Civ7 now includes Denuvo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well on the contrary in my opinion a game with an IP like that of Marvel should have had more charm than Xcom, in short my father knows who Spider-Man, Iron Men, Hulk etc. are... but if you tell him Xcom at most he thinks whether it's a new cell phone

But for gamers, X-COM is the larger franchise, by far, and games made out from outside franchise are not really known to be the best.
 
But for gamers, X-COM is the larger franchise, by far, and games made out from outside franchise are not really known to be the best.
And beyond that there are plenty of key gameplay differences.

I love XCOM but wasn’t interested in Marvel Suns whatsoever.
 
But for gamers, X-COM is the larger franchise, by far, and games made out from outside franchise are not really known to be the best.

For gamers of a certain category yes (lovers of turn-based games), but the world certainly doesn't end with them and everyone knows who Marvel is (movies, comics, toys etc...) Xcom regardless of the turn-based niche -base game who knows them? after all, if Firaxis paid some money (and not even a little in my opinion given the IP it would have used) to use the various Spider-men, Iron Man, Wolverine it did so to produce numbers similar (if not higher) to Xcom and instead the numbers that he obtained are decidedly inferior
 
And beyond that there are plenty of key gameplay differences.

I love XCOM but wasn’t interested in Marvel Suns whatsoever.

It's your thought, but I doubt that it was the thought of Firaxis when they paid money (and it certainly wasn't even a little) to buy the right to use the name of the various Wolverines, Spider-Man etc., otherwise they would have invented fake superhero names

It's like Firaxis is trying their hardest to get me to not buy this game

Unfortunately they succeeded with me, never mind, I'll get over it like Ubisoft did with the HOMM series
 
Last edited:
For gamers of a certain category yes (lovers of turn-based games), but the world certainly doesn't end with them and everyone knows who Marvel is (movies, comics, toys etc...) Xcom regardless of the turn-based niche -base game who knows them? after all, if Firaxis paid some money (and not even a little in my opinion given the IP it would have used) to use the various Spider-men, Iron Man, Wolverine it did so to produce numbers similar (if not higher) to Xcom and instead the numbers that he obtained are decidedly inferior
So did your father bought Midnight Sun in the end ?
 
So did your father bought Midnight Sun in the end ?

No, because my father is not interested in video games, but if he would have been interested he would most likely have thought about it, I actually gave my father's example to make it clear that Marvel's IP should be more appealing for everyone even outside of turn-based strategy enthusiasts (and this was Firaxis' hope and in any case we can say that Denuvo did not increase sales)
 
This discussion is widely irrelevant. Unless someone can prove that Midnight Suns would have got as many sales as X-Com if not for the presence of Denuvo, none of this matters. Talking about the popularity of one IP does not constitute proof. Talking about similarity in game genres, or mechanics, or shared staff does not constitute proof. Those barely even walk towards that goal. The only thing all of this shows is that they're different games, and hence that attributing their differences in sales to any single factor is impossible. Obviously.

I can tell you that if it hadn't been for Denuvo I would have bought the game, then we can talk for 10,000 hours about this, but I have shown you that Midnigh Suns' numbers are very low, in your opinion it is more likely a Xcom 3 or Midnight Sun 2?
 
I can tell you that if it hadn't been for Denuvo I would have bought the game, then we can talk for 10,000 hours about this, but I have shown you that Midnigh Suns' numbers are very low, in your opinion it is more likely a Xcom 3 or Midnight Sun 2?

And everyone (Including those in the "remove Denuvo" group) are telling you this is not a good example, you've shown nothing except maybe that your hate of the civ-switching design is blinding you.
 
And everyone (Including those in the "remove Denuvo" group) are telling you this is not a good example, you've shown nothing except maybe that your hate of the civ-switching design is blinding you.

Think what you want I said what I think, the only thing, that is a fact that games without Denuvo (Xcom 1 and 2 and Chimera Squad) did better numbers than a game with (Denuvo) so Denuvo did not increase sales

(then who would this anti-Denuvo group be?)

Yes, and for reasons explained many times already, this is completely irrelevant unless you can prove how much Midnight Sun sales were impacted by Denuvo.


And, by the way, this is all coming from someone who really dislikes Denuvo and would like a boycott to reverse its use in Civilization 7. I'd like what you say to be true, because it would make this more likely to happen. But I don't let that bias blind me to elementary statistics.

