly went to the New World - Canada, America,
Now, lets go back to Capto's timeline. In this timeline, large sections of China were conquered by the Europeans. However, all of the demographic factors that led to immigration from China are present - possibly compounded by the fact that they are under the thumb of colonial governments who don't really care what happens to the Chinese. What does this mean? That rather than all travelling to the New World as many Chinese did OTL, they would do what the various Indians did and immigrate within the empires. There are probably tens of thousands of people of Chinese descent in London, Madrid, and Cadiz, and probably similar (if smaller) Chinese populations in Copenhagen, Stockholm, Bergen, and Amsterdam. All of these cities would likely have thriving Chinatowns similar to San Francisco's or Sydney's. Chinese restaurants and cafes might be more common in Europe in this period, and the world might have discovered noodles earlier. China's educated elite of the early 1900s would have likely been educated in Europe as well, and brought that back to the country when they returned. Perhaps the leaders of the Red Army are the protegees of those who studied in Europe and America 40 years before.
On top of that, just like how there were many Indians travelling to the British colonies as indentured labourers or on Get Rich Quick schemes, there might be more Chinese across the world as well. Australia would likely have a similar Chinese population from the Gold Rushes and pearl diving as OTL, while America's might be slightly less. Vinland's Pacific coast, however, might have Chinatowns of its own. Oranjien is sitting right on a whole bunch of diamond mines, which is why its a settler colony - its likely that quite a few of the early settlers were Chinese people from the Danish colonies who moved there in pursuit of diamonds and stayed. Brazil, being the land of the free and having its own great wealth and expanse of land needing settlement, would also have a large Chinese population, and the former Spanish Caribbean would have large populations of indentured labourers from China who ended up there and stayed.
