The purpose of the state is to enable the parasites to legally live off the productive.
Congratulation for completely missing the point of having a state and state regulation of the economy.
The purpose of the state is to enable the parasites to legally live off the productive.
It's honestly getting kind of 50-50 these days. The state is increasingly torn between its role as the guardian of capitalism, and a guardian from capitalism.Congratulation for completely missing the point of having a state and state regulation of the economy.
Obtaining wealth for which one did not labour.
The notion that there can be a widget-baron which controls the world's supply of Widgonium in the absence of state support for widget-barons and state-enacted barriers to competition with said barons is a logical impossibility. It has never existed in the history of the universe and it CANNOT exist because there will always be eager beavers anxious to take the barons down. Unless, of course, there are legal barriers which prevent said beavers from jumping in.Not if the Widget-barons control the world's supply of Widgonium, I can't. I have to go and work in the Widget mills, which is more than can be said for the Widget-barons themselves.
Gifts are not given at such a scale as to be relevant when discussing an entire society.Is getting money via gifts an explotive behavior then?
Productive endeavour.What specifies "labor?"
Good job I never described anything remotely like that, then!The notion that there can be a widget-baron which controls the world's supply of Widgonium in the absence of state support for widget-barons and state-enacted barriers to competition with said barons is a logical impossibility. It has never existed in the history of the universe and it CANNOT exist because there will always be eager beavers anxious to take the barons down. Unless, of course, there are legal barriers which prevent said beavers from jumping in.
Je suis une anarchiste-syndicaliste.Lefties have a bizarre idea that state regulation can somehow rein in powerful corporations and make them work for the common good. This is nonsense. The purpose of the state is to legalize theft by the powerful from the powerless and consequently the bureaucrats and the corporations invariably collude to steal from the rest of us. J.P. Morgan wrote the FED legislation. AT&T came up with the telephone rules. It's still the same today. Do you really think that the Drug companies spent millions of advertising dollars promoting Obamacare because it would rein in their control over us?
The notion that there can be a widget-baron which controls the world's supply of Widgonium in the absence of state support for widget-barons and state-enacted barriers to competition with said barons is a logical impossibility. It has never existed in the history of the universe and it CANNOT exist because there will always be eager beavers anxious to take the barons down. Unless, of course, there are legal barriers which prevent said beavers from jumping in.
Lefties have a bizarre idea that state regulation can somehow rein in powerful corporations and make them work for the common good. This is nonsense. The purpose of the state is to legalize theft by the powerful from the powerless and consequently the bureaucrats and the corporations invariably collude to steal from the rest of us. J.P. Morgan wrote the FED legislation. AT&T came up with the telephone rules. It's still the same today. Do you really think that the Drug companies spent millions of advertising dollars promoting Obamacare because it would rein in their control over us?
Gifts are not exchanged at such a scale as to be relevant when discussing an entire society.
Productive endeavour.
Congratulation for completely missing the point of having a state and state regulation of the economy.
In that he continues to exploit the worker through his retention of unearned wealth? Yes.Then is a rich man leaving several billion dollars worth of money/land/whatever to a close friend or family member an exploitive behavior?
Yes, yes, and yes. A white-collar worker is still a worker.Again, clarify. Is...
Working as a clerk in a bank a productive endeavour?
Is working as stock analyst a productive endeavour?
Is teaching philosophy a productive endeavour?
By definition, no, it is not. That's what marks it as "exploitative", and not "productive". Unless, perhaps, you view the brown rat as amongst our most valued livestock?IMO exploitation is productive; does it not yield good results?
Of course the ethics of it is questionable, but there's no doubt in my mind it's productive.
Hey, prostitution is a hard job, don't knock it.i would rather die standing then live on my knees.
Since I wrote it, let me try to explain.Can somebody simplify the second paragraph for me...
In that he continues to exploit the worker through his retention of unearned wealth? Yes.
The purpose of the state is enable the rich and powerful to exploit the poor and powerless. Therefore the purpose of state regulation is to protect rich from upstart competition by lesser people.
Hey, prostitution is a hard job, don't knock it.![]()
That depends entirely on whether or not he really did "earn" his money, and I, for one, am sceptical as to the possibility of any one human ever producing that much wealth single-handedly. The one grey area is that of intellectual property, which is ever a tricky business for the socialist, although I honestly can't imagine what would allow a man to leap from pauper to billionaire through such means alone.And if this rich man, hypothetically, due to mix of luck and intelligence, earned every single penny of his fortune?
Would not then a man have a right to do anything he wants with his money?
Well, there's plenty of Southerners who's heads are easily turned by a man in a nice plaid skirt.....and you would know?![]()
That depends entirely on whether or not he really did "earn" his money, and I, for one, am sceptical as to the possibility of any one human ever producing that much wealth single-handedly. The one grey area is that of intellectual property, which is ever a tricky business for the socialist, although I honestly can't imagine what would allow a man to leap from pauper to billionaire through such means alone.
Ummm. I just pointed it out. Let me repeat: The purpose of the state is to enable the parasites to legally live off the productive.
Firstly, wealthy is not necessarily material. Secondly, one may be involved in the production process indirectly.So teaching philosophy produces wealth...
That depends on the investor and the investment in question. One cannot generalise....but investing in a textile company does not. Riight.
I'm really not sure how to interpret this response but.. I am going to take it as agreement.