Then you prove to me that Denuvo increases sales
 
But I don't let that bias blind me to elementary statistics.

Then basic statistics don't seem like the player base to me or are you trying to make me believe that all-time peak of players is a useless statistic for understanding the success of a title? so a game that had a maximum peak of 15,500 compared to one that had a maximum peak of 133,022? in your opinion not indicative of sales success?
 
Civilization VI sold better than V. Prove that more Is increase sales. However, there clearly can be too many Is, as civ VI also outsold II and III. Hence, civ VII has to be failure, as it has too many Is. We don‘t look at civ I because it had no I after the name at all. Civ IV is an exception: it didn‘t sell as well as VI besides the same amount of Is, but it‘s a favorite, thus we can transform the player base‘s love into sales so that it matches civ VI. The next successful civ will be IX.

Whether civ VII has Denuvo or not is irrelevant for its success, because it has the wrong amount of Is.
 
Last edited:
Then basic statistics don't seem like the player base to me or are you trying to make me believe that all-time peak of players is a useless statistic for understanding the success of a title? so a game that had a maximum peak of 15,500 compared to one that had a maximum peak of 133,022? in your opinion not indicative of sales success?
no, it's not about that, please read again the arguments in the thread, and believe me, I'd love to be able to prove your point.
 
You agree with me on the first statement, is that true?
On the second no, okay you think it increases them, I don't, because I think they are other more important factors than placing a DRM, but it's okay, I'll stick to my opinion, you'll stick to yours

I was unclear. The statistics I was talking about wasn't some number or data point. I meant the logic by which we can draw inferences from such data.

I have no reason to believe your data is incorrect. But the inferences you are drawing from that data shows, at best, a wild disregard for that logic.

It's not clear to you, but to me it's very clear or do you think that whoever bought the game keeps it in the Steam library without playing it?

no, it's not about that, please read again the arguments in the thread, and believe me, I'd love to be able to prove your point.

Well you know since we were talking about Denuvo, we had a discussion about Denuvo otherwise in the end the whole discussion boils down to "Civ 7 has denuvo" and just one post is enough
 
On the second no, okay you think it increases them

no, it's just irrelevant, there are too many parameters.

can you prove how many players civ4 has lost because of 3D graphics ?
can you prove how many players civ5 has lost because of 1UPT ?
can you prove how many players civ6 has lost because of "cartoon graphics" ?
can you prove how many players civ7 will lose because of Civ switching, and how many because of Denuvo ?
 
no, it's just irrelevant, there are too many parameters.

can you prove how many players civ4 has lost because of 3D graphics ?
can you prove how many players civ5 has lost because of 1UPT ?
can you prove how many players civ6 has lost because of "cartoon graphics" ?
can you prove how many players civ7 will lose because of Civ switching, and how many because of Denuvo ?

OK, it has a lot to do with the topic (we're talking about Denuvo)
Let's do this, I'll tell you what I would do:
If the announced features (which I didn't really like) wouldn't have made me buy the game at 90% with the inclusion of Denuvo this percentage rises to 150% obviously that's just what I'll do, then I understand that others don't think like me But that's fine, everyone is free to do as they want
For the rest I abandon the topic since in the end there isn't much else to say anyway
 
Last edited:
Maybe adding Denuvo into well established franchise as CIV is just a social experiment.
Adding few cosmetics already work in favor of preorders.
Amount of people using Steam proves that not owning games that ones payed for is a great business.
Adobe showed that subscription based software is a money maker.
People don't care what software does to their hardware as long as is usable and convenient to use. (allegedly)
 
Maybe adding Denuvo into well established franchise as CIV is just a social experiment.
Adding few cosmetics already work in favor of preorders.
Amount of people using Steam proves that not owning games that ones payed for is a great business.
Adobe showed that subscription based software is a money maker.
People don't care what software does to their hardware as long as is usable and convenient to use. (allegedly)
Exactly. I‘m not going to support all that anymore. Well said man, you have eyes that are able to see.
 
Jesus.

I’m only just reading this thread. I thought from the title ‘Denuvo’ was some city state or something. Now I see what this all about.

Yeah, hard pass for me. I’m not putting stuff like this on my home computer. Absolutely disappointing.

Seriously. Not OK. Not happening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom