Just stopping by to state that I just got aware of the facts that there is no conquest victory and that the domination victory is dependent of capitals. More over, you just can't raze capitals and city states. Even more over, some people are bashing those who would like the option of razing them arguing that it would not make sense...
Carthage anyone?
This game is so not worthy of the sequel title, they should have just changed the name for something like "Battlefield Civilizations".
BTW, I only played the vanilla game for 30 minutes when it came out. Since then, I lurk to see player's reactions and how the game evolve. The more I discover features of the game, the more I find it ******ed.
My humble opinion and another bash on this failure of a sequel.
Yeah, I discussed the razing part when the game first came out and argued that razing a capital was realistic. Carthage was the prime example I gave.
As for being an unworthy sequel, I agree 100%
Perhaps they will get things right in Civ 6.